Journal article 1520 views
Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’
Family Law
Swansea University Author: Jane Williams
Abstract
Critique of a decision made at first instance and by majority ruling in the Court of Appeal onthe application of the threshold of 'likely to suffer serious harm' in the Children Act 1989.
Published in: | Family Law |
---|---|
Published: |
2010
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa12905 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2013-07-23T12:09:01Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-02-09T04:43:19Z |
id |
cronfa12905 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>12905</id><entry>2012-09-26</entry><title>Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>d8e8d7e8bfa098e1b9408975f49afbb9</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0467-2317</ORCID><firstname>Jane</firstname><surname>Williams</surname><name>Jane Williams</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-09-26</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>Critique of a decision made at first instance and by majority ruling in the Court of Appeal onthe application of the threshold of 'likely to suffer serious harm' in the Children Act 1989.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Family Law</journal><volume></volume><journalNumber></journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>28</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2010</publishedYear><publishedDate>2010-02-28</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</lastEdited><Created>2012-09-26T17:56:25.4948413</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>John</firstname><surname>Hayes</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Mary</firstname><surname>Hayes</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Jane</firstname><surname>Williams</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0467-2317</orcid><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 v2 12905 2012-09-26 Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’ d8e8d7e8bfa098e1b9408975f49afbb9 0000-0003-0467-2317 Jane Williams Jane Williams true false 2012-09-26 LAWD Critique of a decision made at first instance and by majority ruling in the Court of Appeal onthe application of the threshold of 'likely to suffer serious harm' in the Children Act 1989. Journal Article Family Law 28 2 2010 2010-02-28 COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 2012-09-26T17:56:25.4948413 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law John Hayes 1 Mary Hayes 2 Jane Williams 0000-0003-0467-2317 3 |
title |
Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’ |
spellingShingle |
Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’ Jane Williams |
title_short |
Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’ |
title_full |
Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’ |
title_fullStr |
Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’ |
title_full_unstemmed |
Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’ |
title_sort |
Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’ |
author_id_str_mv |
d8e8d7e8bfa098e1b9408975f49afbb9 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
d8e8d7e8bfa098e1b9408975f49afbb9_***_Jane Williams |
author |
Jane Williams |
author2 |
John Hayes Mary Hayes Jane Williams |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Family Law |
publishDate |
2010 |
institution |
Swansea University |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Critique of a decision made at first instance and by majority ruling in the Court of Appeal onthe application of the threshold of 'likely to suffer serious harm' in the Children Act 1989. |
published_date |
2010-02-28T03:14:48Z |
_version_ |
1763750223785492480 |
score |
11.035634 |