No Cover Image

Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract 712 views 44 downloads

Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently

Michael Coffey Orcid Logo

Inaugural Mental Health Nurse Academics UK Lecture

Swansea University Author: Michael Coffey Orcid Logo

Abstract

It seems that our field of mental health nursing is constantly going over old ground in our attempts to understand and articulate what we do. It is unlikely however that many of us will have missed how our work has become more concerned about risk. We are appropriately worried about preventing harm...

Full description

Published in: Inaugural Mental Health Nurse Academics UK Lecture
Published: City Hall, Cardiff 23rd International Mental Health Nursing Research Conference 2017
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa35424
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2017-09-19T12:55:44Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T05:26:35Z
id cronfa35424
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2017-10-30T13:10:58.2162111</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>35424</id><entry>2017-09-19</entry><title>Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>12112bd2ce15561464c98607f3a8eb0b</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-0380-4704</ORCID><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>Coffey</surname><name>Michael Coffey</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-09-19</date><deptcode>PHAC</deptcode><abstract>It seems that our field of mental health nursing is constantly going over old ground in our attempts to understand and articulate what we do. It is unlikely however that many of us will have missed how our work has become more concerned about risk. We are appropriately worried about preventing harm and promoting safety but also understandably concerned about blame and where it might lie. In the midst of this new focus on what Rose has called &#x2018;risk thinking&#x2019; we may be guilty of losing sight of the effect our changing discourses are having on the practice and identity of mental health nursing. Our profession has become concerned with what Godin ruefully notes as &#x2018;ticking the boxes on the form&#x2019; both metaphorically and literally. More worrying still is that this very discourse of risk, harm and blame is also having an effect on the people our profession are meant to be helping. Identity, or how we are known to ourselves and to others, is a critical element of everyday impression management. People with enduring mental distress have often come to know themselves as embodying a diagnostic label and have the added burden of various risk labels. Risk and its measurement, we are meant to believe is a new science. However much of what is claimed to occur in risk assessment is little more than fiction; fables for dealing with the terrible uncertainty that both the person and the nurse experience. Standardised measures are largely unreliable and many do not offer the certainty that we so desperately long for. In this lecture I base my analysis on more than 30 years of research and practice as a mental health nurse to explore notions of risk and their effects, highlight the use of discourses on and of risk and how these both limit and alternatively could be used to enhance identity work of individuals and the profession itself. I make the case that new forms of involvement and engagement in discussions about risk are required that more directly align with mental health nursing identities and that will enable people using services to build and sustain agency.</abstract><type>Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract</type><journal>Inaugural Mental Health Nurse Academics UK Lecture</journal><publisher>23rd International Mental Health Nursing Research Conference</publisher><placeOfPublication>City Hall, Cardiff</placeOfPublication><keywords/><publishedDay>15</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-09-15</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Public Health</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>PHAC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2017-10-30T13:10:58.2162111</lastEdited><Created>2017-09-19T09:58:32.3965120</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Health and Social Care - Public Health</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>Coffey</surname><orcid>0000-0002-0380-4704</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0035424-19092017100005.pdf</filename><originalFilename>MHNAUKlecturenotesandslides.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-09-19T10:00:05.3570000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>905774</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Author's Original</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2017-09-19T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2017-10-30T13:10:58.2162111 v2 35424 2017-09-19 Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently 12112bd2ce15561464c98607f3a8eb0b 0000-0002-0380-4704 Michael Coffey Michael Coffey true false 2017-09-19 PHAC It seems that our field of mental health nursing is constantly going over old ground in our attempts to understand and articulate what we do. It is unlikely however that many of us will have missed how our work has become more concerned about risk. We are appropriately worried about preventing harm and promoting safety but also understandably concerned about blame and where it might lie. In the midst of this new focus on what Rose has called ‘risk thinking’ we may be guilty of losing sight of the effect our changing discourses are having on the practice and identity of mental health nursing. Our profession has become concerned with what Godin ruefully notes as ‘ticking the boxes on the form’ both metaphorically and literally. More worrying still is that this very discourse of risk, harm and blame is also having an effect on the people our profession are meant to be helping. Identity, or how we are known to ourselves and to others, is a critical element of everyday impression management. People with enduring mental distress have often come to know themselves as embodying a diagnostic label and have the added burden of various risk labels. Risk and its measurement, we are meant to believe is a new science. However much of what is claimed to occur in risk assessment is little more than fiction; fables for dealing with the terrible uncertainty that both the person and the nurse experience. Standardised measures are largely unreliable and many do not offer the certainty that we so desperately long for. In this lecture I base my analysis on more than 30 years of research and practice as a mental health nurse to explore notions of risk and their effects, highlight the use of discourses on and of risk and how these both limit and alternatively could be used to enhance identity work of individuals and the profession itself. I make the case that new forms of involvement and engagement in discussions about risk are required that more directly align with mental health nursing identities and that will enable people using services to build and sustain agency. Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract Inaugural Mental Health Nurse Academics UK Lecture 23rd International Mental Health Nursing Research Conference City Hall, Cardiff 15 9 2017 2017-09-15 COLLEGE NANME Public Health COLLEGE CODE PHAC Swansea University 2017-10-30T13:10:58.2162111 2017-09-19T09:58:32.3965120 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Health and Social Care - Public Health Michael Coffey 0000-0002-0380-4704 1 0035424-19092017100005.pdf MHNAUKlecturenotesandslides.pdf 2017-09-19T10:00:05.3570000 Output 905774 application/pdf Author's Original true 2017-09-19T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently
spellingShingle Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently
Michael Coffey
title_short Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently
title_full Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently
title_fullStr Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently
title_full_unstemmed Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently
title_sort Risk, discourse and identity work: what we do and how we could do it differently
author_id_str_mv 12112bd2ce15561464c98607f3a8eb0b
author_id_fullname_str_mv 12112bd2ce15561464c98607f3a8eb0b_***_Michael Coffey
author Michael Coffey
author2 Michael Coffey
format Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract
container_title Inaugural Mental Health Nurse Academics UK Lecture
publishDate 2017
institution Swansea University
publisher 23rd International Mental Health Nursing Research Conference
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Health and Social Care - Public Health{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Health and Social Care - Public Health
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description It seems that our field of mental health nursing is constantly going over old ground in our attempts to understand and articulate what we do. It is unlikely however that many of us will have missed how our work has become more concerned about risk. We are appropriately worried about preventing harm and promoting safety but also understandably concerned about blame and where it might lie. In the midst of this new focus on what Rose has called ‘risk thinking’ we may be guilty of losing sight of the effect our changing discourses are having on the practice and identity of mental health nursing. Our profession has become concerned with what Godin ruefully notes as ‘ticking the boxes on the form’ both metaphorically and literally. More worrying still is that this very discourse of risk, harm and blame is also having an effect on the people our profession are meant to be helping. Identity, or how we are known to ourselves and to others, is a critical element of everyday impression management. People with enduring mental distress have often come to know themselves as embodying a diagnostic label and have the added burden of various risk labels. Risk and its measurement, we are meant to believe is a new science. However much of what is claimed to occur in risk assessment is little more than fiction; fables for dealing with the terrible uncertainty that both the person and the nurse experience. Standardised measures are largely unreliable and many do not offer the certainty that we so desperately long for. In this lecture I base my analysis on more than 30 years of research and practice as a mental health nurse to explore notions of risk and their effects, highlight the use of discourses on and of risk and how these both limit and alternatively could be used to enhance identity work of individuals and the profession itself. I make the case that new forms of involvement and engagement in discussions about risk are required that more directly align with mental health nursing identities and that will enable people using services to build and sustain agency.
published_date 2017-09-15T03:43:30Z
_version_ 1756779837378265088
score 10.927107