No Cover Image

Journal article 1122 views

The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock"

Steve Stewart-Williams, Andrew Thomas Orcid Logo

Psychological Inquiry, Volume: 24, Pages: 248 - 271

Swansea University Authors: Steve Stewart-Williams, Andrew Thomas Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/1047840X.2013.823831

Abstract

We respond to the commentaries on our target article, The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock. We start with specific issues raised by the article. These relate to the magnitude of human sex differences; the evolution and relative importance of pair bonding, paternal care, and polygyny in our species;...

Full description

Published in: Psychological Inquiry
Published: 2013
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa16880
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2014-01-24T02:30:02Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:49:58Z
id cronfa16880
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2014-03-04T10:19:00.1876630</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>16880</id><entry>2014-01-11</entry><title>The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock"</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>1296cac0a5504263ae725614f97dc0f8</sid><firstname>Steve</firstname><surname>Stewart-Williams</surname><name>Steve Stewart-Williams</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>a43308ae6d7f5b8d5ab0daff5b832a96</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-5251-7923</ORCID><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Thomas</surname><name>Andrew Thomas</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2014-01-11</date><abstract>We respond to the commentaries on our target article, The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock. We start with specific issues raised by the article. These relate to the magnitude of human sex differences; the evolution and relative importance of pair bonding, paternal care, and polygyny in our species; and the distinction between the males-compete/females-choose (MCFC) model of human sexual psychology and the mutual mate choice (MMC) model. We then evaluate two competing theories of human sex differences and similarities: Social Role Theory and Attachment Fertility Theory. We conclude with some thoughts about how to present and teach evolutionary psychological research and theories without conveying an exaggerated impression of the scale of human sex differences.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Psychological Inquiry</journal><volume>24</volume><paginationStart>248</paginationStart><paginationEnd>271</paginationEnd><publisher/><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2013</publishedYear><publishedDate>2013-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/1047840X.2013.823831</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2014-03-04T10:19:00.1876630</lastEdited><Created>2014-01-11T09:24:29.4229768</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Steve</firstname><surname>Stewart-Williams</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Thomas</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5251-7923</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2014-03-04T10:19:00.1876630 v2 16880 2014-01-11 The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock" 1296cac0a5504263ae725614f97dc0f8 Steve Stewart-Williams Steve Stewart-Williams true false a43308ae6d7f5b8d5ab0daff5b832a96 0000-0001-5251-7923 Andrew Thomas Andrew Thomas true false 2014-01-11 We respond to the commentaries on our target article, The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock. We start with specific issues raised by the article. These relate to the magnitude of human sex differences; the evolution and relative importance of pair bonding, paternal care, and polygyny in our species; and the distinction between the males-compete/females-choose (MCFC) model of human sexual psychology and the mutual mate choice (MMC) model. We then evaluate two competing theories of human sex differences and similarities: Social Role Theory and Attachment Fertility Theory. We conclude with some thoughts about how to present and teach evolutionary psychological research and theories without conveying an exaggerated impression of the scale of human sex differences. Journal Article Psychological Inquiry 24 248 271 31 12 2013 2013-12-31 10.1080/1047840X.2013.823831 COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University 2014-03-04T10:19:00.1876630 2014-01-11T09:24:29.4229768 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Steve Stewart-Williams 1 Andrew Thomas 0000-0001-5251-7923 2
title The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock"
spellingShingle The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock"
Steve Stewart-Williams
Andrew Thomas
title_short The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock"
title_full The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock"
title_fullStr The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock"
title_full_unstemmed The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock"
title_sort The ape that kicked the hornet's nest: Response to commentaries on "The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock"
author_id_str_mv 1296cac0a5504263ae725614f97dc0f8
a43308ae6d7f5b8d5ab0daff5b832a96
author_id_fullname_str_mv 1296cac0a5504263ae725614f97dc0f8_***_Steve Stewart-Williams
a43308ae6d7f5b8d5ab0daff5b832a96_***_Andrew Thomas
author Steve Stewart-Williams
Andrew Thomas
author2 Steve Stewart-Williams
Andrew Thomas
format Journal article
container_title Psychological Inquiry
container_volume 24
container_start_page 248
publishDate 2013
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.1080/1047840X.2013.823831
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description We respond to the commentaries on our target article, The Ape that Thought It Was a Peacock. We start with specific issues raised by the article. These relate to the magnitude of human sex differences; the evolution and relative importance of pair bonding, paternal care, and polygyny in our species; and the distinction between the males-compete/females-choose (MCFC) model of human sexual psychology and the mutual mate choice (MMC) model. We then evaluate two competing theories of human sex differences and similarities: Social Role Theory and Attachment Fertility Theory. We conclude with some thoughts about how to present and teach evolutionary psychological research and theories without conveying an exaggerated impression of the scale of human sex differences.
published_date 2013-12-31T03:19:23Z
_version_ 1763750511617507328
score 11.012678

Similar Items