No Cover Image

Journal article 1347 views

Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries

Robert Bideleux

Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Volume: 27, Issue: 3-4, Pages: 338 - 363

Swansea University Author: Robert Bideleux

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Abstract

This article developed out of a presentation which I gave to the US Department of State in June 2009, when I was invited to Washington DC to advise the US government on the likely impact of the Western financial crisis of 2008-09 on Europe’s post-Communist states. The articles argues that the nature...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics
ISSN: 1352-3279 1743-9116
Published: 2011
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa13135
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T12:09:31Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:43:41Z
id cronfa13135
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>13135</id><entry>2012-10-29</entry><title>Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008&#x2013;10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>c3b880aac6e4c2a1536185702a45d443</sid><firstname>Robert</firstname><surname>Bideleux</surname><name>Robert Bideleux</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-10-29</date><deptcode>FGHSS</deptcode><abstract>This article developed out of a presentation which I gave to the US Department of State in June 2009, when I was invited to Washington DC to advise the US government on the likely impact of the Western financial crisis of 2008-09 on Europe&#x2019;s post-Communist states. The articles argues that the nature and magnitude of the effects of the international economic crisis on the eleven Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries and on the ten post-communist states admitted into the EU in 2004 or 2007 differed quite widely and are not amenable to broad generalizations. Not surprisingly, therefore, the responses of these states to the crisis have also differed even more widely, as have the longer-term consequences. It is argued that it is not necessary to invoke or fall back on highly questionable allegations of &#x2018;essential&#x2019; cultural differences to explain these widely differing impacts, responses and consequences. They can be satisfactorily explained and conceptualized in terms of relatively concrete and tangible differences in the structures of power, resources, opportunities, incentives and constraints that have emerged in these two broad groupings of countries. Above all, the nature, structure and orientations of the economic systems that have emerged in most of the CIS countries have diverged quite substantially from those of the post-communist states that joined the EU. It is also argued that the profound structural, situational and systemic divergences between the economies of the eleven CIS countries and those of the ten post-communist states admitted into the EU in 2004 or 2007 are very likely to continue to complicate and frustrate attempts to integrate or associate CIS countries more closely with the EU for the foreseeable future.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics</journal><volume>27</volume><journalNumber>3-4</journalNumber><paginationStart>338</paginationStart><paginationEnd>363</paginationEnd><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><issnPrint>1352-3279</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1743-9116</issnElectronic><keywords>Economic crises of 2008-10, European Union, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), East Central Europe</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2011</publishedYear><publishedDate>2011-09-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/13523279.2011.595665</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGHSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</lastEdited><Created>2012-10-29T05:06:14.9209788</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Robert</firstname><surname>Bideleux</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 v2 13135 2012-10-29 Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries c3b880aac6e4c2a1536185702a45d443 Robert Bideleux Robert Bideleux true false 2012-10-29 FGHSS This article developed out of a presentation which I gave to the US Department of State in June 2009, when I was invited to Washington DC to advise the US government on the likely impact of the Western financial crisis of 2008-09 on Europe’s post-Communist states. The articles argues that the nature and magnitude of the effects of the international economic crisis on the eleven Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries and on the ten post-communist states admitted into the EU in 2004 or 2007 differed quite widely and are not amenable to broad generalizations. Not surprisingly, therefore, the responses of these states to the crisis have also differed even more widely, as have the longer-term consequences. It is argued that it is not necessary to invoke or fall back on highly questionable allegations of ‘essential’ cultural differences to explain these widely differing impacts, responses and consequences. They can be satisfactorily explained and conceptualized in terms of relatively concrete and tangible differences in the structures of power, resources, opportunities, incentives and constraints that have emerged in these two broad groupings of countries. Above all, the nature, structure and orientations of the economic systems that have emerged in most of the CIS countries have diverged quite substantially from those of the post-communist states that joined the EU. It is also argued that the profound structural, situational and systemic divergences between the economies of the eleven CIS countries and those of the ten post-communist states admitted into the EU in 2004 or 2007 are very likely to continue to complicate and frustrate attempts to integrate or associate CIS countries more closely with the EU for the foreseeable future. Journal Article Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 3-4 338 363 1352-3279 1743-9116 Economic crises of 2008-10, European Union, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), East Central Europe 30 9 2011 2011-09-30 10.1080/13523279.2011.595665 COLLEGE NANME Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGHSS Swansea University 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 2012-10-29T05:06:14.9209788 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Robert Bideleux 1
title Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries
spellingShingle Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries
Robert Bideleux
title_short Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries
title_full Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries
title_fullStr Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries
title_sort Contrasting Responses to the International Economic Crisis of 2008–10 in the Eleven CIS Countries and in the Ten Post-Communist EU Member Countries
author_id_str_mv c3b880aac6e4c2a1536185702a45d443
author_id_fullname_str_mv c3b880aac6e4c2a1536185702a45d443_***_Robert Bideleux
author Robert Bideleux
author2 Robert Bideleux
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics
container_volume 27
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 338
publishDate 2011
institution Swansea University
issn 1352-3279
1743-9116
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13523279.2011.595665
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description This article developed out of a presentation which I gave to the US Department of State in June 2009, when I was invited to Washington DC to advise the US government on the likely impact of the Western financial crisis of 2008-09 on Europe’s post-Communist states. The articles argues that the nature and magnitude of the effects of the international economic crisis on the eleven Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries and on the ten post-communist states admitted into the EU in 2004 or 2007 differed quite widely and are not amenable to broad generalizations. Not surprisingly, therefore, the responses of these states to the crisis have also differed even more widely, as have the longer-term consequences. It is argued that it is not necessary to invoke or fall back on highly questionable allegations of ‘essential’ cultural differences to explain these widely differing impacts, responses and consequences. They can be satisfactorily explained and conceptualized in terms of relatively concrete and tangible differences in the structures of power, resources, opportunities, incentives and constraints that have emerged in these two broad groupings of countries. Above all, the nature, structure and orientations of the economic systems that have emerged in most of the CIS countries have diverged quite substantially from those of the post-communist states that joined the EU. It is also argued that the profound structural, situational and systemic divergences between the economies of the eleven CIS countries and those of the ten post-communist states admitted into the EU in 2004 or 2007 are very likely to continue to complicate and frustrate attempts to integrate or associate CIS countries more closely with the EU for the foreseeable future.
published_date 2011-09-30T03:15:03Z
_version_ 1763750239228919808
score 11.012678