No Cover Image

Journal article 1011 views 276 downloads

Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study

Jason Davies Orcid Logo, Aisling O'Meara

Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 227 - 238

Swansea University Author: Jason Davies Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1002/cbm.2063

Abstract

Background: In England and Wales, ‘approved premises’ (AP) offer 24 hour staffed accommodation for high risk offenders most of whom are returning to the community from prison. With a move towards a standardised operating model, it is essential to be able to measure outcomes. Aims: To collate and eva...

Full description

Published in: Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health
ISSN: 09579664
Published: 2018
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa36706
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2017-11-09T19:57:26Z
last_indexed 2019-05-13T13:17:49Z
id cronfa36706
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-05-13T09:54:46.8481049</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>36706</id><entry>2017-11-09</entry><title>Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>b7dab4136f5c9c0614cda9bf2d5910b0</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-1694-5370</ORCID><firstname>Jason</firstname><surname>Davies</surname><name>Jason Davies</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-11-09</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>Background: In England and Wales, &#x2018;approved premises&#x2019; (AP) offer 24 hour staffed accommodation for high risk offenders most of whom are returning to the community from prison. With a move towards a standardised operating model, it is essential to be able to measure outcomes. Aims: To collate and evaluate &#x2018;benchmarks&#x2019; for approved premises. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive design was used to establish the impact of existing practice in all four approved premises in Wales. Data on well-being, life satisfaction, attitudes to violence and problem solving abilities were recorded with 114 male residents (of 484), and attitudes to personality disorder and personal wellbeing/burnout with 30 staff (of 86), in both narrative style and according to a number of scales used within criminal justice and healthcare systems. Perceptions of environmental climate were assessed with both groups. Scores were compared with those from reference groups, including prisoners and secure hospital patients. Criminological outcomes (e.g. prison recall) were obtained for all 486 men. Results: Scores on the scales used were broadly comparable to those in relevant reference groups, but some measures showed floor or ceiling effects. Recall rates, whether directly from the premises or after further onward movement, were about 42% overall; comparable to those reported for similar offenders elsewhere. Conclusions: This paper provides a short battery of measurements for use as benchmarks of experience and outcomes in staffed community accommodation for high risk men.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health</journal><volume>28</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>227</paginationStart><paginationEnd>238</paginationEnd><publisher></publisher><placeOfPublication></placeOfPublication><isbnPrint></isbnPrint><isbnElectronic></isbnElectronic><issnPrint>09579664</issnPrint><keywords/><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2018</publishedYear><publishedDate>2018-06-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1002/cbm.2063</doi><url></url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-05-13T09:54:46.8481049</lastEdited><Created>2017-11-09T18:29:11.3917018</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Jason</firstname><surname>Davies</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1694-5370</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Aisling</firstname><surname>O'Meara</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0036706-09112017183000.pdf</filename><originalFilename>DaviesOMearaBenchmarkingOctober2017.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-11-09T18:30:00.8600000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>302717</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2018-11-29T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-05-13T09:54:46.8481049 v2 36706 2017-11-09 Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study b7dab4136f5c9c0614cda9bf2d5910b0 0000-0002-1694-5370 Jason Davies Jason Davies true false 2017-11-09 HPS Background: In England and Wales, ‘approved premises’ (AP) offer 24 hour staffed accommodation for high risk offenders most of whom are returning to the community from prison. With a move towards a standardised operating model, it is essential to be able to measure outcomes. Aims: To collate and evaluate ‘benchmarks’ for approved premises. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive design was used to establish the impact of existing practice in all four approved premises in Wales. Data on well-being, life satisfaction, attitudes to violence and problem solving abilities were recorded with 114 male residents (of 484), and attitudes to personality disorder and personal wellbeing/burnout with 30 staff (of 86), in both narrative style and according to a number of scales used within criminal justice and healthcare systems. Perceptions of environmental climate were assessed with both groups. Scores were compared with those from reference groups, including prisoners and secure hospital patients. Criminological outcomes (e.g. prison recall) were obtained for all 486 men. Results: Scores on the scales used were broadly comparable to those in relevant reference groups, but some measures showed floor or ceiling effects. Recall rates, whether directly from the premises or after further onward movement, were about 42% overall; comparable to those reported for similar offenders elsewhere. Conclusions: This paper provides a short battery of measurements for use as benchmarks of experience and outcomes in staffed community accommodation for high risk men. Journal Article Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 28 3 227 238 09579664 30 6 2018 2018-06-30 10.1002/cbm.2063 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University 2019-05-13T09:54:46.8481049 2017-11-09T18:29:11.3917018 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Jason Davies 0000-0002-1694-5370 1 Aisling O'Meara 2 0036706-09112017183000.pdf DaviesOMearaBenchmarkingOctober2017.pdf 2017-11-09T18:30:00.8600000 Output 302717 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2018-11-29T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study
spellingShingle Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study
Jason Davies
title_short Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study
title_full Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study
title_fullStr Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study
title_full_unstemmed Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study
title_sort Routine practice in staffed community accommodation (approved premises) in England and Wales: Quantitative benchmarking from the first year of a longitudinal study
author_id_str_mv b7dab4136f5c9c0614cda9bf2d5910b0
author_id_fullname_str_mv b7dab4136f5c9c0614cda9bf2d5910b0_***_Jason Davies
author Jason Davies
author2 Jason Davies
Aisling O'Meara
format Journal article
container_title Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health
container_volume 28
container_issue 3
container_start_page 227
publishDate 2018
institution Swansea University
issn 09579664
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cbm.2063
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Background: In England and Wales, ‘approved premises’ (AP) offer 24 hour staffed accommodation for high risk offenders most of whom are returning to the community from prison. With a move towards a standardised operating model, it is essential to be able to measure outcomes. Aims: To collate and evaluate ‘benchmarks’ for approved premises. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive design was used to establish the impact of existing practice in all four approved premises in Wales. Data on well-being, life satisfaction, attitudes to violence and problem solving abilities were recorded with 114 male residents (of 484), and attitudes to personality disorder and personal wellbeing/burnout with 30 staff (of 86), in both narrative style and according to a number of scales used within criminal justice and healthcare systems. Perceptions of environmental climate were assessed with both groups. Scores were compared with those from reference groups, including prisoners and secure hospital patients. Criminological outcomes (e.g. prison recall) were obtained for all 486 men. Results: Scores on the scales used were broadly comparable to those in relevant reference groups, but some measures showed floor or ceiling effects. Recall rates, whether directly from the premises or after further onward movement, were about 42% overall; comparable to those reported for similar offenders elsewhere. Conclusions: This paper provides a short battery of measurements for use as benchmarks of experience and outcomes in staffed community accommodation for high risk men.
published_date 2018-06-30T03:46:00Z
_version_ 1763752186635878400
score 11.021648

Similar Items