Journal article 109 views
Defining a performance map of porous carbon sorbents for high-pressure carbon dioxide uptake and carbon dioxide–methane selectivity / Saunab Ghosh; Marta Sevilla; Antonio B. Fuertes; Enrico Andreoli; Jason Ho; Andrew R. Barron
J. Mater. Chem. A, Volume: 4, Issue: 38, Pages: 14739 - 14751
Swansea University Author: Barron, Andrew
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1039/C6TA04936B
Document under embargo until: 11th August 2017
The relative influence of heteroatom doping, surface area, and total pore volume of highly microporous carbon materials on CO2 uptake capacity, and the CO2/CH4 selectivity, at high pressure (≤30 bar) is presented. The separation of CO2 from natural gas (natural gas sweetening) is an important applic...
|Published in:||J. Mater. Chem. A|
Check full text
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
The relative influence of heteroatom doping, surface area, and total pore volume of highly microporous carbon materials on CO2 uptake capacity, and the CO2/CH4 selectivity, at high pressure (≤30 bar) is presented. The separation of CO2 from natural gas (natural gas sweetening) is an important application that requires high CO2 uptake in combination with high CO2/CH4 selectivity. Porous carbon (PC), N-doped PC (NPC), and S-doped PC (SPC) materials are prepared using KOH oxidative activation at different temperatures. The surface chemical composition was determined by XPS, while the surface areas, total pore volume, and pore size distributions were obtained by analyzing N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms with support from SEM and TEM. The CO2 and CH4 uptake was determined by volumetric uptake measurements (sorption and desorption). Contrary to previous proposals that N- or S-doping results in high uptake and good selectivity, we show it is the Σ(O,N,S) wt% that is the defining factor for CO2 uptake, of which O appears to be the main factor. Based upon the data analyzed, a performance map has been defined as a guide to designing/choosing materials for both future studies and large scale fluid bed applications using pelletized materials. For CO2 uptake at 30 bar any material with a surface area >2800 m2g-1 and a total pore volume >1.35 cm3g-1 is unlikely to be bettered. Such a material is best prepared by thermal activation between 700-800 °C and will have a carbon content of 80-95 wt% (as determined by XPS). While it has been assumed that the parameters that make a good CO2 adsorbent are the same as those that make a material with high CO2/CH4 selectivity, our results indicate instead that for the best selectivity at 30 bar a surface area >2000 m2g-1 and a total pore volume >1.0 cm3g-1 and a carbon content of <90 wt% are necessary.
This paper debunks the commonly proposed rational for ever higher surface area materails for CO2 adsorption. We show that it is more about the types of pores rather than total pore volume. The paper was covered by 9 news outlets and has been already achieved 1 citation. It has an Altmetric score of 87. As a result of the work Apache Corporation have signed a sponsored research agreement to scale-up the materials as well as create a new IP. They have also signed on as a partner in a WEFO application (RICE).
College of Engineering