Journal article 1104 views
Lead slingshot (glandes)
Tracey Rihll
Journal of Roman Archaeology, Volume: 22, Pages: 146 - 169
Swansea University Author: Tracey Rihll
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
Abstract
Previous studies of these artefacts have usually passed over in silence many methodological problems and issues that attend them. Typically they have proposed generalizations based on small or very small samples, and these ill-founded generalizations then find their way into the wider literature and...
| Published in: | Journal of Roman Archaeology |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1047-7594 |
| Published: |
Journal of Roman Archaeology
2009
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa11513 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
Previous studies of these artefacts have usually passed over in silence many methodological problems and issues that attend them. Typically they have proposed generalizations based on small or very small samples, and these ill-founded generalizations then find their way into the wider literature and enthusiast websites. This paper explains the problems with such an approach. It is based on study of over 1400 published and unpublished specimens. It then argues that glandes were produced as catapult ammunition. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Glandes, molybdidai, catapult, Roman army, methodology |
| College: |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| Start Page: |
146 |
| End Page: |
169 |