No Cover Image

Book 1338 views

Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance

Themis Chronopoulos Orcid Logo

Swansea University Author: Themis Chronopoulos Orcid Logo

Abstract

This book demonstrates how spatial regulation became one of the most important ways to reverse the decline of New York City in the post–World War II period. As New York began to lose its status as a leading global city, the perception of urban disorder, whether that disorder was physical (e.g., slum...

Full description

ISBN: 9780415891585 9780203819081
Published: Routledge 2011
Online Access: http://themis.slass.org/spatial-regulation-in-new-york-city.html
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa30511
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2016-10-10T19:42:03Z
last_indexed 2021-02-26T03:47:38Z
id cronfa30511
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-02-25T11:34:58.0208493</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>30511</id><entry>2016-10-08</entry><title>Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>72a13448038d4f74247005cdacb95f1d</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-2690-8634</ORCID><firstname>Themis</firstname><surname>Chronopoulos</surname><name>Themis Chronopoulos</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-10-08</date><deptcode>AHIS</deptcode><abstract>This book demonstrates how spatial regulation became one of the most important ways to reverse the decline of New York City in the post&#x2013;World War II period. As New York began to lose its status as a leading global city, the perception of urban disorder, whether that disorder was physical (e.g., slums, shabby streets, crumbling infrastructure) or social (e.g., homeless people, hustlers, rowdy teenagers), represented a threat to the middle class and investors and thus to the financial and political viability of the city government. Consequently, mayors and other elected and nonelected leaders mounted initiatives such as urban renewal, exclusionary zoning, antivagrancy laws, and order-maintenance policing to control, if not erase, disorder. These initiatives were part of a class project that deflected attention from the underlying causes of poverty, eroded civil rights, and sought to enable real estate investment, high-end consumption, mainstream tourism, and corporate success. The various strategies of spatial ordering that were employed corresponded to shifts in political ideology. Liberals who dominated New York City politics between the 1940s and the early 1970s emphasized physical solutions against disorder such as urban renewal and the elimination of slums. However, as urban renewal became discredited and crime increased dramatically, neoconservatives denounced postwar liberalism as the source of the city&#x2019;s decline. After the fiscal crisis of 1975, brands of neoliberalism and neoconservatism merged and articulated a new vision of spatial regulation based on aggressive policing. Instead of redeveloping low-income African American and Latino neighborhoods, the authorities targeted people who committed minor infractions in public space. By the 1990s, these efforts to regulate urban space were promoted under the banners of &#x201C;broken windows&#x201D; and &#x201C;zero-tolerance policing.&#x201D;</abstract><type>Book</type><journal/><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Routledge</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint>9780415891585</isbnPrint><isbnElectronic>9780203819081</isbnElectronic><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2011</publishedYear><publishedDate>2011-12-31</publishedDate><doi/><url>http://themis.slass.org/spatial-regulation-in-new-york-city.html</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>History</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>AHIS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-02-25T11:34:58.0208493</lastEdited><Created>2016-10-08T14:16:33.8960426</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Themis</firstname><surname>Chronopoulos</surname><orcid>0000-0003-2690-8634</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2021-02-25T11:34:58.0208493 v2 30511 2016-10-08 Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance 72a13448038d4f74247005cdacb95f1d 0000-0003-2690-8634 Themis Chronopoulos Themis Chronopoulos true false 2016-10-08 AHIS This book demonstrates how spatial regulation became one of the most important ways to reverse the decline of New York City in the post–World War II period. As New York began to lose its status as a leading global city, the perception of urban disorder, whether that disorder was physical (e.g., slums, shabby streets, crumbling infrastructure) or social (e.g., homeless people, hustlers, rowdy teenagers), represented a threat to the middle class and investors and thus to the financial and political viability of the city government. Consequently, mayors and other elected and nonelected leaders mounted initiatives such as urban renewal, exclusionary zoning, antivagrancy laws, and order-maintenance policing to control, if not erase, disorder. These initiatives were part of a class project that deflected attention from the underlying causes of poverty, eroded civil rights, and sought to enable real estate investment, high-end consumption, mainstream tourism, and corporate success. The various strategies of spatial ordering that were employed corresponded to shifts in political ideology. Liberals who dominated New York City politics between the 1940s and the early 1970s emphasized physical solutions against disorder such as urban renewal and the elimination of slums. However, as urban renewal became discredited and crime increased dramatically, neoconservatives denounced postwar liberalism as the source of the city’s decline. After the fiscal crisis of 1975, brands of neoliberalism and neoconservatism merged and articulated a new vision of spatial regulation based on aggressive policing. Instead of redeveloping low-income African American and Latino neighborhoods, the authorities targeted people who committed minor infractions in public space. By the 1990s, these efforts to regulate urban space were promoted under the banners of “broken windows” and “zero-tolerance policing.” Book Routledge 9780415891585 9780203819081 31 12 2011 2011-12-31 http://themis.slass.org/spatial-regulation-in-new-york-city.html COLLEGE NANME History COLLEGE CODE AHIS Swansea University 2021-02-25T11:34:58.0208493 2016-10-08T14:16:33.8960426 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Themis Chronopoulos 0000-0003-2690-8634 1
title Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance
spellingShingle Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance
Themis Chronopoulos
title_short Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance
title_full Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance
title_fullStr Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance
title_sort Spatial Regulation in New York City: From Urban Renewal to Zero Tolerance
author_id_str_mv 72a13448038d4f74247005cdacb95f1d
author_id_fullname_str_mv 72a13448038d4f74247005cdacb95f1d_***_Themis Chronopoulos
author Themis Chronopoulos
author2 Themis Chronopoulos
format Book
publishDate 2011
institution Swansea University
isbn 9780415891585
9780203819081
publisher Routledge
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations
url http://themis.slass.org/spatial-regulation-in-new-york-city.html
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description This book demonstrates how spatial regulation became one of the most important ways to reverse the decline of New York City in the post–World War II period. As New York began to lose its status as a leading global city, the perception of urban disorder, whether that disorder was physical (e.g., slums, shabby streets, crumbling infrastructure) or social (e.g., homeless people, hustlers, rowdy teenagers), represented a threat to the middle class and investors and thus to the financial and political viability of the city government. Consequently, mayors and other elected and nonelected leaders mounted initiatives such as urban renewal, exclusionary zoning, antivagrancy laws, and order-maintenance policing to control, if not erase, disorder. These initiatives were part of a class project that deflected attention from the underlying causes of poverty, eroded civil rights, and sought to enable real estate investment, high-end consumption, mainstream tourism, and corporate success. The various strategies of spatial ordering that were employed corresponded to shifts in political ideology. Liberals who dominated New York City politics between the 1940s and the early 1970s emphasized physical solutions against disorder such as urban renewal and the elimination of slums. However, as urban renewal became discredited and crime increased dramatically, neoconservatives denounced postwar liberalism as the source of the city’s decline. After the fiscal crisis of 1975, brands of neoliberalism and neoconservatism merged and articulated a new vision of spatial regulation based on aggressive policing. Instead of redeveloping low-income African American and Latino neighborhoods, the authorities targeted people who committed minor infractions in public space. By the 1990s, these efforts to regulate urban space were promoted under the banners of “broken windows” and “zero-tolerance policing.”
published_date 2011-12-31T03:37:06Z
_version_ 1763751626217095168
score 11.016235

Similar Items