Journal article 826 views 206 downloads
UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment
International Journal of Photoenergy, Volume: 2014, Pages: 1 - 5
Swansea University Author: Charlie Dunnill
-
PDF | Version of Record
Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-3.0)
Download (1.48MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1155/2014/407027
Abstract
A number of commercially available art protection products have been compared and assessed for their suitability as UV blocking filters in the application of “visible light” photocatalytic research. Many groups claiming visible light photocatalytic success employ filters to block out stray UV radiat...
Published in: | International Journal of Photoenergy |
---|---|
Published: |
2014
|
Online Access: |
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijp/2014/407027/ |
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa22147 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2015-06-24T02:07:08Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2019-05-31T22:15:55Z |
id |
cronfa22147 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-05-31T14:13:03.8761712</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>22147</id><entry>2015-06-23</entry><title>UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>0c4af8958eda0d2e914a5edc3210cd9e</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-4052-6931</ORCID><firstname>Charlie</firstname><surname>Dunnill</surname><name>Charlie Dunnill</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2015-06-23</date><deptcode>CHEG</deptcode><abstract>A number of commercially available art protection products have been compared and assessed for their suitability as UV blocking filters in the application of “visible light” photocatalytic research. Many groups claiming visible light photocatalytic success employ filters to block out stray UV radiation in order to justify that their photocatalysts are indeed visible light photocatalysts and not UV light photocatalysts. These filters come in varying degrees of ability and price and many authors fail to correctly characterise their filters in individual papers. The use of effective filters to prevent both false positive and false negative results is important to maintain scientific rigor and create accurate understanding of the subject. The optimum UV filter would have the highest UV blocking properties (<390 nm) and simultaneously the highest visible light transmission (390–750 nm). Single and double layers of each of the glass products were assessed as well as laminate products. The conclusions show an inexpensive and highly effective setup for the conduction of visible light photochemistry that should be incorporated as a standard part in any researcher’s work where the claim of visible light activity is made.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>International Journal of Photoenergy</journal><volume>2014</volume><paginationStart>1</paginationStart><paginationEnd>5</paginationEnd><publisher/><keywords/><publishedDay>8</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2014</publishedYear><publishedDate>2014-12-08</publishedDate><doi>10.1155/2014/407027</doi><url>http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijp/2014/407027/</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Chemical Engineering</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CHEG</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-05-31T14:13:03.8761712</lastEdited><Created>2015-06-23T16:23:53.4073987</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Charles W.</firstname><surname>Dunnill</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Charlie</firstname><surname>Dunnill</surname><orcid>0000-0003-4052-6931</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0022147-23062015162446.pdf</filename><originalFilename>407027.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2015-06-23T16:24:46.9000000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1544021</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2015-06-23T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-3.0)</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2019-05-31T14:13:03.8761712 v2 22147 2015-06-23 UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment 0c4af8958eda0d2e914a5edc3210cd9e 0000-0003-4052-6931 Charlie Dunnill Charlie Dunnill true false 2015-06-23 CHEG A number of commercially available art protection products have been compared and assessed for their suitability as UV blocking filters in the application of “visible light” photocatalytic research. Many groups claiming visible light photocatalytic success employ filters to block out stray UV radiation in order to justify that their photocatalysts are indeed visible light photocatalysts and not UV light photocatalysts. These filters come in varying degrees of ability and price and many authors fail to correctly characterise their filters in individual papers. The use of effective filters to prevent both false positive and false negative results is important to maintain scientific rigor and create accurate understanding of the subject. The optimum UV filter would have the highest UV blocking properties (<390 nm) and simultaneously the highest visible light transmission (390–750 nm). Single and double layers of each of the glass products were assessed as well as laminate products. The conclusions show an inexpensive and highly effective setup for the conduction of visible light photochemistry that should be incorporated as a standard part in any researcher’s work where the claim of visible light activity is made. Journal Article International Journal of Photoenergy 2014 1 5 8 12 2014 2014-12-08 10.1155/2014/407027 http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijp/2014/407027/ COLLEGE NANME Chemical Engineering COLLEGE CODE CHEG Swansea University 2019-05-31T14:13:03.8761712 2015-06-23T16:23:53.4073987 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering Charles W. Dunnill 1 Charlie Dunnill 0000-0003-4052-6931 2 0022147-23062015162446.pdf 407027.pdf 2015-06-23T16:24:46.9000000 Output 1544021 application/pdf Version of Record true 2015-06-23T00:00:00.0000000 Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-3.0) true |
title |
UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment |
spellingShingle |
UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment Charlie Dunnill |
title_short |
UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment |
title_full |
UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment |
title_fullStr |
UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment |
title_sort |
UV Blocking Glass: Low Cost Filters for Visible Light Photocatalytic Assessment |
author_id_str_mv |
0c4af8958eda0d2e914a5edc3210cd9e |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
0c4af8958eda0d2e914a5edc3210cd9e_***_Charlie Dunnill |
author |
Charlie Dunnill |
author2 |
Charles W. Dunnill Charlie Dunnill |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
International Journal of Photoenergy |
container_volume |
2014 |
container_start_page |
1 |
publishDate |
2014 |
institution |
Swansea University |
doi_str_mv |
10.1155/2014/407027 |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering |
url |
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijp/2014/407027/ |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
A number of commercially available art protection products have been compared and assessed for their suitability as UV blocking filters in the application of “visible light” photocatalytic research. Many groups claiming visible light photocatalytic success employ filters to block out stray UV radiation in order to justify that their photocatalysts are indeed visible light photocatalysts and not UV light photocatalysts. These filters come in varying degrees of ability and price and many authors fail to correctly characterise their filters in individual papers. The use of effective filters to prevent both false positive and false negative results is important to maintain scientific rigor and create accurate understanding of the subject. The optimum UV filter would have the highest UV blocking properties (<390 nm) and simultaneously the highest visible light transmission (390–750 nm). Single and double layers of each of the glass products were assessed as well as laminate products. The conclusions show an inexpensive and highly effective setup for the conduction of visible light photochemistry that should be incorporated as a standard part in any researcher’s work where the claim of visible light activity is made. |
published_date |
2014-12-08T03:26:21Z |
_version_ |
1763750950080610304 |
score |
11.02893 |