No Cover Image

Journal article 1492 views 316 downloads

Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage

Lee Jarvis, Stuart Macdonald Orcid Logo, Andrew Whiting

Global Society, Volume: 30, Issue: 4, Pages: 605 - 623

Swansea University Author: Stuart Macdonald Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/13600826.2016.1158699

Abstract

This article explores constructions of cyberterrorism within the global news media between 2008 and 2013. It begins by arguing that the preoccupation with questions of definition, threat and response in academic literature on cyberterrorism is problematic, for two reasons. First, because it neglects...

Full description

Published in: Global Society
ISSN: 1469-798X
Published: 2016
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa26867
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2016-03-24T01:58:47Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T13:59:01Z
id cronfa26867
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2023-01-03T16:06:08.2247775</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>26867</id><entry>2016-03-23</entry><title>Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-7483-9023</ORCID><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><name>Stuart Macdonald</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-03-23</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>This article explores constructions of cyberterrorism within the global news media between 2008 and 2013. It begins by arguing that the preoccupation with questions of definition, threat and response in academic literature on cyberterrorism is problematic, for two reasons. First, because it neglects the constitutivity of representations of cyberterrorism in the news media and beyond; and, second, because it prioritises policy-relevant research. To address this, the article provides a discursive analysis drawing on original empirical research into 31 news media outlets across the world. Although there is genuine heterogeneity in representations of cyberterrorism therein, we argue that constructions of this threat rely heavily on two strategies. First, appeals to authoritative or expert &#x2018;witnesses&#x2019; and their institutional or epistemic credibility. And, second, generic or historical analogies, which help shape understanding of the likelihood and consequences of cyberterrorist attack. These strategies have particularly discursive importance, we argue, given the lack of readily available empirical examples of the &#x2018;reality&#x2019; of cyberterrorism</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Global Society</journal><volume>30</volume><journalNumber>4</journalNumber><paginationStart>605</paginationStart><paginationEnd>623</paginationEnd><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>1469-798X</issnElectronic><keywords>cyberterrorism; discourse; news; media; terrorism</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2016</publishedYear><publishedDate>2016-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/13600826.2016.1158699</doi><url>http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600826.2016.1158699</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-01-03T16:06:08.2247775</lastEdited><Created>2016-03-23T08:46:35.5429838</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Lee</firstname><surname>Jarvis</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7483-9023</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Whiting</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0026867-23032016085831.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Cronfav6.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2016-03-23T08:58:31.9700000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>565379</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2017-10-20T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2023-01-03T16:06:08.2247775 v2 26867 2016-03-23 Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98 0000-0002-7483-9023 Stuart Macdonald Stuart Macdonald true false 2016-03-23 LAWD This article explores constructions of cyberterrorism within the global news media between 2008 and 2013. It begins by arguing that the preoccupation with questions of definition, threat and response in academic literature on cyberterrorism is problematic, for two reasons. First, because it neglects the constitutivity of representations of cyberterrorism in the news media and beyond; and, second, because it prioritises policy-relevant research. To address this, the article provides a discursive analysis drawing on original empirical research into 31 news media outlets across the world. Although there is genuine heterogeneity in representations of cyberterrorism therein, we argue that constructions of this threat rely heavily on two strategies. First, appeals to authoritative or expert ‘witnesses’ and their institutional or epistemic credibility. And, second, generic or historical analogies, which help shape understanding of the likelihood and consequences of cyberterrorist attack. These strategies have particularly discursive importance, we argue, given the lack of readily available empirical examples of the ‘reality’ of cyberterrorism Journal Article Global Society 30 4 605 623 1469-798X cyberterrorism; discourse; news; media; terrorism 31 12 2016 2016-12-31 10.1080/13600826.2016.1158699 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600826.2016.1158699 COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2023-01-03T16:06:08.2247775 2016-03-23T08:46:35.5429838 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Lee Jarvis 1 Stuart Macdonald 0000-0002-7483-9023 2 Andrew Whiting 3 0026867-23032016085831.pdf Cronfav6.pdf 2016-03-23T08:58:31.9700000 Output 565379 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2017-10-20T00:00:00.0000000 true
title Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage
spellingShingle Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage
Stuart Macdonald
title_short Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage
title_full Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage
title_fullStr Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage
title_full_unstemmed Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage
title_sort Analogy and Authority in Cyberterrorism Discourse: An Analysis of Global News Media Coverage
author_id_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98
author_id_fullname_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98_***_Stuart Macdonald
author Stuart Macdonald
author2 Lee Jarvis
Stuart Macdonald
Andrew Whiting
format Journal article
container_title Global Society
container_volume 30
container_issue 4
container_start_page 605
publishDate 2016
institution Swansea University
issn 1469-798X
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13600826.2016.1158699
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600826.2016.1158699
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description This article explores constructions of cyberterrorism within the global news media between 2008 and 2013. It begins by arguing that the preoccupation with questions of definition, threat and response in academic literature on cyberterrorism is problematic, for two reasons. First, because it neglects the constitutivity of representations of cyberterrorism in the news media and beyond; and, second, because it prioritises policy-relevant research. To address this, the article provides a discursive analysis drawing on original empirical research into 31 news media outlets across the world. Although there is genuine heterogeneity in representations of cyberterrorism therein, we argue that constructions of this threat rely heavily on two strategies. First, appeals to authoritative or expert ‘witnesses’ and their institutional or epistemic credibility. And, second, generic or historical analogies, which help shape understanding of the likelihood and consequences of cyberterrorist attack. These strategies have particularly discursive importance, we argue, given the lack of readily available empirical examples of the ‘reality’ of cyberterrorism
published_date 2016-12-31T03:32:24Z
_version_ 1763751330209333248
score 11.017797

Similar Items