No Cover Image

Journal article 442 views

The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process

Dennis Patterson

Rivista di filosofia del diritto (Italian Journal of Legal Philosophy), Volume: 3, Pages: 41 - 70

Swansea University Author: Dennis Patterson

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

Published in: Rivista di filosofia del diritto (Italian Journal of Legal Philosophy)
ISSN: 2280-482X
Published: 2014
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa26833
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2016-03-22T02:04:08Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T05:09:15Z
id cronfa26833
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2017-11-15T10:31:22.1475577</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>26833</id><entry>2016-03-21</entry><title>The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>358b915abcbaa89569da653ab5df54fe</sid><ORCID/><firstname>Dennis</firstname><surname>Patterson</surname><name>Dennis Patterson</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-03-21</date><deptcode>LLPC</deptcode><abstract/><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Rivista di filosofia del diritto (Italian Journal of Legal Philosophy)</journal><volume>3</volume><paginationStart>41</paginationStart><paginationEnd>70</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>2280-482X</issnPrint><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2014</publishedYear><publishedDate>2014-12-31</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Legal Practice &amp; Graduate Diploma Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LLPC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2017-11-15T10:31:22.1475577</lastEdited><Created>2016-03-21T18:29:14.0906128</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Dennis</firstname><surname>Patterson</surname><orcid/><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2017-11-15T10:31:22.1475577 v2 26833 2016-03-21 The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process 358b915abcbaa89569da653ab5df54fe Dennis Patterson Dennis Patterson true false 2016-03-21 LLPC Journal Article Rivista di filosofia del diritto (Italian Journal of Legal Philosophy) 3 41 70 2280-482X 31 12 2014 2014-12-31 COLLEGE NANME Legal Practice & Graduate Diploma Law COLLEGE CODE LLPC Swansea University 2017-11-15T10:31:22.1475577 2016-03-21T18:29:14.0906128 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Dennis Patterson 1
title The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process
spellingShingle The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process
Dennis Patterson
title_short The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process
title_full The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process
title_fullStr The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process
title_full_unstemmed The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process
title_sort The Gathering and Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal Trials in the United States. Compatibility with the 4th and 5th Amendments and with Due Process
author_id_str_mv 358b915abcbaa89569da653ab5df54fe
author_id_fullname_str_mv 358b915abcbaa89569da653ab5df54fe_***_Dennis Patterson
author Dennis Patterson
author2 Dennis Patterson
format Journal article
container_title Rivista di filosofia del diritto (Italian Journal of Legal Philosophy)
container_volume 3
container_start_page 41
publishDate 2014
institution Swansea University
issn 2280-482X
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
published_date 2014-12-31T03:32:20Z
_version_ 1763751326457528320
score 11.012678

Similar Items