No Cover Image

Journal article 594 views 139 downloads

The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas

John Martyn Chamberlain, Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

Health, Risk & Society, Volume: 13, Issue: 6, Pages: 561 - 575

Swansea University Author: Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/13698575.2011.613984

Abstract

Over the last three decades a risk-based model of medical regulation has emerged in the United Kingdom. To promote a risk-averse operational culture of transparency and professional accountability the regulatory state has intervened in medical governance and introduced best-evidenced practice framew...

Full description

Published in: Health, Risk & Society
Published: 2011
Online Access: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/chrs20/current
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa29711
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2016-09-02T18:55:09Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T05:15:00Z
id cronfa29711
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2017-05-11T09:46:54.0779525</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>29711</id><entry>2016-09-02</entry><title>The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6067-6561</ORCID><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><name>Marty Chamberlain</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-09-02</date><deptcode>CRIM</deptcode><abstract>Over the last three decades a risk-based model of medical regulation has emerged in the United Kingdom. To promote a risk-averse operational culture of transparency and professional accountability the regulatory state has intervened in medical governance and introduced best-evidenced practice frameworks, audit and performance appraisal, Against this background the paper analyses descriptive statistical data pertaining to the General Medical Council&#x2019;s management of the process by which fitness to practice complaints against doctors are dealt with from initial receipt through to subsequent investigative and adjudication stages. Statistical trends are outlined regarding complaint data in relation to a doctor&#x2019;s gender and race and ethnicity. The data shows that there has been an increase in rehabilitative and/or punitive action against doctors. In light of its findings the paper considers what the long-term consequences may be, for both patients and doctors, of the increasing use of risk-averse administrative systems to reform medical regulation and ensure professional accountability.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Health, Risk &amp; Society</journal><volume>13</volume><journalNumber>6</journalNumber><paginationStart>561</paginationStart><paginationEnd>575</paginationEnd><publisher/><keywords>Complaints, Fitness to Practice, General Medical Council, Medical Regulation, Professional Self-Regulation, Risk</keywords><publishedDay>22</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2011</publishedYear><publishedDate>2011-09-22</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/13698575.2011.613984</doi><url>http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/chrs20/current</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Criminology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CRIM</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2017-05-11T09:46:54.0779525</lastEdited><Created>2016-09-02T18:06:02.1159259</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>John Martyn</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6067-6561</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0029711-11052017094606.pdf</filename><originalFilename>HRSChamberlain.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-05-11T09:46:06.5900000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>402746</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2017-05-11T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2017-05-11T09:46:54.0779525 v2 29711 2016-09-02 The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144 0000-0001-6067-6561 Marty Chamberlain Marty Chamberlain true false 2016-09-02 CRIM Over the last three decades a risk-based model of medical regulation has emerged in the United Kingdom. To promote a risk-averse operational culture of transparency and professional accountability the regulatory state has intervened in medical governance and introduced best-evidenced practice frameworks, audit and performance appraisal, Against this background the paper analyses descriptive statistical data pertaining to the General Medical Council’s management of the process by which fitness to practice complaints against doctors are dealt with from initial receipt through to subsequent investigative and adjudication stages. Statistical trends are outlined regarding complaint data in relation to a doctor’s gender and race and ethnicity. The data shows that there has been an increase in rehabilitative and/or punitive action against doctors. In light of its findings the paper considers what the long-term consequences may be, for both patients and doctors, of the increasing use of risk-averse administrative systems to reform medical regulation and ensure professional accountability. Journal Article Health, Risk & Society 13 6 561 575 Complaints, Fitness to Practice, General Medical Council, Medical Regulation, Professional Self-Regulation, Risk 22 9 2011 2011-09-22 10.1080/13698575.2011.613984 http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/chrs20/current COLLEGE NANME Criminology COLLEGE CODE CRIM Swansea University 2017-05-11T09:46:54.0779525 2016-09-02T18:06:02.1159259 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law John Martyn Chamberlain 1 Marty Chamberlain 0000-0001-6067-6561 2 0029711-11052017094606.pdf HRSChamberlain.pdf 2017-05-11T09:46:06.5900000 Output 402746 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2017-05-11T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas
spellingShingle The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas
Marty Chamberlain
title_short The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas
title_full The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas
title_fullStr The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas
title_full_unstemmed The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas
title_sort The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas
author_id_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144
author_id_fullname_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144_***_Marty Chamberlain
author Marty Chamberlain
author2 John Martyn Chamberlain
Marty Chamberlain
format Journal article
container_title Health, Risk & Society
container_volume 13
container_issue 6
container_start_page 561
publishDate 2011
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13698575.2011.613984
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/chrs20/current
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Over the last three decades a risk-based model of medical regulation has emerged in the United Kingdom. To promote a risk-averse operational culture of transparency and professional accountability the regulatory state has intervened in medical governance and introduced best-evidenced practice frameworks, audit and performance appraisal, Against this background the paper analyses descriptive statistical data pertaining to the General Medical Council’s management of the process by which fitness to practice complaints against doctors are dealt with from initial receipt through to subsequent investigative and adjudication stages. Statistical trends are outlined regarding complaint data in relation to a doctor’s gender and race and ethnicity. The data shows that there has been an increase in rehabilitative and/or punitive action against doctors. In light of its findings the paper considers what the long-term consequences may be, for both patients and doctors, of the increasing use of risk-averse administrative systems to reform medical regulation and ensure professional accountability.
published_date 2011-09-22T03:36:10Z
_version_ 1763751567138226176
score 11.012678