No Cover Image

Journal article 1245 views 314 downloads

Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession

Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

The British Journal of Criminology, Volume: 58, Issue: 2, Pages: 394 - 413

Swansea University Author: Marty Chamberlain Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1093/bjc/azx016

Abstract

The General Medical Council decides if, when they are convicted of a crime, a doctor in the United Kingdom should be allowed to continue in their employment. This article is the first to detail these decisions for the period 2005 to 2015. No doctor was barred from practising medicine for serious vio...

Full description

Published in: The British Journal of Criminology
ISSN: 0007-0955 1464-3529
Published: 2018
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa32008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2017-02-17T19:53:37Z
last_indexed 2020-07-08T18:48:59Z
id cronfa32008
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-07-08T13:18:16.5502252</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>32008</id><entry>2017-02-17</entry><title>Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6067-6561</ORCID><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><name>Marty Chamberlain</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-02-17</date><deptcode>CRIM</deptcode><abstract>The General Medical Council decides if, when they are convicted of a crime, a doctor in the United Kingdom should be allowed to continue in their employment. This article is the first to detail these decisions for the period 2005 to 2015. No doctor was barred from practising medicine for serious violent and sex offences; including, rape, possession of images of child sexual abuse, manslaughter and domestic violence. These findings are placed in the context of contemporary developments in criminal record reform and criminological analysis of the relationship between employment and desistance. It is concluded that the high degree of devolved discretion allowed to elite professional occupations must be subjected to further critical scrutiny and policy reform.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>The British Journal of Criminology</journal><volume>58</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>394</paginationStart><paginationEnd>413</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>0007-0955</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1464-3529</issnElectronic><keywords>Criminal record, desistance, employment, ex-offenders, medical profession, re-entry</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2018</publishedYear><publishedDate>2018-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1093/bjc/azx016</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Criminology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CRIM</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-07-08T13:18:16.5502252</lastEdited><Created>2017-02-17T13:26:52.5340459</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Marty</firstname><surname>Chamberlain</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6067-6561</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0032008-23032017121100.pdf</filename><originalFilename>DoctoringwithconvictionAM.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-03-23T12:11:00.2130000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>609075</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2019-03-23T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2020-07-08T13:18:16.5502252 v2 32008 2017-02-17 Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144 0000-0001-6067-6561 Marty Chamberlain Marty Chamberlain true false 2017-02-17 CRIM The General Medical Council decides if, when they are convicted of a crime, a doctor in the United Kingdom should be allowed to continue in their employment. This article is the first to detail these decisions for the period 2005 to 2015. No doctor was barred from practising medicine for serious violent and sex offences; including, rape, possession of images of child sexual abuse, manslaughter and domestic violence. These findings are placed in the context of contemporary developments in criminal record reform and criminological analysis of the relationship between employment and desistance. It is concluded that the high degree of devolved discretion allowed to elite professional occupations must be subjected to further critical scrutiny and policy reform. Journal Article The British Journal of Criminology 58 2 394 413 0007-0955 1464-3529 Criminal record, desistance, employment, ex-offenders, medical profession, re-entry 31 12 2018 2018-12-31 10.1093/bjc/azx016 COLLEGE NANME Criminology COLLEGE CODE CRIM Swansea University 2020-07-08T13:18:16.5502252 2017-02-17T13:26:52.5340459 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Marty Chamberlain 0000-0001-6067-6561 1 0032008-23032017121100.pdf DoctoringwithconvictionAM.pdf 2017-03-23T12:11:00.2130000 Output 609075 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2019-03-23T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession
spellingShingle Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession
Marty Chamberlain
title_short Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession
title_full Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession
title_fullStr Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession
title_full_unstemmed Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession
title_sort Doctoring With Conviction: Criminal Records and the Medical Profession
author_id_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144
author_id_fullname_str_mv 98bbc13e72a7ce4126a562a668e50144_***_Marty Chamberlain
author Marty Chamberlain
author2 Marty Chamberlain
format Journal article
container_title The British Journal of Criminology
container_volume 58
container_issue 2
container_start_page 394
publishDate 2018
institution Swansea University
issn 0007-0955
1464-3529
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bjc/azx016
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description The General Medical Council decides if, when they are convicted of a crime, a doctor in the United Kingdom should be allowed to continue in their employment. This article is the first to detail these decisions for the period 2005 to 2015. No doctor was barred from practising medicine for serious violent and sex offences; including, rape, possession of images of child sexual abuse, manslaughter and domestic violence. These findings are placed in the context of contemporary developments in criminal record reform and criminological analysis of the relationship between employment and desistance. It is concluded that the high degree of devolved discretion allowed to elite professional occupations must be subjected to further critical scrutiny and policy reform.
published_date 2018-12-31T03:39:09Z
_version_ 1763751754894147584
score 11.036706

Similar Items