Journal article 1388 views 262 downloads
Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices
Journal of Futures Markets, Volume: 38, Issue: 1, Pages: 83 - 103
Swansea University Author: Rui Fan
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Download (1.11MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1002/fut.21859
Abstract
This paper presents the first comparison of the accuracy of density forecasts for stock prices. Six sets of forecasts are evaluated for DJIA stocks, across four forecast horizons. Two forecasts are risk-neutral densities implied by the Black-Scholes and Heston models. The third set are historical lo...
Published in: | Journal of Futures Markets |
---|---|
ISSN: | 02707314 |
Published: |
Wiley
2017
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa33240 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2017-05-05T13:04:04Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-10-27T03:56:51Z |
id |
cronfa33240 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-10-26T19:09:16.9408911</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>33240</id><entry>2017-05-05</entry><title>Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>4259d5c5f4095e7abae064ef8775c92b</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-8147-5758</ORCID><firstname>Rui</firstname><surname>Fan</surname><name>Rui Fan</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-05-05</date><deptcode>BAF</deptcode><abstract>This paper presents the first comparison of the accuracy of density forecasts for stock prices. Six sets of forecasts are evaluated for DJIA stocks, across four forecast horizons. Two forecasts are risk-neutral densities implied by the Black-Scholes and Heston models. The third set are historical lognormal densities with dispersion determined by forecasts of realized variances obtained from 5-minute returns. Three further sets are defined by transforming risk-neutral and historical densities into real-world densities. The most accurate method applies the risk transformation to the Black-Scholes densities. This method outperforms all others for 87% of the comparisons made using the likelihood criterion.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Futures Markets</journal><volume>38</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>83</paginationStart><paginationEnd>103</paginationEnd><publisher>Wiley</publisher><issnPrint>02707314</issnPrint><keywords/><publishedDay>8</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-12-08</publishedDate><doi>10.1002/fut.21859</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Accounting and Finance</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BAF</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2018-10-26T19:09:16.9408911</lastEdited><Created>2017-05-05T12:30:39.6068308</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Accounting and Finance</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Rui</firstname><surname>Fan</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8147-5758</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Stephen J.</firstname><surname>Taylor</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Matteo</firstname><surname>Sandri</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0033240-05052017123151.pdf</filename><originalFilename>density2017.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-05-05T12:31:51.6330000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1296777</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2019-06-05T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2018-10-26T19:09:16.9408911 v2 33240 2017-05-05 Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices 4259d5c5f4095e7abae064ef8775c92b 0000-0002-8147-5758 Rui Fan Rui Fan true false 2017-05-05 BAF This paper presents the first comparison of the accuracy of density forecasts for stock prices. Six sets of forecasts are evaluated for DJIA stocks, across four forecast horizons. Two forecasts are risk-neutral densities implied by the Black-Scholes and Heston models. The third set are historical lognormal densities with dispersion determined by forecasts of realized variances obtained from 5-minute returns. Three further sets are defined by transforming risk-neutral and historical densities into real-world densities. The most accurate method applies the risk transformation to the Black-Scholes densities. This method outperforms all others for 87% of the comparisons made using the likelihood criterion. Journal Article Journal of Futures Markets 38 1 83 103 Wiley 02707314 8 12 2017 2017-12-08 10.1002/fut.21859 COLLEGE NANME Accounting and Finance COLLEGE CODE BAF Swansea University 2018-10-26T19:09:16.9408911 2017-05-05T12:30:39.6068308 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Accounting and Finance Rui Fan 0000-0002-8147-5758 1 Stephen J. Taylor 2 Matteo Sandri 3 0033240-05052017123151.pdf density2017.pdf 2017-05-05T12:31:51.6330000 Output 1296777 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2019-06-05T00:00:00.0000000 true eng |
title |
Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices |
spellingShingle |
Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices Rui Fan |
title_short |
Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices |
title_full |
Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices |
title_fullStr |
Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices |
title_sort |
Density forecast comparisons for stock prices, obtained from high-frequency returns and daily option prices |
author_id_str_mv |
4259d5c5f4095e7abae064ef8775c92b |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
4259d5c5f4095e7abae064ef8775c92b_***_Rui Fan |
author |
Rui Fan |
author2 |
Rui Fan Stephen J. Taylor Matteo Sandri |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Journal of Futures Markets |
container_volume |
38 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
83 |
publishDate |
2017 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
02707314 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1002/fut.21859 |
publisher |
Wiley |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Management - Accounting and Finance{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Accounting and Finance |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This paper presents the first comparison of the accuracy of density forecasts for stock prices. Six sets of forecasts are evaluated for DJIA stocks, across four forecast horizons. Two forecasts are risk-neutral densities implied by the Black-Scholes and Heston models. The third set are historical lognormal densities with dispersion determined by forecasts of realized variances obtained from 5-minute returns. Three further sets are defined by transforming risk-neutral and historical densities into real-world densities. The most accurate method applies the risk transformation to the Black-Scholes densities. This method outperforms all others for 87% of the comparisons made using the likelihood criterion. |
published_date |
2017-12-08T03:40:54Z |
_version_ |
1763751865104728064 |
score |
11.035655 |