No Cover Image

Book 695 views

Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition.

John Martyn Chamberlain, Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

Swansea University Author: Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

Abstract

This book is concerned with the sociological analysis of the professions and professional self-regulation. This is the view that professionals such as doctors should be left alone to manage their own affairs in regards to members training, practice and discipline. Over the last two decades social sc...

Full description

Published: Nova Science Publishers 2009
Online Access: https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=10791
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa29698
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2016-09-02T18:55:06Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T05:14:58Z
id cronfa29698
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2016-12-01T14:35:03.7127441</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>29698</id><entry>2016-09-02</entry><title>Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition.</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6067-6561</ORCID><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><name>Marty Chamberlain</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-09-02</date><deptcode>CRIM</deptcode><abstract>This book is concerned with the sociological analysis of the professions and professional self-regulation. This is the view that professionals such as doctors should be left alone to manage their own affairs in regards to members training, practice and discipline. Over the last two decades social scientists from the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have discussed how governments are increasingly acting to open up the previously &#x2018;closed shop&#x2019; field of professional regulation. Indeed, many have been vocal advocates of the need to promote greater inter-professional cooperation and managerial and public involvement in the regulation of professional forms of expertise. The United Kingdom is no exception. A series of high profile medical malpractice cases have caused sociologists to join patient rights advocates, lawyers, politicians and the media in calling for reforms in the regulation of doctors. Grounded in contemporary health and social policy developments in the United Kingdom, including the 2008 Health and Social Care Act, this book undertakes an in-depth analysis of the development of the principle of professional self-regulation in relation to the evolution of the modern medical profession and contemporary calls for reform in the governance of doctors. In doing so it highlights how medical elites are advocating a new medical professionalism, sometimes called professionally-led medical regulation, as they seek to maintain the principle of medical self-regulation, albeit in a new more publicly accountable form. Against this background the results of original empirical research undertaken with doctors to identify their experiences and perceptions of these reforms is presented and analyzed in light of current policy developments as well as relevant theoretical sociological frameworks.</abstract><type>Book</type><journal/><publisher>Nova Science Publishers</publisher><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>Medical Regulation; Medical Law; Medical Sociology</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2009</publishedYear><publishedDate>2009-06-01</publishedDate><doi/><url>https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=10791</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Criminology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CRIM</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2016-12-01T14:35:03.7127441</lastEdited><Created>2016-09-02T12:38:09.9733369</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>John Martyn</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6067-6561</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2016-12-01T14:35:03.7127441 v2 29698 2016-09-02 Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition. 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144 0000-0001-6067-6561 Marty Chamberlain Marty Chamberlain true false 2016-09-02 CRIM This book is concerned with the sociological analysis of the professions and professional self-regulation. This is the view that professionals such as doctors should be left alone to manage their own affairs in regards to members training, practice and discipline. Over the last two decades social scientists from the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have discussed how governments are increasingly acting to open up the previously ‘closed shop’ field of professional regulation. Indeed, many have been vocal advocates of the need to promote greater inter-professional cooperation and managerial and public involvement in the regulation of professional forms of expertise. The United Kingdom is no exception. A series of high profile medical malpractice cases have caused sociologists to join patient rights advocates, lawyers, politicians and the media in calling for reforms in the regulation of doctors. Grounded in contemporary health and social policy developments in the United Kingdom, including the 2008 Health and Social Care Act, this book undertakes an in-depth analysis of the development of the principle of professional self-regulation in relation to the evolution of the modern medical profession and contemporary calls for reform in the governance of doctors. In doing so it highlights how medical elites are advocating a new medical professionalism, sometimes called professionally-led medical regulation, as they seek to maintain the principle of medical self-regulation, albeit in a new more publicly accountable form. Against this background the results of original empirical research undertaken with doctors to identify their experiences and perceptions of these reforms is presented and analyzed in light of current policy developments as well as relevant theoretical sociological frameworks. Book Nova Science Publishers Medical Regulation; Medical Law; Medical Sociology 1 6 2009 2009-06-01 https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=10791 COLLEGE NANME Criminology COLLEGE CODE CRIM Swansea University 2016-12-01T14:35:03.7127441 2016-09-02T12:38:09.9733369 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law John Martyn Chamberlain 1 Marty Chamberlain 0000-0001-6067-6561 2
title Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition.
spellingShingle Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition.
Marty Chamberlain
title_short Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition.
title_full Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition.
title_fullStr Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition.
title_full_unstemmed Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition.
title_sort Doctoring Medical Governance: Medical Self-Regulation in Transition.
author_id_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144
author_id_fullname_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144_***_Marty Chamberlain
author Marty Chamberlain
author2 John Martyn Chamberlain
Marty Chamberlain
format Book
publishDate 2009
institution Swansea University
publisher Nova Science Publishers
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=10791
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description This book is concerned with the sociological analysis of the professions and professional self-regulation. This is the view that professionals such as doctors should be left alone to manage their own affairs in regards to members training, practice and discipline. Over the last two decades social scientists from the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have discussed how governments are increasingly acting to open up the previously ‘closed shop’ field of professional regulation. Indeed, many have been vocal advocates of the need to promote greater inter-professional cooperation and managerial and public involvement in the regulation of professional forms of expertise. The United Kingdom is no exception. A series of high profile medical malpractice cases have caused sociologists to join patient rights advocates, lawyers, politicians and the media in calling for reforms in the regulation of doctors. Grounded in contemporary health and social policy developments in the United Kingdom, including the 2008 Health and Social Care Act, this book undertakes an in-depth analysis of the development of the principle of professional self-regulation in relation to the evolution of the modern medical profession and contemporary calls for reform in the governance of doctors. In doing so it highlights how medical elites are advocating a new medical professionalism, sometimes called professionally-led medical regulation, as they seek to maintain the principle of medical self-regulation, albeit in a new more publicly accountable form. Against this background the results of original empirical research undertaken with doctors to identify their experiences and perceptions of these reforms is presented and analyzed in light of current policy developments as well as relevant theoretical sociological frameworks.
published_date 2009-06-01T03:36:08Z
_version_ 1763751565788708864
score 11.036706

Similar Items