Book chapter 2322 views
Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production
Routledge Handbook of Political Economy of Science
Swansea University Author: Christopher Muellerleile
Abstract
This chapter argues that despite the spin it normally receives, open access journal publishing is only one component of a larger dialectic of new openings and closures in academic journal publishing. Most importantly the paper argues that the context of open publishing is quickly being economized by...
Published in: | Routledge Handbook of Political Economy of Science |
---|---|
Published: |
2017
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa28111 |
first_indexed |
2016-06-10T12:20:12Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-02-09T05:11:53Z |
id |
cronfa28111 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2017-07-20T17:00:47.1634757</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>28111</id><entry>2016-05-20</entry><title>Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>62c8e47d6145081a464eadba0ff5c942</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-9685-6345</ORCID><firstname>Christopher</firstname><surname>Muellerleile</surname><name>Christopher Muellerleile</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-05-20</date><deptcode>BGPS</deptcode><abstract>This chapter argues that despite the spin it normally receives, open access journal publishing is only one component of a larger dialectic of new openings and closures in academic journal publishing. Most importantly the paper argues that the context of open publishing is quickly being economized by for-profit publishers. Contrary to the beliefs of many academic researchers and curators of journals, the emergent open access economy is based not on the content of research articles, but on meta-data, bibliometrics, and other quantitative data. This informational economy is filtered and framed by for-profit firms, and constituted by new spaces of standardization, metrics, comparison, and competition. This chapter offers a brief overview of the current journal publishing landscape, focusing on the transition to open access in the UK and U.S. It then explores the emerging strategies of academic researchers, universities, and publishers in light of the growing (over)abundance of academic knowledge, much of which is fueled by open access.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>Routledge Handbook of Political Economy of Science</journal><publisher/><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-12-31</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Biosciences Geography and Physics School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BGPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2017-07-20T17:00:47.1634757</lastEdited><Created>2016-05-20T10:30:10.8382979</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Geography</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Christopher</firstname><surname>Muellerleile</surname><orcid>0000-0001-9685-6345</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2017-07-20T17:00:47.1634757 v2 28111 2016-05-20 Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production 62c8e47d6145081a464eadba0ff5c942 0000-0001-9685-6345 Christopher Muellerleile Christopher Muellerleile true false 2016-05-20 BGPS This chapter argues that despite the spin it normally receives, open access journal publishing is only one component of a larger dialectic of new openings and closures in academic journal publishing. Most importantly the paper argues that the context of open publishing is quickly being economized by for-profit publishers. Contrary to the beliefs of many academic researchers and curators of journals, the emergent open access economy is based not on the content of research articles, but on meta-data, bibliometrics, and other quantitative data. This informational economy is filtered and framed by for-profit firms, and constituted by new spaces of standardization, metrics, comparison, and competition. This chapter offers a brief overview of the current journal publishing landscape, focusing on the transition to open access in the UK and U.S. It then explores the emerging strategies of academic researchers, universities, and publishers in light of the growing (over)abundance of academic knowledge, much of which is fueled by open access. Book chapter Routledge Handbook of Political Economy of Science 31 12 2017 2017-12-31 COLLEGE NANME Biosciences Geography and Physics School COLLEGE CODE BGPS Swansea University 2017-07-20T17:00:47.1634757 2016-05-20T10:30:10.8382979 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Geography Christopher Muellerleile 0000-0001-9685-6345 1 |
title |
Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production |
spellingShingle |
Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production Christopher Muellerleile |
title_short |
Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production |
title_full |
Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production |
title_fullStr |
Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production |
title_full_unstemmed |
Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production |
title_sort |
Open Access Panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production |
author_id_str_mv |
62c8e47d6145081a464eadba0ff5c942 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
62c8e47d6145081a464eadba0ff5c942_***_Christopher Muellerleile |
author |
Christopher Muellerleile |
author2 |
Christopher Muellerleile |
format |
Book chapter |
container_title |
Routledge Handbook of Political Economy of Science |
publishDate |
2017 |
institution |
Swansea University |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Geography{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Geography |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This chapter argues that despite the spin it normally receives, open access journal publishing is only one component of a larger dialectic of new openings and closures in academic journal publishing. Most importantly the paper argues that the context of open publishing is quickly being economized by for-profit publishers. Contrary to the beliefs of many academic researchers and curators of journals, the emergent open access economy is based not on the content of research articles, but on meta-data, bibliometrics, and other quantitative data. This informational economy is filtered and framed by for-profit firms, and constituted by new spaces of standardization, metrics, comparison, and competition. This chapter offers a brief overview of the current journal publishing landscape, focusing on the transition to open access in the UK and U.S. It then explores the emerging strategies of academic researchers, universities, and publishers in light of the growing (over)abundance of academic knowledge, much of which is fueled by open access. |
published_date |
2017-12-31T06:59:28Z |
_version_ |
1821931385834700800 |
score |
11.048085 |