No Cover Image

Book chapter 673 views

The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance

Jukka Snell

Judging Europe's Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice, Pages: 109 - 126

Swansea University Author: Jukka Snell

Abstract

The chapter investigates how the European Court of Justice has coped with the free movement provisions of the Treaties; has its case law been legitimate? The fundamental starting point of the analysis is simple. The European Court of Justice is both a court and a European institution. As a result, i...

Full description

Published in: Judging Europe's Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice
Published: Oxford Hart Publishing 2013
Online Access: http://www.hartpub.co.uk/BookDetails.aspx?ISBN=9781849463355
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa16787
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2014-01-09T03:03:47Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:49:45Z
id cronfa16787
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2014-03-25T14:10:38.8479025</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>16787</id><entry>2014-01-08</entry><title>The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1</sid><firstname>Jukka</firstname><surname>Snell</surname><name>Jukka Snell</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2014-01-08</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>The chapter investigates how the European Court of Justice has coped with the free movement provisions of the Treaties; has its case law been legitimate? The fundamental starting point of the analysis is simple. The European Court of Justice is both a court and a European institution. As a result, it needs to comply with two sets of standards: those required of judicial institutions and those required of EU institutions. In other words, two questions need to be answered: has the Court behaved like a court should, and has the Court observed the limits that EU institutions should observe? It will be argued that while many aspects of the Court&#x2019;s work in the field of free movement can be criticised, the final verdict should not be overly harsh, given the context.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>Judging Europe's Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice</journal><paginationStart>109</paginationStart><paginationEnd>126</paginationEnd><publisher>Hart Publishing</publisher><placeOfPublication>Oxford</placeOfPublication><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2013</publishedYear><publishedDate>2013-12-01</publishedDate><doi/><url>http://www.hartpub.co.uk/BookDetails.aspx?ISBN=9781849463355</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2014-03-25T14:10:38.8479025</lastEdited><Created>2014-01-08T07:54:18.2669504</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Jukka</firstname><surname>Snell</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2014-03-25T14:10:38.8479025 v2 16787 2014-01-08 The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance 888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1 Jukka Snell Jukka Snell true false 2014-01-08 LAWD The chapter investigates how the European Court of Justice has coped with the free movement provisions of the Treaties; has its case law been legitimate? The fundamental starting point of the analysis is simple. The European Court of Justice is both a court and a European institution. As a result, it needs to comply with two sets of standards: those required of judicial institutions and those required of EU institutions. In other words, two questions need to be answered: has the Court behaved like a court should, and has the Court observed the limits that EU institutions should observe? It will be argued that while many aspects of the Court’s work in the field of free movement can be criticised, the final verdict should not be overly harsh, given the context. Book chapter Judging Europe's Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice 109 126 Hart Publishing Oxford 1 12 2013 2013-12-01 http://www.hartpub.co.uk/BookDetails.aspx?ISBN=9781849463355 COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2014-03-25T14:10:38.8479025 2014-01-08T07:54:18.2669504 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Jukka Snell 1
title The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance
spellingShingle The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance
Jukka Snell
title_short The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance
title_full The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance
title_fullStr The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance
title_full_unstemmed The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance
title_sort The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance
author_id_str_mv 888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1
author_id_fullname_str_mv 888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1_***_Jukka Snell
author Jukka Snell
author2 Jukka Snell
format Book chapter
container_title Judging Europe's Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice
container_start_page 109
publishDate 2013
institution Swansea University
publisher Hart Publishing
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url http://www.hartpub.co.uk/BookDetails.aspx?ISBN=9781849463355
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description The chapter investigates how the European Court of Justice has coped with the free movement provisions of the Treaties; has its case law been legitimate? The fundamental starting point of the analysis is simple. The European Court of Justice is both a court and a European institution. As a result, it needs to comply with two sets of standards: those required of judicial institutions and those required of EU institutions. In other words, two questions need to be answered: has the Court behaved like a court should, and has the Court observed the limits that EU institutions should observe? It will be argued that while many aspects of the Court’s work in the field of free movement can be criticised, the final verdict should not be overly harsh, given the context.
published_date 2013-12-01T03:19:16Z
_version_ 1763750504090828800
score 11.016235

Similar Items