No Cover Image

Journal article 482 views

The Scientist-Practitioner Model

Rodger Wood

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Pages: 88 - 99

Swansea University Author: Rodger Wood

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b118a

Abstract

One of the core tenets of the scientist-practitioner model, slightly modified to make it applicable to modern neuropsychology,is that assessment procedures should be developed, applied, and interpreted in a relevant scientificframework. However, over the last 30 years, the general structure of a neu...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
ISSN: 0885-9701
Published: 2009
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa13224
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T12:09:45Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:43:50Z
id cronfa13224
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2017-01-27T14:54:48.1803752</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>13224</id><entry>2012-11-05</entry><title>The Scientist-Practitioner Model</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9</sid><firstname>Rodger</firstname><surname>Wood</surname><name>Rodger Wood</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-11-05</date><deptcode>SGMED</deptcode><abstract>One of the core tenets of the scientist-practitioner model, slightly modified to make it applicable to modern neuropsychology,is that assessment procedures should be developed, applied, and interpreted in a relevant scientificframework. However, over the last 30 years, the general structure of a neuropsychological assessment has changedlittle, if at all. It has continued to focus mainly on the assessment of cognitive constructs such as intelligence,memory, attention, and perception. During the same time period, cognitive neuroscience has focused on integrativesystems, largely controlled by frontal mechanisms, that allow individuals to utilize cognitive functions in anadaptive way, especially in the context of novel situations or when social stimuli are ambiguous. Consequently, thegulf between cognitive neuroscience and the practice of clinical neuropsychology has grown uncomfortably large.This article attempts to review some of the developments in cognitive and affective neuroscience that are relevantto an evaluation of neuropsychological abilities, especially in a medicolegal context to determine whether conventionalneuropsychological methods can be considered fit for purpose.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation</journal><volume>24</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>88</paginationStart><paginationEnd>99</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>0885-9701</issnPrint><keywords>executive, forensic, neuropsychology,</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2009</publishedYear><publishedDate>2009-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b118a</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medical School - School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SGMED</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2017-01-27T14:54:48.1803752</lastEdited><Created>2012-11-05T18:36:15.8618596</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Rodger</firstname><surname>Wood</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2017-01-27T14:54:48.1803752 v2 13224 2012-11-05 The Scientist-Practitioner Model 7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9 Rodger Wood Rodger Wood true false 2012-11-05 SGMED One of the core tenets of the scientist-practitioner model, slightly modified to make it applicable to modern neuropsychology,is that assessment procedures should be developed, applied, and interpreted in a relevant scientificframework. However, over the last 30 years, the general structure of a neuropsychological assessment has changedlittle, if at all. It has continued to focus mainly on the assessment of cognitive constructs such as intelligence,memory, attention, and perception. During the same time period, cognitive neuroscience has focused on integrativesystems, largely controlled by frontal mechanisms, that allow individuals to utilize cognitive functions in anadaptive way, especially in the context of novel situations or when social stimuli are ambiguous. Consequently, thegulf between cognitive neuroscience and the practice of clinical neuropsychology has grown uncomfortably large.This article attempts to review some of the developments in cognitive and affective neuroscience that are relevantto an evaluation of neuropsychological abilities, especially in a medicolegal context to determine whether conventionalneuropsychological methods can be considered fit for purpose. Journal Article Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 24 2 88 99 0885-9701 executive, forensic, neuropsychology, 31 12 2009 2009-12-31 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b118a COLLEGE NANME Medical School - School COLLEGE CODE SGMED Swansea University 2017-01-27T14:54:48.1803752 2012-11-05T18:36:15.8618596 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Rodger Wood 1
title The Scientist-Practitioner Model
spellingShingle The Scientist-Practitioner Model
Rodger Wood
title_short The Scientist-Practitioner Model
title_full The Scientist-Practitioner Model
title_fullStr The Scientist-Practitioner Model
title_full_unstemmed The Scientist-Practitioner Model
title_sort The Scientist-Practitioner Model
author_id_str_mv 7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9
author_id_fullname_str_mv 7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9_***_Rodger Wood
author Rodger Wood
author2 Rodger Wood
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
container_volume 24
container_issue 2
container_start_page 88
publishDate 2009
institution Swansea University
issn 0885-9701
doi_str_mv 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b118a
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description One of the core tenets of the scientist-practitioner model, slightly modified to make it applicable to modern neuropsychology,is that assessment procedures should be developed, applied, and interpreted in a relevant scientificframework. However, over the last 30 years, the general structure of a neuropsychological assessment has changedlittle, if at all. It has continued to focus mainly on the assessment of cognitive constructs such as intelligence,memory, attention, and perception. During the same time period, cognitive neuroscience has focused on integrativesystems, largely controlled by frontal mechanisms, that allow individuals to utilize cognitive functions in anadaptive way, especially in the context of novel situations or when social stimuli are ambiguous. Consequently, thegulf between cognitive neuroscience and the practice of clinical neuropsychology has grown uncomfortably large.This article attempts to review some of the developments in cognitive and affective neuroscience that are relevantto an evaluation of neuropsychological abilities, especially in a medicolegal context to determine whether conventionalneuropsychological methods can be considered fit for purpose.
published_date 2009-12-31T03:15:10Z
_version_ 1763750245911494656
score 11.021648

Similar Items