No Cover Image

Book chapter 1559 views

‘Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations’

Karen Morrow Orcid Logo

Gender and the Environment

Swansea University Author: Karen Morrow Orcid Logo

Abstract

This publication reprints an electronic publication from Jereja Penca and Correa de Andrade (eds.), The Dominance of Climate Change in Environmental Law: Taking Stock for Rio +20 (European University Institute, 2012) which considers the approaches adopted to developing international environmental la...

Full description

Published in: Gender and the Environment
Published: London Routledge 2015
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa21999
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2015-06-09T16:07:36Z
last_indexed 2021-06-24T02:36:41Z
id cronfa21999
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-06-23T09:10:44.4050870</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>21999</id><entry>2015-06-09</entry><title>&#x2018;Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations&#x2019;</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>bd81527adf441ea93955f1ccec802a0e</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-0139-5804</ORCID><firstname>Karen</firstname><surname>Morrow</surname><name>Karen Morrow</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2015-06-09</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>This publication reprints an electronic publication from Jereja Penca and Correa de Andrade (eds.), The Dominance of Climate Change in Environmental Law: Taking Stock for Rio +20 (European University Institute, 2012) which considers the approaches adopted to developing international environmental law rooted in the 1992 UNCED 1992, comparing the typical &#x2018;top-down&#x2019; approach to international environment law exhibited in the UNFCCC with the &#x2018;bottom-up&#x2019; approach espoused by Agenda 21. It will be argued that, while adopting such widely differing approaches was explicable at the time, the failure to characterise the climate change regime more coherently within the sustainability context has had important ramifications in its development. Not least, the initial narrow state-centric and technocractic approach taken to climate change excluded the voices of important stakeholders from the debate shaping the international law regime, an issue that has been one of the lesser discussed factors that has impeded legal progress in this area.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>Gender and the Environment</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Routledge</publisher><placeOfPublication>London</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>climate change, ecofeminism, gender, sustainable development, women</keywords><publishedDay>9</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2015</publishedYear><publishedDate>2015-06-09</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes>Paper is a re-print in a definitive collection featuring leading scholars across a wide range of disciplines relating to gender and teh environment.</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-06-23T09:10:44.4050870</lastEdited><Created>2015-06-09T10:26:14.7492571</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Karen</firstname><surname>Morrow</surname><orcid>0000-0002-0139-5804</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2021-06-23T09:10:44.4050870 v2 21999 2015-06-09 ‘Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations’ bd81527adf441ea93955f1ccec802a0e 0000-0002-0139-5804 Karen Morrow Karen Morrow true false 2015-06-09 LAWD This publication reprints an electronic publication from Jereja Penca and Correa de Andrade (eds.), The Dominance of Climate Change in Environmental Law: Taking Stock for Rio +20 (European University Institute, 2012) which considers the approaches adopted to developing international environmental law rooted in the 1992 UNCED 1992, comparing the typical ‘top-down’ approach to international environment law exhibited in the UNFCCC with the ‘bottom-up’ approach espoused by Agenda 21. It will be argued that, while adopting such widely differing approaches was explicable at the time, the failure to characterise the climate change regime more coherently within the sustainability context has had important ramifications in its development. Not least, the initial narrow state-centric and technocractic approach taken to climate change excluded the voices of important stakeholders from the debate shaping the international law regime, an issue that has been one of the lesser discussed factors that has impeded legal progress in this area. Book chapter Gender and the Environment Routledge London climate change, ecofeminism, gender, sustainable development, women 9 6 2015 2015-06-09 Paper is a re-print in a definitive collection featuring leading scholars across a wide range of disciplines relating to gender and teh environment. COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2021-06-23T09:10:44.4050870 2015-06-09T10:26:14.7492571 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Karen Morrow 0000-0002-0139-5804 1
title ‘Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations’
spellingShingle ‘Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations’
Karen Morrow
title_short ‘Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations’
title_full ‘Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations’
title_fullStr ‘Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations’
title_full_unstemmed ‘Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations’
title_sort ‘Climate Change, Major Groups and the Importance of a Seat at the Table: Women and the UNFCC Negotiations’
author_id_str_mv bd81527adf441ea93955f1ccec802a0e
author_id_fullname_str_mv bd81527adf441ea93955f1ccec802a0e_***_Karen Morrow
author Karen Morrow
author2 Karen Morrow
format Book chapter
container_title Gender and the Environment
publishDate 2015
institution Swansea University
publisher Routledge
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description This publication reprints an electronic publication from Jereja Penca and Correa de Andrade (eds.), The Dominance of Climate Change in Environmental Law: Taking Stock for Rio +20 (European University Institute, 2012) which considers the approaches adopted to developing international environmental law rooted in the 1992 UNCED 1992, comparing the typical ‘top-down’ approach to international environment law exhibited in the UNFCCC with the ‘bottom-up’ approach espoused by Agenda 21. It will be argued that, while adopting such widely differing approaches was explicable at the time, the failure to characterise the climate change regime more coherently within the sustainability context has had important ramifications in its development. Not least, the initial narrow state-centric and technocractic approach taken to climate change excluded the voices of important stakeholders from the debate shaping the international law regime, an issue that has been one of the lesser discussed factors that has impeded legal progress in this area.
published_date 2015-06-09T03:26:09Z
_version_ 1763750937073025024
score 10.999207

Similar Items