No Cover Image

E-Thesis 157 views 285 downloads

Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject. / Brian Lee

Swansea University Author: Brian Lee

Abstract

"This thesis situates some letters, novels and essays by D. H. Lawrence within a frame of Julia Kristeva's later-period ideas (from Powers of Horror onwards) about the modem subject experiencing an oedipal crisis of identity, coextensive with loss of faith in cultural metaphysical discours...

Full description

Published: 2005
Institution: Swansea University
Degree level: Doctoral
Degree name: Ph.D
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42725
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2018-08-02T18:55:23Z
last_indexed 2018-08-03T10:10:55Z
id cronfa42725
recordtype RisThesis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-08-02T16:24:30.2426040</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>42725</id><entry>2018-08-02</entry><title>Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject.</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>c5398007c22d50a72af3e1fc11edffc5</sid><ORCID>NULL</ORCID><firstname>Brian</firstname><surname>Lee</surname><name>Brian Lee</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>true</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2018-08-02</date><abstract>"This thesis situates some letters, novels and essays by D. H. Lawrence within a frame of Julia Kristeva's later-period ideas (from Powers of Horror onwards) about the modem subject experiencing an oedipal crisis of identity, coextensive with loss of faith in cultural metaphysical discourse. In it, I identify a number of key Kristevan themes and perspectives: symbolist aesthetics, adolescent psychology, sacred logic, amorous discourse, and, in the last chapter, a nexus of foreignness, fascism and homosexuality. In doing so, I often take a somewhat oblique approach to Kristeva's "abject" discourse, which then feeds into my readings of Lawrence. For example, I conflate Kristeva's semiological account of the adolescent psyche with Anna Freud's seminal study of the biological adolescent, and view Lawrence accordingly. This interlacing of oedipal and pre-oedipal theory offers an innovative aetiology in regard to Kristeva, while it reflects my emphasis throughout the thesis on the artist's borderline crisis, rather than, as is more typical in Kristevan criticism, affirming the poetic imaginary. Similarly, I conflate Kristeva's account of the psychological equivalence of fascism and modem art with Klaus Theweleit's censuring analysis of fascist texts. This generates an ethical and historical register for Lawrence's para- fascist expressions, within my exploration of the semiotics of the abject text. Kristeva never mentions Lawrence, while this thesis is unique as a full-length juxtaposition of a major and much-analysed modemist and a crucial postmodem- analytic theorist. My hope is that its operation within the fields of literary studies and linguistic psychoanalysis will stimulate wider academic interest in negotiating the two writers. My Conclusion, which elaborates Kristeva's own discourse as a product of unconscious phantasy, gestures ahead to a proposed comparative study. I end the thesis by speculating about its implication with my own, possibly abject, phantasy, while insisting on the validity of the production."</abstract><type>E-Thesis</type><journal/><journalNumber></journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>British &amp;amp; Irish literature.</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2005</publishedYear><publishedDate>2005-12-31</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>English Language and Applied Linguistics</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><degreelevel>Doctoral</degreelevel><degreename>Ph.D</degreename><apcterm/><lastEdited>2018-08-02T16:24:30.2426040</lastEdited><Created>2018-08-02T16:24:30.2426040</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Brian</firstname><surname>Lee</surname><orcid>NULL</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0042725-02082018162517.pdf</filename><originalFilename>10807494.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2018-08-02T16:25:17.0900000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>11895172</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>E-Thesis</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2018-08-02T16:25:17.0900000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2018-08-02T16:24:30.2426040 v2 42725 2018-08-02 Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject. c5398007c22d50a72af3e1fc11edffc5 NULL Brian Lee Brian Lee true true 2018-08-02 "This thesis situates some letters, novels and essays by D. H. Lawrence within a frame of Julia Kristeva's later-period ideas (from Powers of Horror onwards) about the modem subject experiencing an oedipal crisis of identity, coextensive with loss of faith in cultural metaphysical discourse. In it, I identify a number of key Kristevan themes and perspectives: symbolist aesthetics, adolescent psychology, sacred logic, amorous discourse, and, in the last chapter, a nexus of foreignness, fascism and homosexuality. In doing so, I often take a somewhat oblique approach to Kristeva's "abject" discourse, which then feeds into my readings of Lawrence. For example, I conflate Kristeva's semiological account of the adolescent psyche with Anna Freud's seminal study of the biological adolescent, and view Lawrence accordingly. This interlacing of oedipal and pre-oedipal theory offers an innovative aetiology in regard to Kristeva, while it reflects my emphasis throughout the thesis on the artist's borderline crisis, rather than, as is more typical in Kristevan criticism, affirming the poetic imaginary. Similarly, I conflate Kristeva's account of the psychological equivalence of fascism and modem art with Klaus Theweleit's censuring analysis of fascist texts. This generates an ethical and historical register for Lawrence's para- fascist expressions, within my exploration of the semiotics of the abject text. Kristeva never mentions Lawrence, while this thesis is unique as a full-length juxtaposition of a major and much-analysed modemist and a crucial postmodem- analytic theorist. My hope is that its operation within the fields of literary studies and linguistic psychoanalysis will stimulate wider academic interest in negotiating the two writers. My Conclusion, which elaborates Kristeva's own discourse as a product of unconscious phantasy, gestures ahead to a proposed comparative study. I end the thesis by speculating about its implication with my own, possibly abject, phantasy, while insisting on the validity of the production." E-Thesis British &amp; Irish literature. 31 12 2005 2005-12-31 COLLEGE NANME English Language and Applied Linguistics COLLEGE CODE Swansea University Doctoral Ph.D 2018-08-02T16:24:30.2426040 2018-08-02T16:24:30.2426040 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics Brian Lee NULL 1 0042725-02082018162517.pdf 10807494.pdf 2018-08-02T16:25:17.0900000 Output 11895172 application/pdf E-Thesis true 2018-08-02T16:25:17.0900000 false
title Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject.
spellingShingle Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject.
Brian Lee
title_short Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject.
title_full Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject.
title_fullStr Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject.
title_full_unstemmed Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject.
title_sort Maladies of the modern soul: Kristeva, Lawrence, and the post-metaphysical subject.
author_id_str_mv c5398007c22d50a72af3e1fc11edffc5
author_id_fullname_str_mv c5398007c22d50a72af3e1fc11edffc5_***_Brian Lee
author Brian Lee
author2 Brian Lee
format E-Thesis
publishDate 2005
institution Swansea University
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description "This thesis situates some letters, novels and essays by D. H. Lawrence within a frame of Julia Kristeva's later-period ideas (from Powers of Horror onwards) about the modem subject experiencing an oedipal crisis of identity, coextensive with loss of faith in cultural metaphysical discourse. In it, I identify a number of key Kristevan themes and perspectives: symbolist aesthetics, adolescent psychology, sacred logic, amorous discourse, and, in the last chapter, a nexus of foreignness, fascism and homosexuality. In doing so, I often take a somewhat oblique approach to Kristeva's "abject" discourse, which then feeds into my readings of Lawrence. For example, I conflate Kristeva's semiological account of the adolescent psyche with Anna Freud's seminal study of the biological adolescent, and view Lawrence accordingly. This interlacing of oedipal and pre-oedipal theory offers an innovative aetiology in regard to Kristeva, while it reflects my emphasis throughout the thesis on the artist's borderline crisis, rather than, as is more typical in Kristevan criticism, affirming the poetic imaginary. Similarly, I conflate Kristeva's account of the psychological equivalence of fascism and modem art with Klaus Theweleit's censuring analysis of fascist texts. This generates an ethical and historical register for Lawrence's para- fascist expressions, within my exploration of the semiotics of the abject text. Kristeva never mentions Lawrence, while this thesis is unique as a full-length juxtaposition of a major and much-analysed modemist and a crucial postmodem- analytic theorist. My hope is that its operation within the fields of literary studies and linguistic psychoanalysis will stimulate wider academic interest in negotiating the two writers. My Conclusion, which elaborates Kristeva's own discourse as a product of unconscious phantasy, gestures ahead to a proposed comparative study. I end the thesis by speculating about its implication with my own, possibly abject, phantasy, while insisting on the validity of the production."
published_date 2005-12-31T03:53:31Z
_version_ 1763752659631734784
score 11.012723

Similar Items