No Cover Image

Journal article 652 views

Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond

John Martyn Chamberlain, Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

Medical Sociology Online, Volume: 8, Issue: 1, Pages: 32 - 44

Swansea University Author: Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

Abstract

This paper is concerned with contemporary reforms to the institutional body responsible for overseeing the regulation of the medical profession in the United Kingdom: the General Medical Council (GMC). Recently the state has introduced legislation which has changed the organisation of the GMC and ho...

Full description

Published in: Medical Sociology Online
ISSN: 1757-8310
Published: 2014
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa29707
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2016-09-02T18:55:08Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T05:15:00Z
id cronfa29707
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2017-03-29T15:23:42.0924704</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>29707</id><entry>2016-09-02</entry><title>Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6067-6561</ORCID><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><name>Marty Chamberlain</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-09-02</date><deptcode>CRIM</deptcode><abstract>This paper is concerned with contemporary reforms to the institutional body responsible for overseeing the regulation of the medical profession in the United Kingdom: the General Medical Council (GMC). Recently the state has introduced legislation which has changed the organisation of the GMC and how it ensures medical practitioners are fit to practice. It is argued that these changes provide supportive evidence for the restratification thesis. This holds that rank and file practitioners are becoming subject to greater peer appraisal and review as a result of external pressure to reform medical governance and increase professional accountability mechanisms. But it is also noted that reforms in medical regulation are bound up with a broader shift in how good governance is conceptualised and operationalized under neo-liberal mentalities of rule as the state seeks to promote at a distance a certain type of citizen-subject congruent with the enterprise form within the risk saturated conditions associated with high modernity. The paper concludes that it is important to investigate contemporary reforms in the regulation of doctors while also bearing in mind the broader socio-political context so social scientists can better contribute to current debate concerning how best to regulate professional forms of expertise.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Medical Sociology Online</journal><volume>8</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>32</paginationStart><paginationEnd>44</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnElectronic>1757-8310</issnElectronic><keywords>General Medical Council, Governmentality, Medical Profession, Medical Regulation, Restratification</keywords><publishedDay>2</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2014</publishedYear><publishedDate>2014-02-02</publishedDate><doi/><url>http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org/resources/MSo-&amp;amp;-MSN-Archive/MSo_v.8/MSo-8.1.pdf</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Criminology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CRIM</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2017-03-29T15:23:42.0924704</lastEdited><Created>2016-09-02T17:13:45.0294199</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>John Martyn</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6067-6561</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2017-03-29T15:23:42.0924704 v2 29707 2016-09-02 Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144 0000-0001-6067-6561 Marty Chamberlain Marty Chamberlain true false 2016-09-02 CRIM This paper is concerned with contemporary reforms to the institutional body responsible for overseeing the regulation of the medical profession in the United Kingdom: the General Medical Council (GMC). Recently the state has introduced legislation which has changed the organisation of the GMC and how it ensures medical practitioners are fit to practice. It is argued that these changes provide supportive evidence for the restratification thesis. This holds that rank and file practitioners are becoming subject to greater peer appraisal and review as a result of external pressure to reform medical governance and increase professional accountability mechanisms. But it is also noted that reforms in medical regulation are bound up with a broader shift in how good governance is conceptualised and operationalized under neo-liberal mentalities of rule as the state seeks to promote at a distance a certain type of citizen-subject congruent with the enterprise form within the risk saturated conditions associated with high modernity. The paper concludes that it is important to investigate contemporary reforms in the regulation of doctors while also bearing in mind the broader socio-political context so social scientists can better contribute to current debate concerning how best to regulate professional forms of expertise. Journal Article Medical Sociology Online 8 1 32 44 1757-8310 General Medical Council, Governmentality, Medical Profession, Medical Regulation, Restratification 2 2 2014 2014-02-02 http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org/resources/MSo-&amp;-MSN-Archive/MSo_v.8/MSo-8.1.pdf COLLEGE NANME Criminology COLLEGE CODE CRIM Swansea University 2017-03-29T15:23:42.0924704 2016-09-02T17:13:45.0294199 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law John Martyn Chamberlain 1 Marty Chamberlain 0000-0001-6067-6561 2
title Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond
spellingShingle Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond
Marty Chamberlain
title_short Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond
title_full Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond
title_fullStr Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond
title_full_unstemmed Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond
title_sort Reforming Medical Regulation in the United Kingdom: From Restratification to Governmentality and Beyond
author_id_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144
author_id_fullname_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144_***_Marty Chamberlain
author Marty Chamberlain
author2 John Martyn Chamberlain
Marty Chamberlain
format Journal article
container_title Medical Sociology Online
container_volume 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page 32
publishDate 2014
institution Swansea University
issn 1757-8310
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org/resources/MSo-&amp;-MSN-Archive/MSo_v.8/MSo-8.1.pdf
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description This paper is concerned with contemporary reforms to the institutional body responsible for overseeing the regulation of the medical profession in the United Kingdom: the General Medical Council (GMC). Recently the state has introduced legislation which has changed the organisation of the GMC and how it ensures medical practitioners are fit to practice. It is argued that these changes provide supportive evidence for the restratification thesis. This holds that rank and file practitioners are becoming subject to greater peer appraisal and review as a result of external pressure to reform medical governance and increase professional accountability mechanisms. But it is also noted that reforms in medical regulation are bound up with a broader shift in how good governance is conceptualised and operationalized under neo-liberal mentalities of rule as the state seeks to promote at a distance a certain type of citizen-subject congruent with the enterprise form within the risk saturated conditions associated with high modernity. The paper concludes that it is important to investigate contemporary reforms in the regulation of doctors while also bearing in mind the broader socio-political context so social scientists can better contribute to current debate concerning how best to regulate professional forms of expertise.
published_date 2014-02-02T03:36:09Z
_version_ 1763751566646444032
score 11.012678

Similar Items