Journal article 482 views
The Scientist-Practitioner Model
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Pages: 88 - 99
Swansea University Author: Rodger Wood
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b118a
Abstract
One of the core tenets of the scientist-practitioner model, slightly modified to make it applicable to modern neuropsychology,is that assessment procedures should be developed, applied, and interpreted in a relevant scientificframework. However, over the last 30 years, the general structure of a neu...
Published in: | Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0885-9701 |
Published: |
2009
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa13224 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2013-07-23T12:09:45Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-02-09T04:43:50Z |
id |
cronfa13224 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2017-01-27T14:54:48.1803752</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>13224</id><entry>2012-11-05</entry><title>The Scientist-Practitioner Model</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9</sid><firstname>Rodger</firstname><surname>Wood</surname><name>Rodger Wood</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-11-05</date><deptcode>SGMED</deptcode><abstract>One of the core tenets of the scientist-practitioner model, slightly modified to make it applicable to modern neuropsychology,is that assessment procedures should be developed, applied, and interpreted in a relevant scientificframework. However, over the last 30 years, the general structure of a neuropsychological assessment has changedlittle, if at all. It has continued to focus mainly on the assessment of cognitive constructs such as intelligence,memory, attention, and perception. During the same time period, cognitive neuroscience has focused on integrativesystems, largely controlled by frontal mechanisms, that allow individuals to utilize cognitive functions in anadaptive way, especially in the context of novel situations or when social stimuli are ambiguous. Consequently, thegulf between cognitive neuroscience and the practice of clinical neuropsychology has grown uncomfortably large.This article attempts to review some of the developments in cognitive and affective neuroscience that are relevantto an evaluation of neuropsychological abilities, especially in a medicolegal context to determine whether conventionalneuropsychological methods can be considered fit for purpose.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation</journal><volume>24</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>88</paginationStart><paginationEnd>99</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>0885-9701</issnPrint><keywords>executive, forensic, neuropsychology,</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2009</publishedYear><publishedDate>2009-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b118a</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medical School - School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SGMED</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2017-01-27T14:54:48.1803752</lastEdited><Created>2012-11-05T18:36:15.8618596</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Rodger</firstname><surname>Wood</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2017-01-27T14:54:48.1803752 v2 13224 2012-11-05 The Scientist-Practitioner Model 7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9 Rodger Wood Rodger Wood true false 2012-11-05 SGMED One of the core tenets of the scientist-practitioner model, slightly modified to make it applicable to modern neuropsychology,is that assessment procedures should be developed, applied, and interpreted in a relevant scientificframework. However, over the last 30 years, the general structure of a neuropsychological assessment has changedlittle, if at all. It has continued to focus mainly on the assessment of cognitive constructs such as intelligence,memory, attention, and perception. During the same time period, cognitive neuroscience has focused on integrativesystems, largely controlled by frontal mechanisms, that allow individuals to utilize cognitive functions in anadaptive way, especially in the context of novel situations or when social stimuli are ambiguous. Consequently, thegulf between cognitive neuroscience and the practice of clinical neuropsychology has grown uncomfortably large.This article attempts to review some of the developments in cognitive and affective neuroscience that are relevantto an evaluation of neuropsychological abilities, especially in a medicolegal context to determine whether conventionalneuropsychological methods can be considered fit for purpose. Journal Article Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 24 2 88 99 0885-9701 executive, forensic, neuropsychology, 31 12 2009 2009-12-31 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b118a COLLEGE NANME Medical School - School COLLEGE CODE SGMED Swansea University 2017-01-27T14:54:48.1803752 2012-11-05T18:36:15.8618596 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Rodger Wood 1 |
title |
The Scientist-Practitioner Model |
spellingShingle |
The Scientist-Practitioner Model Rodger Wood |
title_short |
The Scientist-Practitioner Model |
title_full |
The Scientist-Practitioner Model |
title_fullStr |
The Scientist-Practitioner Model |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Scientist-Practitioner Model |
title_sort |
The Scientist-Practitioner Model |
author_id_str_mv |
7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9_***_Rodger Wood |
author |
Rodger Wood |
author2 |
Rodger Wood |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation |
container_volume |
24 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
88 |
publishDate |
2009 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0885-9701 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b118a |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
One of the core tenets of the scientist-practitioner model, slightly modified to make it applicable to modern neuropsychology,is that assessment procedures should be developed, applied, and interpreted in a relevant scientificframework. However, over the last 30 years, the general structure of a neuropsychological assessment has changedlittle, if at all. It has continued to focus mainly on the assessment of cognitive constructs such as intelligence,memory, attention, and perception. During the same time period, cognitive neuroscience has focused on integrativesystems, largely controlled by frontal mechanisms, that allow individuals to utilize cognitive functions in anadaptive way, especially in the context of novel situations or when social stimuli are ambiguous. Consequently, thegulf between cognitive neuroscience and the practice of clinical neuropsychology has grown uncomfortably large.This article attempts to review some of the developments in cognitive and affective neuroscience that are relevantto an evaluation of neuropsychological abilities, especially in a medicolegal context to determine whether conventionalneuropsychological methods can be considered fit for purpose. |
published_date |
2009-12-31T03:15:10Z |
_version_ |
1763750245911494656 |
score |
11.021648 |