No Cover Image

Journal article 169 views

Ethics, Brain Injuries, and Sports: Prohibition, Reform, and Prudence / Francisco Javier Lopez Frias; Mike McNamee

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, Volume: 11, Issue: 3, Pages: 264 - 280

Swansea University Author: McNamee, Michael

  • Accepted Manuscript under embargo until: 8th January 2019

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the issue of the elimination of sports, or elements of sports, that present a high risk of brain injury. In particular, we critically examine two elements of Angelo Corlett’s and Pam Sailors’ arguments for the prohibition of football and Nicholas Dixon’s claim for the refor...

Full description

Published in: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
ISSN: 1751-1321 1751-133X
Published: 2017
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa34549
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: In this paper, we explore the issue of the elimination of sports, or elements of sports, that present a high risk of brain injury. In particular, we critically examine two elements of Angelo Corlett’s and Pam Sailors’ arguments for the prohibition of football and Nicholas Dixon’s claim for the reformation of boxing to eliminate blows to the head based on (a) the empirical assumption of an essential or causal connection between brain injuries incurred in football and the development of a degenerative brain disease known as chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE); and (b) John Stuart Mill’s rejection of consensual domination (ie voluntary enslavement). We present four arguments to contest the validity of Corlett, Dixon’s and Sailor’s positions. Specifically, we argue that (i) certain autonomy-based arguments undermine paternalist arguments for reform; (ii) the nature of the goods people pursue in their lives might justify their foregoing (degrees of) future autonomy; (iii) Mill’s argument against consensual domination draws on ambiguous and arbitrary distinctions; (iv) the lack of consensus and empirical evidence regarding CTE arising from brain injuries in sport underdetermines calls for reform. We conclude that these proposals for reforming or eliminating sports with high risks of brain injuries are not well founded.
Keywords: Brain injuries, autonomy, paternalism, football, consensual domination
College: College of Engineering
Issue: 3
Start Page: 264
End Page: 280