Journal article 1325 views 176 downloads
Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy
Energy Procedia, Volume: 125, Pages: 260 - 267
Swansea University Authors: Michael Togneri , Ian Masters
-
PDF | Version of Record
Download (1.25MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.170
Abstract
Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) are commonly used to assess mean currents and turbulence at energetic sites. Since 2014, five-beam ADCP configurations have become more common, but conventional analysis of turbulence properties is still based on the four-beam Janus configuration. We use me...
Published in: | Energy Procedia |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1876-6102 |
Published: |
2017
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa35287 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2017-09-15T13:02:09Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2020-06-01T18:47:16Z |
id |
cronfa35287 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-06-01T16:59:01.9124476</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>35287</id><entry>2017-09-15</entry><title>Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7032d5a521c181cea18dbb759e1ffdeb</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-6820-1680</ORCID><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>Togneri</surname><name>Michael Togneri</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>6fa19551092853928cde0e6d5fac48a1</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-7667-6670</ORCID><firstname>Ian</firstname><surname>Masters</surname><name>Ian Masters</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-09-15</date><deptcode>MECH</deptcode><abstract>Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) are commonly used to assess mean currents and turbulence at energetic sites. Since 2014, five-beam ADCP configurations have become more common, but conventional analysis of turbulence properties is still based on the four-beam Janus configuration. We use measurements from a single site to investigate improved estimates of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) that are made possible by the addition of a fifth vertical beam. We conclude that four-beam estimates of TKE are suitable in most cases, and exhibit lower variance than five-beam estimates, but are more prone to contamination by wave activity.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Energy Procedia</journal><volume>125</volume><paginationStart>260</paginationStart><paginationEnd>267</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>1876-6102</issnPrint><keywords>ADCP; Turbulence; Tidal energy; Ocean current</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.170</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Mechanical Engineering</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MECH</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-06-01T16:59:01.9124476</lastEdited><Created>2017-09-15T10:04:53.5021370</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>Togneri</surname><orcid>0000-0002-6820-1680</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Dale</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Simon</firstname><surname>Neill</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Matt</firstname><surname>Lewis</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Sophie</firstname><surname>Ward</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Marco</firstname><surname>Piano</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Ian</firstname><surname>Masters</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7667-6670</orcid><order>7</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0035287-15092017100740.pdf</filename><originalFilename>togneri2017(3).pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-09-15T10:07:40.0670000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1300140</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2017-09-15T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2020-06-01T16:59:01.9124476 v2 35287 2017-09-15 Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy 7032d5a521c181cea18dbb759e1ffdeb 0000-0002-6820-1680 Michael Togneri Michael Togneri true false 6fa19551092853928cde0e6d5fac48a1 0000-0001-7667-6670 Ian Masters Ian Masters true false 2017-09-15 MECH Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) are commonly used to assess mean currents and turbulence at energetic sites. Since 2014, five-beam ADCP configurations have become more common, but conventional analysis of turbulence properties is still based on the four-beam Janus configuration. We use measurements from a single site to investigate improved estimates of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) that are made possible by the addition of a fifth vertical beam. We conclude that four-beam estimates of TKE are suitable in most cases, and exhibit lower variance than five-beam estimates, but are more prone to contamination by wave activity. Journal Article Energy Procedia 125 260 267 1876-6102 ADCP; Turbulence; Tidal energy; Ocean current 31 12 2017 2017-12-31 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.170 COLLEGE NANME Mechanical Engineering COLLEGE CODE MECH Swansea University 2020-06-01T16:59:01.9124476 2017-09-15T10:04:53.5021370 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering Michael Togneri 0000-0002-6820-1680 1 Dale Jones 2 Simon Neill 3 Matt Lewis 4 Sophie Ward 5 Marco Piano 6 Ian Masters 0000-0001-7667-6670 7 0035287-15092017100740.pdf togneri2017(3).pdf 2017-09-15T10:07:40.0670000 Output 1300140 application/pdf Version of Record true 2017-09-15T00:00:00.0000000 false eng |
title |
Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy Michael Togneri Ian Masters |
title_short |
Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy |
title_full |
Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy |
title_sort |
Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy |
author_id_str_mv |
7032d5a521c181cea18dbb759e1ffdeb 6fa19551092853928cde0e6d5fac48a1 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
7032d5a521c181cea18dbb759e1ffdeb_***_Michael Togneri 6fa19551092853928cde0e6d5fac48a1_***_Ian Masters |
author |
Michael Togneri Ian Masters |
author2 |
Michael Togneri Dale Jones Simon Neill Matt Lewis Sophie Ward Marco Piano Ian Masters |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Energy Procedia |
container_volume |
125 |
container_start_page |
260 |
publishDate |
2017 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1876-6102 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.170 |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) are commonly used to assess mean currents and turbulence at energetic sites. Since 2014, five-beam ADCP configurations have become more common, but conventional analysis of turbulence properties is still based on the four-beam Janus configuration. We use measurements from a single site to investigate improved estimates of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) that are made possible by the addition of a fifth vertical beam. We conclude that four-beam estimates of TKE are suitable in most cases, and exhibit lower variance than five-beam estimates, but are more prone to contamination by wave activity. |
published_date |
2017-12-31T03:43:52Z |
_version_ |
1763752052206338048 |
score |
11.03559 |