Journal article 677 views 161 downloads
The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas
Health, Risk & Society, Volume: 13, Issue: 6, Pages: 561 - 575
Swansea University Author: Marty Chamberlain
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Download (328.85KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/13698575.2011.613984
Abstract
Over the last three decades a risk-based model of medical regulation has emerged in the United Kingdom. To promote a risk-averse operational culture of transparency and professional accountability the regulatory state has intervened in medical governance and introduced best-evidenced practice framew...
Published in: | Health, Risk & Society |
---|---|
Published: |
2011
|
Online Access: |
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/chrs20/current |
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa29711 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2016-09-02T18:55:09Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-02-09T05:15:00Z |
id |
cronfa29711 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2017-05-11T09:46:54.0779525</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>29711</id><entry>2016-09-02</entry><title>The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6067-6561</ORCID><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><name>Marty Chamberlain</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-09-02</date><deptcode>CRIM</deptcode><abstract>Over the last three decades a risk-based model of medical regulation has emerged in the United Kingdom. To promote a risk-averse operational culture of transparency and professional accountability the regulatory state has intervened in medical governance and introduced best-evidenced practice frameworks, audit and performance appraisal, Against this background the paper analyses descriptive statistical data pertaining to the General Medical Council’s management of the process by which fitness to practice complaints against doctors are dealt with from initial receipt through to subsequent investigative and adjudication stages. Statistical trends are outlined regarding complaint data in relation to a doctor’s gender and race and ethnicity. The data shows that there has been an increase in rehabilitative and/or punitive action against doctors. In light of its findings the paper considers what the long-term consequences may be, for both patients and doctors, of the increasing use of risk-averse administrative systems to reform medical regulation and ensure professional accountability.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Health, Risk & Society</journal><volume>13</volume><journalNumber>6</journalNumber><paginationStart>561</paginationStart><paginationEnd>575</paginationEnd><publisher/><keywords>Complaints, Fitness to Practice, General Medical Council, Medical Regulation, Professional Self-Regulation, Risk</keywords><publishedDay>22</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2011</publishedYear><publishedDate>2011-09-22</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/13698575.2011.613984</doi><url>http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/chrs20/current</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Criminology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CRIM</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2017-05-11T09:46:54.0779525</lastEdited><Created>2016-09-02T18:06:02.1159259</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>John Martyn</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6067-6561</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0029711-11052017094606.pdf</filename><originalFilename>HRSChamberlain.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-05-11T09:46:06.5900000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>402746</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2017-05-11T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2017-05-11T09:46:54.0779525 v2 29711 2016-09-02 The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144 0000-0001-6067-6561 Marty Chamberlain Marty Chamberlain true false 2016-09-02 CRIM Over the last three decades a risk-based model of medical regulation has emerged in the United Kingdom. To promote a risk-averse operational culture of transparency and professional accountability the regulatory state has intervened in medical governance and introduced best-evidenced practice frameworks, audit and performance appraisal, Against this background the paper analyses descriptive statistical data pertaining to the General Medical Council’s management of the process by which fitness to practice complaints against doctors are dealt with from initial receipt through to subsequent investigative and adjudication stages. Statistical trends are outlined regarding complaint data in relation to a doctor’s gender and race and ethnicity. The data shows that there has been an increase in rehabilitative and/or punitive action against doctors. In light of its findings the paper considers what the long-term consequences may be, for both patients and doctors, of the increasing use of risk-averse administrative systems to reform medical regulation and ensure professional accountability. Journal Article Health, Risk & Society 13 6 561 575 Complaints, Fitness to Practice, General Medical Council, Medical Regulation, Professional Self-Regulation, Risk 22 9 2011 2011-09-22 10.1080/13698575.2011.613984 http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/chrs20/current COLLEGE NANME Criminology COLLEGE CODE CRIM Swansea University 2017-05-11T09:46:54.0779525 2016-09-02T18:06:02.1159259 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law John Martyn Chamberlain 1 Marty Chamberlain 0000-0001-6067-6561 2 0029711-11052017094606.pdf HRSChamberlain.pdf 2017-05-11T09:46:06.5900000 Output 402746 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2017-05-11T00:00:00.0000000 true eng |
title |
The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas |
spellingShingle |
The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas Marty Chamberlain |
title_short |
The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas |
title_full |
The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas |
title_fullStr |
The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas |
title_full_unstemmed |
The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas |
title_sort |
The hearing of fitness to practice cases by the General Medical Council: Current trends and future research agendas |
author_id_str_mv |
98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144_***_Marty Chamberlain |
author |
Marty Chamberlain |
author2 |
John Martyn Chamberlain Marty Chamberlain |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Health, Risk & Society |
container_volume |
13 |
container_issue |
6 |
container_start_page |
561 |
publishDate |
2011 |
institution |
Swansea University |
doi_str_mv |
10.1080/13698575.2011.613984 |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
url |
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/chrs20/current |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Over the last three decades a risk-based model of medical regulation has emerged in the United Kingdom. To promote a risk-averse operational culture of transparency and professional accountability the regulatory state has intervened in medical governance and introduced best-evidenced practice frameworks, audit and performance appraisal, Against this background the paper analyses descriptive statistical data pertaining to the General Medical Council’s management of the process by which fitness to practice complaints against doctors are dealt with from initial receipt through to subsequent investigative and adjudication stages. Statistical trends are outlined regarding complaint data in relation to a doctor’s gender and race and ethnicity. The data shows that there has been an increase in rehabilitative and/or punitive action against doctors. In light of its findings the paper considers what the long-term consequences may be, for both patients and doctors, of the increasing use of risk-averse administrative systems to reform medical regulation and ensure professional accountability. |
published_date |
2011-09-22T03:36:10Z |
_version_ |
1763751567138226176 |
score |
11.036706 |