No Cover Image

Book chapter 1244 views 243 downloads

The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy

Yvonne McDermott Rees Orcid Logo

The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law: Assessing the ICTY and the ICTR's Most Significant Legal Accomplishments, Pages: 180 - 196

Swansea University Author: Yvonne McDermott Rees Orcid Logo

DOI (Published version): 10.1017/9781108277525.009

Abstract

This chapter draws on the rich and varied jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in enunciating some of the key themes that underpinned their fact-finding practices. It provides suggestions on how the standard...

Full description

Published in: The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law: Assessing the ICTY and the ICTR's Most Significant Legal Accomplishments
ISBN: 9781108277525
Published: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2019
Online Access: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/legacy-of-ad-hoc-tribunals-in-international-criminal-law/tribunals-factfinding-legacy/D5398FB376D88C107FF5C4F3992ABC5C
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa39007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2018-05-21T03:58:13Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T14:14:58Z
id cronfa39007
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-09-28T17:58:26.1173168</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>39007</id><entry>2018-03-12</entry><title>The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>e6e1ae537327fc3f38d2af4a9d9834d8</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0111-9049</ORCID><firstname>Yvonne</firstname><surname>McDermott Rees</surname><name>Yvonne McDermott Rees</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2018-03-12</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>This chapter draws on the rich and varied jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in enunciating some of the key themes that underpinned their fact-finding practices. It provides suggestions on how the standard of proof could be more clearly articulated, how the evaluation of evidence could be made more explicit, and how international criminal judgments could be made more accessible, drawing on the experience of both tribunals. The increased accessibility and clarity that would result would in turn enhance the legal and sociological legitimacy of future international criminal trials.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law: Assessing the ICTY and the ICTR's Most Significant Legal Accomplishments</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart>180</paginationStart><paginationEnd>196</paginationEnd><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><placeOfPublication>Cambridge</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic>9781108277525</isbnElectronic><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>fact-finding; proof; evidence; international criminal law</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2019</publishedYear><publishedDate>2019-03-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1017/9781108277525.009</doi><url>https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/legacy-of-ad-hoc-tribunals-in-international-criminal-law/tribunals-factfinding-legacy/D5398FB376D88C107FF5C4F3992ABC5C</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-09-28T17:58:26.1173168</lastEdited><Created>2018-03-12T08:30:43.6515515</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Yvonne</firstname><surname>McDermott Rees</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0111-9049</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0039007-08042019102953.pdf</filename><originalFilename>TribunalsFact-FindingLegacychapterfinal.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-04-08T10:29:53.7700000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>772299</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2019-09-01T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-09-28T17:58:26.1173168 v2 39007 2018-03-12 The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy e6e1ae537327fc3f38d2af4a9d9834d8 0000-0003-0111-9049 Yvonne McDermott Rees Yvonne McDermott Rees true false 2018-03-12 LAWD This chapter draws on the rich and varied jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in enunciating some of the key themes that underpinned their fact-finding practices. It provides suggestions on how the standard of proof could be more clearly articulated, how the evaluation of evidence could be made more explicit, and how international criminal judgments could be made more accessible, drawing on the experience of both tribunals. The increased accessibility and clarity that would result would in turn enhance the legal and sociological legitimacy of future international criminal trials. Book chapter The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law: Assessing the ICTY and the ICTR's Most Significant Legal Accomplishments 180 196 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 9781108277525 fact-finding; proof; evidence; international criminal law 31 3 2019 2019-03-31 10.1017/9781108277525.009 https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/legacy-of-ad-hoc-tribunals-in-international-criminal-law/tribunals-factfinding-legacy/D5398FB376D88C107FF5C4F3992ABC5C COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2022-09-28T17:58:26.1173168 2018-03-12T08:30:43.6515515 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Yvonne McDermott Rees 0000-0003-0111-9049 1 0039007-08042019102953.pdf TribunalsFact-FindingLegacychapterfinal.pdf 2019-04-08T10:29:53.7700000 Output 772299 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2019-09-01T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy
spellingShingle The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy
Yvonne McDermott Rees
title_short The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy
title_full The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy
title_fullStr The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy
title_full_unstemmed The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy
title_sort The Tribunals' Fact-Finding Legacy
author_id_str_mv e6e1ae537327fc3f38d2af4a9d9834d8
author_id_fullname_str_mv e6e1ae537327fc3f38d2af4a9d9834d8_***_Yvonne McDermott Rees
author Yvonne McDermott Rees
author2 Yvonne McDermott Rees
format Book chapter
container_title The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law: Assessing the ICTY and the ICTR's Most Significant Legal Accomplishments
container_start_page 180
publishDate 2019
institution Swansea University
isbn 9781108277525
doi_str_mv 10.1017/9781108277525.009
publisher Cambridge University Press
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/legacy-of-ad-hoc-tribunals-in-international-criminal-law/tribunals-factfinding-legacy/D5398FB376D88C107FF5C4F3992ABC5C
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description This chapter draws on the rich and varied jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in enunciating some of the key themes that underpinned their fact-finding practices. It provides suggestions on how the standard of proof could be more clearly articulated, how the evaluation of evidence could be made more explicit, and how international criminal judgments could be made more accessible, drawing on the experience of both tribunals. The increased accessibility and clarity that would result would in turn enhance the legal and sociological legitimacy of future international criminal trials.
published_date 2019-03-31T03:49:30Z
_version_ 1763752405964423168
score 11.036706

Similar Items