No Cover Image

Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract 586 views

Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge?

John Martyn Chamberlain, Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

Third International Sociological Association Forum of Sociology

Swansea University Author: Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

Abstract

The regulation of the medical profession in the UK has undergone a period of far-reaching reform over the last four decades, with the traditional model of professional self-regulation arguably being replaced by a more multi-layered risk-based regulatory framework. These events being held by some as...

Full description

Published in: Third International Sociological Association Forum of Sociology
Published: Vienna, Austria International Sociological Association 2016
Online Access: http://www.isa-sociology.org/forum-2016/
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa29731
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2016-09-03T12:54:20Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T05:15:03Z
id cronfa29731
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2016-10-17T10:51:07.6334555</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>29731</id><entry>2016-09-03</entry><title>Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6067-6561</ORCID><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><name>Marty Chamberlain</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-09-03</date><deptcode>CRIM</deptcode><abstract>The regulation of the medical profession in the UK has undergone a period of far-reaching reform over the last four decades, with the traditional model of professional self-regulation arguably being replaced by a more multi-layered risk-based regulatory framework. These events being held by some as being symbolic of well-documented broader reforms in the governmentality of professional forms expertise as we move toward the socio-political conditions associated with high/post modernity within neoliberal democratic nation-states. Against this background, this paper details the findings of research examining two key reforms in the regulation of doctors in the UK: firstly, the introduction of periodic medical revalidation to ensure a doctor remains fit to practice in their chosen speciality, and secondly, reforms to medical tribunal processes when complaints are made about a doctor. In outlining its findings the paper explores if the shift towards risk-adverse governance models adequately captures the dynamic and situational nature of medical encounters between doctors and patients, and so, the everyday conditions through which medical competence and incompetence reveal themselves. The paper concludes by asking whether or not the reforms and findings it outlines are in indeed indicative of a health and social policy reform agenda which has &#x2019;nudged&#x2019; medical regulation toward being more concerned with protecting patients rather than doctors, or if they are simply the latest in a long line of &#x2018;smudges&#x2019; designed to protect entrenched medical interests while promoting the public appearance of a reforming agenda. In doing so, the paper seeks to draw conclusions which it is hoped will be of some relevance to an international audience.</abstract><type>Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract</type><journal>Third International Sociological Association Forum of Sociology</journal><publisher>International Sociological Association</publisher><placeOfPublication>Vienna, Austria</placeOfPublication><keywords>Medicine, medical regulation, nudging</keywords><publishedDay>10</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2016</publishedYear><publishedDate>2016-06-10</publishedDate><doi/><url>http://www.isa-sociology.org/forum-2016/</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Criminology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CRIM</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2016-10-17T10:51:07.6334555</lastEdited><Created>2016-09-03T08:26:34.1477619</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>John Martyn</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6067-6561</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2016-10-17T10:51:07.6334555 v2 29731 2016-09-03 Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge? 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144 0000-0001-6067-6561 Marty Chamberlain Marty Chamberlain true false 2016-09-03 CRIM The regulation of the medical profession in the UK has undergone a period of far-reaching reform over the last four decades, with the traditional model of professional self-regulation arguably being replaced by a more multi-layered risk-based regulatory framework. These events being held by some as being symbolic of well-documented broader reforms in the governmentality of professional forms expertise as we move toward the socio-political conditions associated with high/post modernity within neoliberal democratic nation-states. Against this background, this paper details the findings of research examining two key reforms in the regulation of doctors in the UK: firstly, the introduction of periodic medical revalidation to ensure a doctor remains fit to practice in their chosen speciality, and secondly, reforms to medical tribunal processes when complaints are made about a doctor. In outlining its findings the paper explores if the shift towards risk-adverse governance models adequately captures the dynamic and situational nature of medical encounters between doctors and patients, and so, the everyday conditions through which medical competence and incompetence reveal themselves. The paper concludes by asking whether or not the reforms and findings it outlines are in indeed indicative of a health and social policy reform agenda which has ’nudged’ medical regulation toward being more concerned with protecting patients rather than doctors, or if they are simply the latest in a long line of ‘smudges’ designed to protect entrenched medical interests while promoting the public appearance of a reforming agenda. In doing so, the paper seeks to draw conclusions which it is hoped will be of some relevance to an international audience. Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract Third International Sociological Association Forum of Sociology International Sociological Association Vienna, Austria Medicine, medical regulation, nudging 10 6 2016 2016-06-10 http://www.isa-sociology.org/forum-2016/ COLLEGE NANME Criminology COLLEGE CODE CRIM Swansea University 2016-10-17T10:51:07.6334555 2016-09-03T08:26:34.1477619 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law John Martyn Chamberlain 1 Marty Chamberlain 0000-0001-6067-6561 2
title Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge?
spellingShingle Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge?
Marty Chamberlain
title_short Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge?
title_full Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge?
title_fullStr Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge?
title_full_unstemmed Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge?
title_sort Regulating medicine in the UK: a matter of nudge or smudge?
author_id_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144
author_id_fullname_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144_***_Marty Chamberlain
author Marty Chamberlain
author2 John Martyn Chamberlain
Marty Chamberlain
format Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract
container_title Third International Sociological Association Forum of Sociology
publishDate 2016
institution Swansea University
publisher International Sociological Association
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url http://www.isa-sociology.org/forum-2016/
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description The regulation of the medical profession in the UK has undergone a period of far-reaching reform over the last four decades, with the traditional model of professional self-regulation arguably being replaced by a more multi-layered risk-based regulatory framework. These events being held by some as being symbolic of well-documented broader reforms in the governmentality of professional forms expertise as we move toward the socio-political conditions associated with high/post modernity within neoliberal democratic nation-states. Against this background, this paper details the findings of research examining two key reforms in the regulation of doctors in the UK: firstly, the introduction of periodic medical revalidation to ensure a doctor remains fit to practice in their chosen speciality, and secondly, reforms to medical tribunal processes when complaints are made about a doctor. In outlining its findings the paper explores if the shift towards risk-adverse governance models adequately captures the dynamic and situational nature of medical encounters between doctors and patients, and so, the everyday conditions through which medical competence and incompetence reveal themselves. The paper concludes by asking whether or not the reforms and findings it outlines are in indeed indicative of a health and social policy reform agenda which has ’nudged’ medical regulation toward being more concerned with protecting patients rather than doctors, or if they are simply the latest in a long line of ‘smudges’ designed to protect entrenched medical interests while promoting the public appearance of a reforming agenda. In doing so, the paper seeks to draw conclusions which it is hoped will be of some relevance to an international audience.
published_date 2016-06-10T03:36:12Z
_version_ 1763751569579311104
score 11.012678

Similar Items