No Cover Image

Journal article 1049 views

The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury

Charlotte Cattran, Michael Oddy, Rodger Wood

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Volume: 33, Issue: 6, Pages: 672 - 679

Swansea University Author: Rodger Wood

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Abstract

Disturbances in emotional regulation following acquired brain injury have been found to be both prevalent and particularly disabling. Despite this, relatively little attention has been given to identifying characteristics of such deficits in a systematic way. We therefore describe the development of...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
ISSN: 1380-3395 1744-411X
Published: 2011
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa13238
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T12:09:47Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:43:51Z
id cronfa13238
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2014-03-06T15:31:50.8390853</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>13238</id><entry>2012-11-12</entry><title>The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9</sid><firstname>Rodger</firstname><surname>Wood</surname><name>Rodger Wood</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-11-12</date><deptcode>SGMED</deptcode><abstract>Disturbances in emotional regulation following acquired brain injury have been found to be both prevalent and particularly disabling. Despite this, relatively little attention has been given to identifying characteristics of such deficits in a systematic way. We therefore describe the development of a new questionnaire measure of disturbances in emotional regulation that may occur following acquired brain injury. The measure demonstrates excellent psychometric properties, including high test&#x2013;retest (.95) and split half (.96) reliability, high internal consistency (.96), and good concurrent validity (r&#x2009;=&#x2009;.64&#x2013;.82). The questionnaire measures characteristics that are distinguishable from measures of cognitive ability and from other tests of affect. There was moderate overlap between self-report and relative versions of the questionnaire. Results suggest that the relative version has the stronger predictive value. The potential uses of the measure in relation to theory and practice are discussed.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology</journal><volume>33</volume><journalNumber>6</journalNumber><paginationStart>672</paginationStart><paginationEnd>679</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>1380-3395</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1744-411X</issnElectronic><keywords>Brain injury, Emotional regulation, Measurement, Questionnaire, Outcome prediction</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2011</publishedYear><publishedDate>2011-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/13803395.2010.550603</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medical School - School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SGMED</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2014-03-06T15:31:50.8390853</lastEdited><Created>2012-11-12T13:24:18.3437147</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Charlotte</firstname><surname>Cattran</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>Oddy</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Rodger</firstname><surname>Wood</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2014-03-06T15:31:50.8390853 v2 13238 2012-11-12 The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury 7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9 Rodger Wood Rodger Wood true false 2012-11-12 SGMED Disturbances in emotional regulation following acquired brain injury have been found to be both prevalent and particularly disabling. Despite this, relatively little attention has been given to identifying characteristics of such deficits in a systematic way. We therefore describe the development of a new questionnaire measure of disturbances in emotional regulation that may occur following acquired brain injury. The measure demonstrates excellent psychometric properties, including high test–retest (.95) and split half (.96) reliability, high internal consistency (.96), and good concurrent validity (r = .64–.82). The questionnaire measures characteristics that are distinguishable from measures of cognitive ability and from other tests of affect. There was moderate overlap between self-report and relative versions of the questionnaire. Results suggest that the relative version has the stronger predictive value. The potential uses of the measure in relation to theory and practice are discussed. Journal Article Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 33 6 672 679 1380-3395 1744-411X Brain injury, Emotional regulation, Measurement, Questionnaire, Outcome prediction 31 12 2011 2011-12-31 10.1080/13803395.2010.550603 COLLEGE NANME Medical School - School COLLEGE CODE SGMED Swansea University 2014-03-06T15:31:50.8390853 2012-11-12T13:24:18.3437147 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Charlotte Cattran 1 Michael Oddy 2 Rodger Wood 3
title The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury
spellingShingle The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury
Rodger Wood
title_short The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury
title_full The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury
title_fullStr The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury
title_full_unstemmed The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury
title_sort The development of a measure of emotional regulation following acquired brain injury
author_id_str_mv 7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9
author_id_fullname_str_mv 7d67e475699a3b3ab820b4a5d2602dc9_***_Rodger Wood
author Rodger Wood
author2 Charlotte Cattran
Michael Oddy
Rodger Wood
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
container_volume 33
container_issue 6
container_start_page 672
publishDate 2011
institution Swansea University
issn 1380-3395
1744-411X
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13803395.2010.550603
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Disturbances in emotional regulation following acquired brain injury have been found to be both prevalent and particularly disabling. Despite this, relatively little attention has been given to identifying characteristics of such deficits in a systematic way. We therefore describe the development of a new questionnaire measure of disturbances in emotional regulation that may occur following acquired brain injury. The measure demonstrates excellent psychometric properties, including high test–retest (.95) and split half (.96) reliability, high internal consistency (.96), and good concurrent validity (r = .64–.82). The questionnaire measures characteristics that are distinguishable from measures of cognitive ability and from other tests of affect. There was moderate overlap between self-report and relative versions of the questionnaire. Results suggest that the relative version has the stronger predictive value. The potential uses of the measure in relation to theory and practice are discussed.
published_date 2011-12-31T03:15:10Z
_version_ 1763750246883524608
score 11.012678