No Cover Image

Journal article 1326 views 282 downloads

A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour

Stuart Macdonald Orcid Logo

Modern Law Review, Volume: 69, Issue: 2, Pages: 183 - 213

Swansea University Author: Stuart Macdonald Orcid Logo

DOI (Published version): 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00581.x

Abstract

This article discusses the definition of anti-social behaviour employed by section 1(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 for the purposes of the Anti-Social Behaviour Order. It argues that, if the ASBO is to remain at the forefront of the Government's campaign against anti-social behaviour...

Full description

Published in: Modern Law Review
Published: 2006
Online Access: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00581.x/abstract
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa2285
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T11:50:56Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:30:34Z
id cronfa2285
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2016-04-19T16:01:13.9915882</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>2285</id><entry>2011-10-01</entry><title>A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-7483-9023</ORCID><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><name>Stuart Macdonald</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2011-10-01</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>This article discusses the definition of anti-social behaviour employed by section 1(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 for the purposes of the Anti-Social Behaviour Order. It argues that, if the ASBO is to remain at the forefront of the Government's campaign against anti-social behaviour, this section should be amended. The article begins by outlining the claimed benefits of, and critics' concerns about, the definition, arguing that the difference of opinion stems from different views of state power. It then argues that the ASBO has been employed for social control, often at the expense of more constructive forms of intervention, and that this has shown New Labour's willingness to vest enforcement agencies with the wide discretion conferred by section 1(1)(a) to have been misplaced. Finally, it proposes a refined version of section 1(1), which focuses the Order on the cases for which it was purportedly designed whilst maintaining any benefits of the broad definitional approach currently taken in section 1(1)(a).</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Modern Law Review</journal><volume>69</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>183</paginationStart><paginationEnd>213</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint/><keywords>Anti-social behaviour, ASBOs, human rights, rule of law</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2006</publishedYear><publishedDate>2006-03-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00581.x</doi><url>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00581.x/abstract</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2016-04-19T16:01:13.9915882</lastEdited><Created>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7483-9023</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0002285-23032016104727.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Cronfav21.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2016-03-23T10:47:27.1400000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>245074</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2008-03-01T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2016-04-19T16:01:13.9915882 v2 2285 2011-10-01 A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98 0000-0002-7483-9023 Stuart Macdonald Stuart Macdonald true false 2011-10-01 LAWD This article discusses the definition of anti-social behaviour employed by section 1(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 for the purposes of the Anti-Social Behaviour Order. It argues that, if the ASBO is to remain at the forefront of the Government's campaign against anti-social behaviour, this section should be amended. The article begins by outlining the claimed benefits of, and critics' concerns about, the definition, arguing that the difference of opinion stems from different views of state power. It then argues that the ASBO has been employed for social control, often at the expense of more constructive forms of intervention, and that this has shown New Labour's willingness to vest enforcement agencies with the wide discretion conferred by section 1(1)(a) to have been misplaced. Finally, it proposes a refined version of section 1(1), which focuses the Order on the cases for which it was purportedly designed whilst maintaining any benefits of the broad definitional approach currently taken in section 1(1)(a). Journal Article Modern Law Review 69 2 183 213 Anti-social behaviour, ASBOs, human rights, rule of law 1 3 2006 2006-03-01 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00581.x http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00581.x/abstract COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2016-04-19T16:01:13.9915882 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Stuart Macdonald 0000-0002-7483-9023 1 0002285-23032016104727.pdf Cronfav21.pdf 2016-03-23T10:47:27.1400000 Output 245074 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2008-03-01T00:00:00.0000000 true
title A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour
spellingShingle A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour
Stuart Macdonald
title_short A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour
title_full A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour
title_fullStr A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour
title_full_unstemmed A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour
title_sort A Suicidal Woman, Roaming Pigs and a Noisy Trampolinist: Refining the ASBO's Definition of Anti-Social Behaviour
author_id_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98
author_id_fullname_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98_***_Stuart Macdonald
author Stuart Macdonald
author2 Stuart Macdonald
format Journal article
container_title Modern Law Review
container_volume 69
container_issue 2
container_start_page 183
publishDate 2006
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00581.x
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00581.x/abstract
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description This article discusses the definition of anti-social behaviour employed by section 1(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 for the purposes of the Anti-Social Behaviour Order. It argues that, if the ASBO is to remain at the forefront of the Government's campaign against anti-social behaviour, this section should be amended. The article begins by outlining the claimed benefits of, and critics' concerns about, the definition, arguing that the difference of opinion stems from different views of state power. It then argues that the ASBO has been employed for social control, often at the expense of more constructive forms of intervention, and that this has shown New Labour's willingness to vest enforcement agencies with the wide discretion conferred by section 1(1)(a) to have been misplaced. Finally, it proposes a refined version of section 1(1), which focuses the Order on the cases for which it was purportedly designed whilst maintaining any benefits of the broad definitional approach currently taken in section 1(1)(a).
published_date 2006-03-01T03:05:30Z
_version_ 1763749638159990784
score 10.998116

Similar Items