Journal article 1318 views
Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice
European Journal of Political Theory, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 363 - 372
Swansea University Author:
Gideon Calder
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1177/1474885115587119
Abstract
The family disrupts equality while also, think many, providing goods of unique value. In Family Values, Brighouse and Swift tackle both of these tendencies, offering a refined and distinctive liberal egalitarian account both of the value of family life, and the limits of what may be done in its name...
Published in: | European Journal of Political Theory |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1474-8851 1741-2730 |
Published: |
2016
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa30122 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2016-09-20T19:02:59Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-02-09T05:15:50Z |
id |
cronfa30122 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2016-12-08T17:01:40.5464626</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>30122</id><entry>2016-09-20</entry><title>Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7a50a4eeeb5c00bad3acd160cf138a8e</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5668-1824</ORCID><firstname>Gideon</firstname><surname>Calder</surname><name>Gideon Calder</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-09-20</date><deptcode>APC</deptcode><abstract>The family disrupts equality while also, think many, providing goods of unique value. In Family Values, Brighouse and Swift tackle both of these tendencies, offering a refined and distinctive liberal egalitarian account both of the value of family life, and the limits of what may be done in its name. It builds up from an account of children's specific interests to a defence of ‘familial relationship goods’ as providing the best way of satisfying those interests. Thus though parenthood carries goods of its own, parental prerogatives are delimited by what is good for children. The position which emerges plays out in nuanced, sometimes surprising ways. I raise three main lines of potential criticism, concerning, respectively, the distribution of family relationship goods, their value in relation to fair equality of opportunity, and the viability of distinguishing between family-located and other contributions to the realisation of a child's interests.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>European Journal of Political Theory</journal><volume>15</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>363</paginationStart><paginationEnd>372</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>1474-8851</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1741-2730</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2016</publishedYear><publishedDate>2016-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1177/1474885115587119</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>APC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2016-12-08T17:01:40.5464626</lastEdited><Created>2016-09-20T13:07:16.1505790</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Health and Social Care - Public Health</level></path><authors><author><firstname>G.</firstname><surname>Calder</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Gideon</firstname><surname>Calder</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5668-1824</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2016-12-08T17:01:40.5464626 v2 30122 2016-09-20 Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice 7a50a4eeeb5c00bad3acd160cf138a8e 0000-0002-5668-1824 Gideon Calder Gideon Calder true false 2016-09-20 APC The family disrupts equality while also, think many, providing goods of unique value. In Family Values, Brighouse and Swift tackle both of these tendencies, offering a refined and distinctive liberal egalitarian account both of the value of family life, and the limits of what may be done in its name. It builds up from an account of children's specific interests to a defence of ‘familial relationship goods’ as providing the best way of satisfying those interests. Thus though parenthood carries goods of its own, parental prerogatives are delimited by what is good for children. The position which emerges plays out in nuanced, sometimes surprising ways. I raise three main lines of potential criticism, concerning, respectively, the distribution of family relationship goods, their value in relation to fair equality of opportunity, and the viability of distinguishing between family-located and other contributions to the realisation of a child's interests. Journal Article European Journal of Political Theory 15 3 363 372 1474-8851 1741-2730 31 12 2016 2016-12-31 10.1177/1474885115587119 COLLEGE NANME Politics, Philosophy and International Relations COLLEGE CODE APC Swansea University 2016-12-08T17:01:40.5464626 2016-09-20T13:07:16.1505790 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Health and Social Care - Public Health G. Calder 1 Gideon Calder 0000-0002-5668-1824 2 |
title |
Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice |
spellingShingle |
Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice Gideon Calder |
title_short |
Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice |
title_full |
Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice |
title_fullStr |
Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice |
title_sort |
Brighouse and Swift on the family, ethics and social justice |
author_id_str_mv |
7a50a4eeeb5c00bad3acd160cf138a8e |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
7a50a4eeeb5c00bad3acd160cf138a8e_***_Gideon Calder |
author |
Gideon Calder |
author2 |
G. Calder Gideon Calder |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
European Journal of Political Theory |
container_volume |
15 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
363 |
publishDate |
2016 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1474-8851 1741-2730 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1177/1474885115587119 |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
School of Health and Social Care - Public Health{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Health and Social Care - Public Health |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
The family disrupts equality while also, think many, providing goods of unique value. In Family Values, Brighouse and Swift tackle both of these tendencies, offering a refined and distinctive liberal egalitarian account both of the value of family life, and the limits of what may be done in its name. It builds up from an account of children's specific interests to a defence of ‘familial relationship goods’ as providing the best way of satisfying those interests. Thus though parenthood carries goods of its own, parental prerogatives are delimited by what is good for children. The position which emerges plays out in nuanced, sometimes surprising ways. I raise three main lines of potential criticism, concerning, respectively, the distribution of family relationship goods, their value in relation to fair equality of opportunity, and the viability of distinguishing between family-located and other contributions to the realisation of a child's interests. |
published_date |
2016-12-31T03:36:46Z |
_version_ |
1763751605064171520 |
score |
11.021648 |