No Cover Image

Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract 1177 views 56 downloads

Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users

Stuart Macdonald Orcid Logo, Daniel Grinnell, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus Orcid Logo, David Mair

Swansea University Author: Stuart Macdonald Orcid Logo

Abstract

In this study we examine the release on Twitter of a total of nine issues of Rumiyah, the online magazine of the so-called Islamic State. The study addresses two sets of research questions, both of which seek to build upon our earlier pilot study of the release on Twitter of issue 15 of Dabiq (the f...

Full description

Published: Europol Headquarters, The Hague 2nd European Counter Terrorism Centre Advisory Group Conference 2018
Online Access: https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/who-disseminates-rumiyah-examining-relative-influence-of-sympathiser-and-non-sympathiser-twitter-users
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa41091
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2018-07-23T19:39:32Z
last_indexed 2019-06-05T10:48:43Z
id cronfa41091
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-05-30T13:32:53.5289968</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>41091</id><entry>2018-07-23</entry><title>Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-7483-9023</ORCID><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><name>Stuart Macdonald</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2018-07-23</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>In this study we examine the release on Twitter of a total of nine issues of Rumiyah, the online magazine of the so-called Islamic State. The study addresses two sets of research questions, both of which seek to build upon our earlier pilot study of the release on Twitter of issue 15 of Dabiq (the forerunner to Rumiyah). First, our pilot study suggested that pro-IS throwaway accounts were only creating a small splash on Twitter. Has this been the case for Rumiyah? Are these pro-IS accounts being disrupted effectively, before they manage to exert much influence? Second, what is the relative influence of the pro-IS throwaway accounts in comparison to other accounts that are not sympathetic to IS, but nonetheless disseminate its propaganda &#x2013; whether that be for research purposes, personal interest or even to provide an oppositional voice or engage in debate? In other words, how great is the ripple effect generated by these non-IS sympathiser accounts?</abstract><type>Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract</type><journal/><publisher>2nd European Counter Terrorism Centre Advisory Group Conference</publisher><placeOfPublication>Europol Headquarters, The Hague</placeOfPublication><keywords>Jihadism, terrorism, propaganda, social media, Twitter</keywords><publishedDay>16</publishedDay><publishedMonth>7</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2018</publishedYear><publishedDate>2018-07-16</publishedDate><doi/><url>https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/who-disseminates-rumiyah-examining-relative-influence-of-sympathiser-and-non-sympathiser-twitter-users</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-05-30T13:32:53.5289968</lastEdited><Created>2018-07-23T14:48:20.5951916</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7483-9023</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Daniel</firstname><surname>Grinnell</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Nuria</firstname><surname>Lorenzo-Dus</surname><orcid>http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-7939</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Mair</surname><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0041091-23072018144931.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Europol2018.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2018-07-23T14:49:31.4200000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>563516</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2018-07-23T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-05-30T13:32:53.5289968 v2 41091 2018-07-23 Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98 0000-0002-7483-9023 Stuart Macdonald Stuart Macdonald true false 2018-07-23 LAWD In this study we examine the release on Twitter of a total of nine issues of Rumiyah, the online magazine of the so-called Islamic State. The study addresses two sets of research questions, both of which seek to build upon our earlier pilot study of the release on Twitter of issue 15 of Dabiq (the forerunner to Rumiyah). First, our pilot study suggested that pro-IS throwaway accounts were only creating a small splash on Twitter. Has this been the case for Rumiyah? Are these pro-IS accounts being disrupted effectively, before they manage to exert much influence? Second, what is the relative influence of the pro-IS throwaway accounts in comparison to other accounts that are not sympathetic to IS, but nonetheless disseminate its propaganda – whether that be for research purposes, personal interest or even to provide an oppositional voice or engage in debate? In other words, how great is the ripple effect generated by these non-IS sympathiser accounts? Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract 2nd European Counter Terrorism Centre Advisory Group Conference Europol Headquarters, The Hague Jihadism, terrorism, propaganda, social media, Twitter 16 7 2018 2018-07-16 https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/who-disseminates-rumiyah-examining-relative-influence-of-sympathiser-and-non-sympathiser-twitter-users COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2019-05-30T13:32:53.5289968 2018-07-23T14:48:20.5951916 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Stuart Macdonald 0000-0002-7483-9023 1 Daniel Grinnell 2 Nuria Lorenzo-Dus http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-7939 3 David Mair 4 0041091-23072018144931.pdf Europol2018.pdf 2018-07-23T14:49:31.4200000 Output 563516 application/pdf Version of Record true 2018-07-23T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
spellingShingle Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
Stuart Macdonald
title_short Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
title_full Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
title_fullStr Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
title_full_unstemmed Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
title_sort Who disseminates Rumiyah? Examining the relative influence of sympathiser and non-sympathiser Twitter users
author_id_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98
author_id_fullname_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98_***_Stuart Macdonald
author Stuart Macdonald
author2 Stuart Macdonald
Daniel Grinnell
Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
David Mair
format Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract
publishDate 2018
institution Swansea University
publisher 2nd European Counter Terrorism Centre Advisory Group Conference
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/who-disseminates-rumiyah-examining-relative-influence-of-sympathiser-and-non-sympathiser-twitter-users
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description In this study we examine the release on Twitter of a total of nine issues of Rumiyah, the online magazine of the so-called Islamic State. The study addresses two sets of research questions, both of which seek to build upon our earlier pilot study of the release on Twitter of issue 15 of Dabiq (the forerunner to Rumiyah). First, our pilot study suggested that pro-IS throwaway accounts were only creating a small splash on Twitter. Has this been the case for Rumiyah? Are these pro-IS accounts being disrupted effectively, before they manage to exert much influence? Second, what is the relative influence of the pro-IS throwaway accounts in comparison to other accounts that are not sympathetic to IS, but nonetheless disseminate its propaganda – whether that be for research purposes, personal interest or even to provide an oppositional voice or engage in debate? In other words, how great is the ripple effect generated by these non-IS sympathiser accounts?
published_date 2018-07-16T03:52:22Z
_version_ 1763752587071324160
score 10.9992285

Similar Items