No Cover Image

Conference contribution 253 views 1 download

Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users / Stuart Macdonald; Daniel Grinnell; Nuria Lorenzo-Dus; David Mair

Swansea University Author: Macdonald, Stuart

Abstract

In this study we examine the release on Twitter of a total of nine issues of Rumiyah, the online magazine of the so-called Islamic State. The study addresses two sets of research questions, both of which seek to build upon our earlier pilot study of the release on Twitter of issue 15 of Dabiq (the f...

Full description

Published: Europol Headquarters, The Hague 2nd European Counter Terrorism Centre Advisory Group Conference 2018
Online Access: https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/who-disseminates-rumiyah-examining-relative-influence-of-sympathiser-and-non-sympathiser-twitter-users
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa41091
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2018-07-23T19:39:32Z
last_indexed 2019-06-05T10:48:43Z
id cronfa41091
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-05-30T13:32:53Z</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>41091</id><entry>2018-07-23</entry><title>Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users</title><alternativeTitle></alternativeTitle><author>Stuart Macdonald</author><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><active>true</active><ORCID>0000-0002-7483-9023</ORCID><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent><sid>933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98</sid><email>73adc6f37a779687c19be764ac7fbd45</email><emailaddr>l7WWMBTMlQGiRAtwCFF36hXCE6Z9OGBXOD9D5JU4+T4=</emailaddr><date>2018-07-23</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>In this study we examine the release on Twitter of a total of nine issues of Rumiyah, the online magazine of the so-called Islamic State. The study addresses two sets of research questions, both of which seek to build upon our earlier pilot study of the release on Twitter of issue 15 of Dabiq (the forerunner to Rumiyah). First, our pilot study suggested that pro-IS throwaway accounts were only creating a small splash on Twitter. Has this been the case for Rumiyah? Are these pro-IS accounts being disrupted effectively, before they manage to exert much influence? Second, what is the relative influence of the pro-IS throwaway accounts in comparison to other accounts that are not sympathetic to IS, but nonetheless disseminate its propaganda &#x2013; whether that be for research purposes, personal interest or even to provide an oppositional voice or engage in debate? In other words, how great is the ripple effect generated by these non-IS sympathiser accounts?</abstract><type>Conference contribution</type><journal></journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>2nd European Counter Terrorism Centre Advisory Group Conference</publisher><placeOfPublication>Europol Headquarters, The Hague</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>Jihadism, terrorism, propaganda, social media, Twitter</keywords><publishedDay>16</publishedDay><publishedMonth>7</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2018</publishedYear><publishedDate>2018-07-16</publishedDate><doi></doi><url>https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/who-disseminates-rumiyah-examining-relative-influence-of-sympathiser-and-non-sympathiser-twitter-users</url><notes></notes><college>Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law</college><department>Legal Studies</department><CollegeCode>CLAW</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution/><researchGroup>Criminal Justice and Criminology</researchGroup><supervisor/><sponsorsfunders/><grantnumber/><degreelevel/><degreename>None</degreename><lastEdited>2019-05-30T13:32:53Z</lastEdited><Created>2018-07-23T14:48:20Z</Created><path><level id="1">Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level><level id="2">Legal Studies</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><orcid/><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Daniel</firstname><surname>Grinnell</surname><orcid/><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Nuria</firstname><surname>Lorenzo-Dus</surname><orcid>http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-7939</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Mair</surname><orcid/><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0041091-23072018144931.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Europol2018.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2018-07-23T14:49:31Z</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>563516</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>VoR</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><action>Published to Cronfa</action><actionDate>30/05/2019</actionDate><embargoDate>2018-07-23T00:00:00</embargoDate><documentNotes/><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-05-30T13:32:53Z v2 41091 2018-07-23 Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users Stuart Macdonald Stuart Macdonald true 0000-0002-7483-9023 false 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98 73adc6f37a779687c19be764ac7fbd45 l7WWMBTMlQGiRAtwCFF36hXCE6Z9OGBXOD9D5JU4+T4= 2018-07-23 LAWD In this study we examine the release on Twitter of a total of nine issues of Rumiyah, the online magazine of the so-called Islamic State. The study addresses two sets of research questions, both of which seek to build upon our earlier pilot study of the release on Twitter of issue 15 of Dabiq (the forerunner to Rumiyah). First, our pilot study suggested that pro-IS throwaway accounts were only creating a small splash on Twitter. Has this been the case for Rumiyah? Are these pro-IS accounts being disrupted effectively, before they manage to exert much influence? Second, what is the relative influence of the pro-IS throwaway accounts in comparison to other accounts that are not sympathetic to IS, but nonetheless disseminate its propaganda – whether that be for research purposes, personal interest or even to provide an oppositional voice or engage in debate? In other words, how great is the ripple effect generated by these non-IS sympathiser accounts? Conference contribution 2nd European Counter Terrorism Centre Advisory Group Conference Europol Headquarters, The Hague Jihadism, terrorism, propaganda, social media, Twitter 16 7 2018 2018-07-16 https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/who-disseminates-rumiyah-examining-relative-influence-of-sympathiser-and-non-sympathiser-twitter-users Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law Legal Studies CLAW LAWD Criminal Justice and Criminology None 2019-05-30T13:32:53Z 2018-07-23T14:48:20Z Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law Legal Studies Stuart Macdonald 1 Daniel Grinnell 2 Nuria Lorenzo-Dus http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-7939 3 David Mair 4 0041091-23072018144931.pdf Europol2018.pdf 2018-07-23T14:49:31Z Output 563516 application/pdf VoR true Published to Cronfa 30/05/2019 2018-07-23T00:00:00 true eng
title Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
spellingShingle Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
Macdonald, Stuart
title_short Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
title_full Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
title_fullStr Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
title_full_unstemmed Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
title_sort Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
author_id_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98
author_id_fullname_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98_***_Macdonald, Stuart
author Macdonald, Stuart
author2 Stuart Macdonald
Daniel Grinnell
Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
David Mair
format Conference contribution
publishDate 2018
institution Swansea University
publisher 2nd European Counter Terrorism Centre Advisory Group Conference
college_str Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id hillaryrodhamclintonschooloflaw
hierarchy_top_title Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law
hierarchy_parent_id hillaryrodhamclintonschooloflaw
hierarchy_parent_title Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law
department_str Legal Studies{{{_:::_}}}Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Legal Studies
url https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/who-disseminates-rumiyah-examining-relative-influence-of-sympathiser-and-non-sympathiser-twitter-users
document_store_str 1
active_str 1
researchgroup_str Criminal Justice and Criminology
description In this study we examine the release on Twitter of a total of nine issues of Rumiyah, the online magazine of the so-called Islamic State. The study addresses two sets of research questions, both of which seek to build upon our earlier pilot study of the release on Twitter of issue 15 of Dabiq (the forerunner to Rumiyah). First, our pilot study suggested that pro-IS throwaway accounts were only creating a small splash on Twitter. Has this been the case for Rumiyah? Are these pro-IS accounts being disrupted effectively, before they manage to exert much influence? Second, what is the relative influence of the pro-IS throwaway accounts in comparison to other accounts that are not sympathetic to IS, but nonetheless disseminate its propaganda – whether that be for research purposes, personal interest or even to provide an oppositional voice or engage in debate? In other words, how great is the ripple effect generated by these non-IS sympathiser accounts?
published_date 2018-07-16T15:05:14Z
_version_ 1647830803238879232
score 10.860345