E-Thesis 314 views 474 downloads
Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements. / Oskar MacGregor
Swansea University Author: Oskar MacGregor
-
PDF | E-Thesis
Download (7.31MB)
Abstract
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is the primary global organization responsible for implementing rules against doping in sport. A central element of its mission is the requirement that elite athletes submit their whereabouts information for every day of the year to their relevant Anti-Doping Org...
Published: |
2013
|
---|---|
Institution: | Swansea University |
Degree level: | Doctoral |
Degree name: | Ph.D |
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42914 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2018-08-02T18:55:50Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2019-10-21T16:48:41Z |
id |
cronfa42914 |
recordtype |
RisThesis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-08-31T16:12:13.0324964</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>42914</id><entry>2018-08-02</entry><title>Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements.</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>28c1edce81ade986252c6e076097bc69</sid><ORCID>NULL</ORCID><firstname>Oskar</firstname><surname>MacGregor</surname><name>Oskar MacGregor</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>true</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2018-08-02</date><abstract>The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is the primary global organization responsi­ble for implementing rules against doping in sport. A central element of its mission is the requirement that elite athletes submit their whereabouts information for every day of the year to their relevant Anti-Doping Organization (ADO), in order to facilitate no advance notice out-of-competition doping testing. These requirements have attracted considerable criticism, including the claim that they invade elite athlete privacy in a legally or ethically unacceptable manner.The validity of these claims is threatened by the contestedness of the concept of pri­vacy, which arises from the many different uses to which the concept is put, including in legal and philosophical contexts. Resolving this conceptual confusion requires tak­ing an explicit position on various questions of philosophical methodology, themselves subject to contention. As an alternative to such abstraction, and particularly given the need for a philosophically defensible yet pragmatic policy application, I argue that pri­vacy is best conceived of as the absence of certain contextually relevant harms to the person, which arise in relation to such underlying normative values as fairness between competing athletes.In the specific context of elite athlete whereabouts requirements, I maintain that privacy concerns arise principally in relation to surveillance, intrusion, and breaches of confidence. Of these, the first and second face legal difficulties in the UK, on the basis of European legislation concerning human rights and maximum working time. Ethical problems also arise due to WADAs undifferentiated application of the whereabouts requirements, which ignores the heterogeneity of different types of sports and their respective vulnerabilities to doping. I argue that WADAs whereabouts requirements ought therefore to be revised to (a) ensure that they do not conflict with established law, and (b) respect the very different sets of circumstances entailed by the heteroge­neous world of elite sports.</abstract><type>E-Thesis</type><journal/><journalNumber></journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>World Anti-doping Agency</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2013</publishedYear><publishedDate>2013-12-31</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Public Health and Policy Studies</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><degreelevel>Doctoral</degreelevel><degreename>Ph.D</degreename><apcterm/><lastEdited>2018-08-31T16:12:13.0324964</lastEdited><Created>2018-08-02T16:24:30.7730028</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Health and Social Care - Public Health</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Oskar</firstname><surname>MacGregor</surname><orcid>NULL</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0042914-02082018162531.pdf</filename><originalFilename>10821304.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2018-08-02T16:25:31.8000000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>7548989</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>E-Thesis</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2018-08-02T16:25:31.8000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2018-08-31T16:12:13.0324964 v2 42914 2018-08-02 Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements. 28c1edce81ade986252c6e076097bc69 NULL Oskar MacGregor Oskar MacGregor true true 2018-08-02 The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is the primary global organization responsible for implementing rules against doping in sport. A central element of its mission is the requirement that elite athletes submit their whereabouts information for every day of the year to their relevant Anti-Doping Organization (ADO), in order to facilitate no advance notice out-of-competition doping testing. These requirements have attracted considerable criticism, including the claim that they invade elite athlete privacy in a legally or ethically unacceptable manner.The validity of these claims is threatened by the contestedness of the concept of privacy, which arises from the many different uses to which the concept is put, including in legal and philosophical contexts. Resolving this conceptual confusion requires taking an explicit position on various questions of philosophical methodology, themselves subject to contention. As an alternative to such abstraction, and particularly given the need for a philosophically defensible yet pragmatic policy application, I argue that privacy is best conceived of as the absence of certain contextually relevant harms to the person, which arise in relation to such underlying normative values as fairness between competing athletes.In the specific context of elite athlete whereabouts requirements, I maintain that privacy concerns arise principally in relation to surveillance, intrusion, and breaches of confidence. Of these, the first and second face legal difficulties in the UK, on the basis of European legislation concerning human rights and maximum working time. Ethical problems also arise due to WADAs undifferentiated application of the whereabouts requirements, which ignores the heterogeneity of different types of sports and their respective vulnerabilities to doping. I argue that WADAs whereabouts requirements ought therefore to be revised to (a) ensure that they do not conflict with established law, and (b) respect the very different sets of circumstances entailed by the heterogeneous world of elite sports. E-Thesis World Anti-doping Agency 31 12 2013 2013-12-31 COLLEGE NANME Public Health and Policy Studies COLLEGE CODE Swansea University Doctoral Ph.D 2018-08-31T16:12:13.0324964 2018-08-02T16:24:30.7730028 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Health and Social Care - Public Health Oskar MacGregor NULL 1 0042914-02082018162531.pdf 10821304.pdf 2018-08-02T16:25:31.8000000 Output 7548989 application/pdf E-Thesis true 2018-08-02T16:25:31.8000000 false |
title |
Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements. |
spellingShingle |
Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements. Oskar MacGregor |
title_short |
Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements. |
title_full |
Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements. |
title_fullStr |
Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements. |
title_sort |
Anti-doping, whereabouts, and privacy: An ethico-legal analysis of WADA's whereabouts requirements. |
author_id_str_mv |
28c1edce81ade986252c6e076097bc69 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
28c1edce81ade986252c6e076097bc69_***_Oskar MacGregor |
author |
Oskar MacGregor |
author2 |
Oskar MacGregor |
format |
E-Thesis |
publishDate |
2013 |
institution |
Swansea University |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
School of Health and Social Care - Public Health{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Health and Social Care - Public Health |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is the primary global organization responsible for implementing rules against doping in sport. A central element of its mission is the requirement that elite athletes submit their whereabouts information for every day of the year to their relevant Anti-Doping Organization (ADO), in order to facilitate no advance notice out-of-competition doping testing. These requirements have attracted considerable criticism, including the claim that they invade elite athlete privacy in a legally or ethically unacceptable manner.The validity of these claims is threatened by the contestedness of the concept of privacy, which arises from the many different uses to which the concept is put, including in legal and philosophical contexts. Resolving this conceptual confusion requires taking an explicit position on various questions of philosophical methodology, themselves subject to contention. As an alternative to such abstraction, and particularly given the need for a philosophically defensible yet pragmatic policy application, I argue that privacy is best conceived of as the absence of certain contextually relevant harms to the person, which arise in relation to such underlying normative values as fairness between competing athletes.In the specific context of elite athlete whereabouts requirements, I maintain that privacy concerns arise principally in relation to surveillance, intrusion, and breaches of confidence. Of these, the first and second face legal difficulties in the UK, on the basis of European legislation concerning human rights and maximum working time. Ethical problems also arise due to WADAs undifferentiated application of the whereabouts requirements, which ignores the heterogeneity of different types of sports and their respective vulnerabilities to doping. I argue that WADAs whereabouts requirements ought therefore to be revised to (a) ensure that they do not conflict with established law, and (b) respect the very different sets of circumstances entailed by the heterogeneous world of elite sports. |
published_date |
2013-12-31T03:53:54Z |
_version_ |
1763752682780098560 |
score |
10.993443 |