No Cover Image

Journal article 656 views

Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis / Simon, Dymond; Alice, Hoon

The Behavior Analyst, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 97 - 117

Swansesa University Authors: Simon, Dymond, Alice, Hoon

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1007/BF03392206

Abstract

Relational frame theory (RFT) is a contemporary behavior-analytic account of language and cognition. Since it was first outlined in 1985, RFT has generated considerable controversy and debate, and several claims have been made concerning its evidence base. The present study sought to evaluate the ev...

Full description

Published in: The Behavior Analyst
ISSN: 0738-6729 2196-8918
Published: 2010
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa16690
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-12-18T03:03:09Z
last_indexed 2019-07-11T20:04:44Z
id cronfa16690
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-07-11T16:02:50.8630026</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>16690</id><entry>2013-12-17</entry><title>Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8ed0024546f2588fdb0073a7d6fbc075</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-1319-4492</ORCID><firstname>Simon</firstname><surname>Dymond</surname><name>Simon Dymond</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>6ee42ad57b74f8941f4de3f02eed163f</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-9921-6156</ORCID><firstname>Alice</firstname><surname>Hoon</surname><name>Alice Hoon</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2013-12-17</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>Relational frame theory (RFT) is a contemporary behavior-analytic account of language and cognition. Since it was first outlined in 1985, RFT has generated considerable controversy and debate, and several claims have been made concerning its evidence base. The present study sought to evaluate the evidence base for RFT by undertaking a citation analysis and by categorizing all articles that cited RFT-related search terms. A total of 174 articles were identified between 1991 and 2008, 62 (36%) of which were empirical and 112 (64%) were nonempirical articles. Further analyses revealed that 42 (68%) of the empirical articles were classified as empirical RFT and 20 (32%) as empirical other, whereas 27 (24%) of the nonempirical articles were assigned to the nonempirical reviews category and 85 (76%) to the nonempirical conceptual category. In addition, the present findings show that the majority of empirical research on RFT has been conducted with typically developing adult populations, on the relational frame of sameness, and has tended to be published in either The Psychological Record or the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Overall, RFT has made a substantial contribution to the literature in a relatively short period of time.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>The Behavior Analyst</journal><volume>33</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>97</paginationStart><paginationEnd>117</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>0738-6729</issnPrint><issnElectronic>2196-8918</issnElectronic><keywords>relational frame theory, verbal behavior, citation analysis</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>4</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2010</publishedYear><publishedDate>2010-04-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1007/BF03392206</doi><url/><notes></notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><lastEdited>2019-07-11T16:02:50.8630026</lastEdited><Created>2013-12-17T13:42:29.6114867</Created><path><level id="1">Swansea University Medical School</level><level id="2">Medicine</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Simon</firstname><surname>Dymond</surname><orcid>0000-0003-1319-4492</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Richard J.</firstname><surname>May</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Anita</firstname><surname>Munnelly</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Alice</firstname><surname>Hoon</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9921-6156</orcid><order>4</order></author></authors><documents/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-07-11T16:02:50.8630026 v2 16690 2013-12-17 Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis 8ed0024546f2588fdb0073a7d6fbc075 0000-0003-1319-4492 Simon Dymond Simon Dymond true false 6ee42ad57b74f8941f4de3f02eed163f 0000-0002-9921-6156 Alice Hoon Alice Hoon true false 2013-12-17 HPS Relational frame theory (RFT) is a contemporary behavior-analytic account of language and cognition. Since it was first outlined in 1985, RFT has generated considerable controversy and debate, and several claims have been made concerning its evidence base. The present study sought to evaluate the evidence base for RFT by undertaking a citation analysis and by categorizing all articles that cited RFT-related search terms. A total of 174 articles were identified between 1991 and 2008, 62 (36%) of which were empirical and 112 (64%) were nonempirical articles. Further analyses revealed that 42 (68%) of the empirical articles were classified as empirical RFT and 20 (32%) as empirical other, whereas 27 (24%) of the nonempirical articles were assigned to the nonempirical reviews category and 85 (76%) to the nonempirical conceptual category. In addition, the present findings show that the majority of empirical research on RFT has been conducted with typically developing adult populations, on the relational frame of sameness, and has tended to be published in either The Psychological Record or the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Overall, RFT has made a substantial contribution to the literature in a relatively short period of time. Journal Article The Behavior Analyst 33 1 97 117 0738-6729 2196-8918 relational frame theory, verbal behavior, citation analysis 30 4 2010 2010-04-30 10.1007/BF03392206 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University 2019-07-11T16:02:50.8630026 2013-12-17T13:42:29.6114867 Swansea University Medical School Medicine Simon Dymond 0000-0003-1319-4492 1 Richard J. May 2 Anita Munnelly 3 Alice Hoon 0000-0002-9921-6156 4
title Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis
spellingShingle Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis
Simon, Dymond
Alice, Hoon
title_short Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis
title_full Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis
title_sort Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis
author_id_str_mv 8ed0024546f2588fdb0073a7d6fbc075
6ee42ad57b74f8941f4de3f02eed163f
author_id_fullname_str_mv 8ed0024546f2588fdb0073a7d6fbc075_***_Simon, Dymond
6ee42ad57b74f8941f4de3f02eed163f_***_Alice, Hoon
author Simon, Dymond
Alice, Hoon
format Journal article
container_title The Behavior Analyst
container_volume 33
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
publishDate 2010
institution Swansea University
issn 0738-6729
2196-8918
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03392206
college_str Swansea University Medical School
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id swanseauniversitymedicalschool
hierarchy_top_title Swansea University Medical School
hierarchy_parent_id swanseauniversitymedicalschool
hierarchy_parent_title Swansea University Medical School
department_str Medicine{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School{{{_:::_}}}Medicine
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Relational frame theory (RFT) is a contemporary behavior-analytic account of language and cognition. Since it was first outlined in 1985, RFT has generated considerable controversy and debate, and several claims have been made concerning its evidence base. The present study sought to evaluate the evidence base for RFT by undertaking a citation analysis and by categorizing all articles that cited RFT-related search terms. A total of 174 articles were identified between 1991 and 2008, 62 (36%) of which were empirical and 112 (64%) were nonempirical articles. Further analyses revealed that 42 (68%) of the empirical articles were classified as empirical RFT and 20 (32%) as empirical other, whereas 27 (24%) of the nonempirical articles were assigned to the nonempirical reviews category and 85 (76%) to the nonempirical conceptual category. In addition, the present findings show that the majority of empirical research on RFT has been conducted with typically developing adult populations, on the relational frame of sameness, and has tended to be published in either The Psychological Record or the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Overall, RFT has made a substantial contribution to the literature in a relatively short period of time.
published_date 2010-04-30T19:34:44Z
_version_ 1662524466867994624
score 10.891415