No Cover Image

Journal article 1404 views

Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk

Charles Musselwhite Orcid Logo

Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume: 38, Issue: 2

Swansea University Author: Charles Musselwhite Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.003

Abstract

In driving motorised vehicles, the amount of risk accepted varies between individuals. Traditional theories of risk have tended to focus on a lack of skill as a function of risk taking and have ignored social motivations and attitudes for engaging in risk. This study aims to categorise and contextua...

Full description

Published in: Accident Analysis & Prevention
ISSN: 0001-4575
Published: 2006
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa14674
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T12:12:40Z
last_indexed 2019-06-14T19:17:53Z
id cronfa14674
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-06-14T11:46:22.5782521</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>14674</id><entry>2013-04-23</entry><title>Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-4831-2092</ORCID><firstname>Charles</firstname><surname>Musselwhite</surname><name>Charles Musselwhite</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2013-04-23</date><deptcode>PHAC</deptcode><abstract>In driving motorised vehicles, the amount of risk accepted varies between individuals. Traditional theories of risk have tended to focus on a lack of skill as a function of risk taking and have ignored social motivations and attitudes for engaging in risk. This study aims to categorise and contextualise risk taking behaviour in relation to car driving through studying the motivations and attitudes towards risk. The results were tested on a representative sample (n = 1655) of the UK driving population and four groups were identified based on motivations; those that took risk unintentionally formed the largest group. Three smaller groups who took deliberate risks were also found, a reactive risk taking group who took risks when reacting to stress or being in a hurry, a calculated risk taking group who took risks when they felt it was safe to do so, such as late at night or on well-known roads, and a continuous risk taking group who frequently took risks for their own sake</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Accident Analysis &amp; Prevention</journal><volume>38</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationEnd>334</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>0001-4575</issnPrint><keywords>Risk; Driving; Attitudes; Motivation</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2006</publishedYear><publishedDate>2006-03-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.003</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Public Health</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>PHAC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-06-14T11:46:22.5782521</lastEdited><Created>2013-04-23T15:43:23.7572495</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">The Centre for Innovative Ageing</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Charles</firstname><surname>Musselwhite</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4831-2092</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-06-14T11:46:22.5782521 v2 14674 2013-04-23 Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c 0000-0002-4831-2092 Charles Musselwhite Charles Musselwhite true false 2013-04-23 PHAC In driving motorised vehicles, the amount of risk accepted varies between individuals. Traditional theories of risk have tended to focus on a lack of skill as a function of risk taking and have ignored social motivations and attitudes for engaging in risk. This study aims to categorise and contextualise risk taking behaviour in relation to car driving through studying the motivations and attitudes towards risk. The results were tested on a representative sample (n = 1655) of the UK driving population and four groups were identified based on motivations; those that took risk unintentionally formed the largest group. Three smaller groups who took deliberate risks were also found, a reactive risk taking group who took risks when reacting to stress or being in a hurry, a calculated risk taking group who took risks when they felt it was safe to do so, such as late at night or on well-known roads, and a continuous risk taking group who frequently took risks for their own sake Journal Article Accident Analysis & Prevention 38 2 334 0001-4575 Risk; Driving; Attitudes; Motivation 31 3 2006 2006-03-31 10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.003 COLLEGE NANME Public Health COLLEGE CODE PHAC Swansea University 2019-06-14T11:46:22.5782521 2013-04-23T15:43:23.7572495 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences The Centre for Innovative Ageing Charles Musselwhite 0000-0002-4831-2092 1
title Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk
spellingShingle Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk
Charles Musselwhite
title_short Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk
title_full Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk
title_fullStr Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk
title_sort Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk
author_id_str_mv c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c
author_id_fullname_str_mv c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c_***_Charles Musselwhite
author Charles Musselwhite
author2 Charles Musselwhite
format Journal article
container_title Accident Analysis & Prevention
container_volume 38
container_issue 2
publishDate 2006
institution Swansea University
issn 0001-4575
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.003
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str The Centre for Innovative Ageing{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}The Centre for Innovative Ageing
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description In driving motorised vehicles, the amount of risk accepted varies between individuals. Traditional theories of risk have tended to focus on a lack of skill as a function of risk taking and have ignored social motivations and attitudes for engaging in risk. This study aims to categorise and contextualise risk taking behaviour in relation to car driving through studying the motivations and attitudes towards risk. The results were tested on a representative sample (n = 1655) of the UK driving population and four groups were identified based on motivations; those that took risk unintentionally formed the largest group. Three smaller groups who took deliberate risks were also found, a reactive risk taking group who took risks when reacting to stress or being in a hurry, a calculated risk taking group who took risks when they felt it was safe to do so, such as late at night or on well-known roads, and a continuous risk taking group who frequently took risks for their own sake
published_date 2006-03-31T03:16:47Z
_version_ 1763750348249366528
score 11.016235

Similar Items