No Cover Image

Journal article 750 views

Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’

John Hayes, Mary Hayes, Jane Williams Orcid Logo

Family Law

Swansea University Author: Jane Williams Orcid Logo

Abstract

Critique of a decision made at first instance and by majority ruling in the Court of Appeal onthe application of the threshold of 'likely to suffer serious harm' in the Children Act 1989.

Published in: Family Law
Published: 2010
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa12905
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T12:09:01Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:43:19Z
id cronfa12905
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>12905</id><entry>2012-09-26</entry><title>Re MA (Care Threshold): &#x201C;Shocking&#x201D; abuse followed by a &#x201C;staggering&#x201D; ruling on likely significant harm&#x2019;</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>d8e8d7e8bfa098e1b9408975f49afbb9</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0467-2317</ORCID><firstname>Jane</firstname><surname>Williams</surname><name>Jane Williams</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-09-26</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>Critique of a decision made at first instance and by majority ruling in the Court of Appeal onthe application of the threshold of 'likely to suffer serious harm' in the Children Act 1989.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Family Law</journal><volume></volume><journalNumber></journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>28</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2010</publishedYear><publishedDate>2010-02-28</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</lastEdited><Created>2012-09-26T17:56:25.4948413</Created><path><level id="1">Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level><level id="2">Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>John</firstname><surname>Hayes</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Mary</firstname><surname>Hayes</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Jane</firstname><surname>Williams</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0467-2317</orcid><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 v2 12905 2012-09-26 Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’ d8e8d7e8bfa098e1b9408975f49afbb9 0000-0003-0467-2317 Jane Williams Jane Williams true false 2012-09-26 LAWD Critique of a decision made at first instance and by majority ruling in the Court of Appeal onthe application of the threshold of 'likely to suffer serious harm' in the Children Act 1989. Journal Article Family Law 28 2 2010 2010-02-28 COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 2012-09-26T17:56:25.4948413 Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law Law John Hayes 1 Mary Hayes 2 Jane Williams 0000-0003-0467-2317 3
title Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’
spellingShingle Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’
Jane Williams
title_short Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’
title_full Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’
title_fullStr Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’
title_full_unstemmed Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’
title_sort Re MA (Care Threshold): “Shocking” abuse followed by a “staggering” ruling on likely significant harm’
author_id_str_mv d8e8d7e8bfa098e1b9408975f49afbb9
author_id_fullname_str_mv d8e8d7e8bfa098e1b9408975f49afbb9_***_Jane Williams
author Jane Williams
author2 John Hayes
Mary Hayes
Jane Williams
format Journal article
container_title Family Law
publishDate 2010
institution Swansea University
college_str Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id hillaryrodhamclintonschooloflaw
hierarchy_top_title Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law
hierarchy_parent_id hillaryrodhamclintonschooloflaw
hierarchy_parent_title Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law
department_str Law{{{_:::_}}}Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Law
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Critique of a decision made at first instance and by majority ruling in the Court of Appeal onthe application of the threshold of 'likely to suffer serious harm' in the Children Act 1989.
published_date 2010-02-28T03:28:45Z
_version_ 1734035296030294016
score 10.87277