Journal article 1399 views
Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits
Political Geography, Volume: 46, Pages: 76 - 88
Swansea University Author: Emel Akcali
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.004
Abstract
By discussing the variety and variability of urban neoliberal governmentality and its limits in the semiperipheryof the advanced capitalist world, the article aims to explore the embeddedness of neoliberalismat the dawn of the new millennium. Cities that are increasingly becoming parts of the global...
Published in: | Political Geography |
---|---|
ISSN: | 09626298 |
Published: |
2015
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa29514 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2016-09-01T12:52:09Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-09-20T12:29:28Z |
id |
cronfa29514 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-09-20T11:17:54.9623224</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>29514</id><entry>2016-08-09</entry><title>Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>12ffa0cb3d251bf610bc6d6c3344236a</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-1461-0331</ORCID><firstname>Emel</firstname><surname>Akcali</surname><name>Emel Akcali</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-08-09</date><deptcode>APC</deptcode><abstract>By discussing the variety and variability of urban neoliberal governmentality and its limits in the semiperipheryof the advanced capitalist world, the article aims to explore the embeddedness of neoliberalismat the dawn of the new millennium. Cities that are increasingly becoming parts of the globaleconomy, despite being on the periphery of advanced capitalism, host a myriad of diverse forms ofneoliberal governmentality in terms of spatial change. Although responding with enthusiasm to theincreasing mobility of capital and the internationalization of investments through gentrification plans,the current transformative efforts of Istanbul and Budapest under two conservative governments indicate,for instance, the re-invention of authoritarianism so that these cities serve the purposes of theirnational leaders. This development signals a hybrid form of governmentality that combines neoliberalismwith illiberal logics and manifests similar processes in different locations despite disparities inscale, local needs and characteristics. The article further argues that since such urban transformationstake place within the neo-conservative leaders' battles to acquire cultural and social capital, they createpotential to make both metropolises the new rebel cities of Europe, albeit with divergent levels ofresistance.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Political Geography</journal><volume>46</volume><paginationStart>76</paginationStart><paginationEnd>88</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>09626298</issnPrint><keywords>Public space Gentrification Neoliberal governmentality Neo-authoritarianism Right to the city</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2015</publishedYear><publishedDate>2015-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.004</doi><url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.004</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>APC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2018-09-20T11:17:54.9623224</lastEdited><Created>2016-08-09T22:53:46.0270642</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Emel</firstname><surname>Akçalı</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Umut</firstname><surname>Korkut</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Emel</firstname><surname>Akcali</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1461-0331</orcid><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2018-09-20T11:17:54.9623224 v2 29514 2016-08-09 Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits 12ffa0cb3d251bf610bc6d6c3344236a 0000-0002-1461-0331 Emel Akcali Emel Akcali true false 2016-08-09 APC By discussing the variety and variability of urban neoliberal governmentality and its limits in the semiperipheryof the advanced capitalist world, the article aims to explore the embeddedness of neoliberalismat the dawn of the new millennium. Cities that are increasingly becoming parts of the globaleconomy, despite being on the periphery of advanced capitalism, host a myriad of diverse forms ofneoliberal governmentality in terms of spatial change. Although responding with enthusiasm to theincreasing mobility of capital and the internationalization of investments through gentrification plans,the current transformative efforts of Istanbul and Budapest under two conservative governments indicate,for instance, the re-invention of authoritarianism so that these cities serve the purposes of theirnational leaders. This development signals a hybrid form of governmentality that combines neoliberalismwith illiberal logics and manifests similar processes in different locations despite disparities inscale, local needs and characteristics. The article further argues that since such urban transformationstake place within the neo-conservative leaders' battles to acquire cultural and social capital, they createpotential to make both metropolises the new rebel cities of Europe, albeit with divergent levels ofresistance. Journal Article Political Geography 46 76 88 09626298 Public space Gentrification Neoliberal governmentality Neo-authoritarianism Right to the city 31 12 2015 2015-12-31 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.004 COLLEGE NANME Politics, Philosophy and International Relations COLLEGE CODE APC Swansea University 2018-09-20T11:17:54.9623224 2016-08-09T22:53:46.0270642 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Emel Akçalı 1 Umut Korkut 2 Emel Akcali 0000-0002-1461-0331 3 |
title |
Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits |
spellingShingle |
Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits Emel Akcali |
title_short |
Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits |
title_full |
Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits |
title_fullStr |
Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits |
title_full_unstemmed |
Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits |
title_sort |
Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU's semi-periphery and its limits |
author_id_str_mv |
12ffa0cb3d251bf610bc6d6c3344236a |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
12ffa0cb3d251bf610bc6d6c3344236a_***_Emel Akcali |
author |
Emel Akcali |
author2 |
Emel Akçalı Umut Korkut Emel Akcali |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Political Geography |
container_volume |
46 |
container_start_page |
76 |
publishDate |
2015 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
09626298 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.004 |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.004 |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
By discussing the variety and variability of urban neoliberal governmentality and its limits in the semiperipheryof the advanced capitalist world, the article aims to explore the embeddedness of neoliberalismat the dawn of the new millennium. Cities that are increasingly becoming parts of the globaleconomy, despite being on the periphery of advanced capitalism, host a myriad of diverse forms ofneoliberal governmentality in terms of spatial change. Although responding with enthusiasm to theincreasing mobility of capital and the internationalization of investments through gentrification plans,the current transformative efforts of Istanbul and Budapest under two conservative governments indicate,for instance, the re-invention of authoritarianism so that these cities serve the purposes of theirnational leaders. This development signals a hybrid form of governmentality that combines neoliberalismwith illiberal logics and manifests similar processes in different locations despite disparities inscale, local needs and characteristics. The article further argues that since such urban transformationstake place within the neo-conservative leaders' battles to acquire cultural and social capital, they createpotential to make both metropolises the new rebel cities of Europe, albeit with divergent levels ofresistance. |
published_date |
2015-12-31T03:35:54Z |
_version_ |
1763751550712283136 |
score |
11.036116 |