No Cover Image

Book chapter 822 views

'"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas'

John Goodby

Reading Dylan Thomas, ed. Edward Allen, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Pages: 91 - 109

Swansea University Author: John Goodby

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

Abstract

Developing an argument first raised in The Poetry of Dylan Thomas: Under the Spelling Wall (2013), this chapter explores the relationship between Dylan Thomas's poetry and contemporary scientific knowledge, referencing popular science titles published in the 1920s and 1930s and the advances in...

Full description

Published in: Reading Dylan Thomas, ed. Edward Allen
ISSN: 978-1-4744-1155-4
Published: Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press 2018
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa49125
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2019-03-05T20:00:06Z
last_indexed 2021-01-27T04:09:33Z
id cronfa49125
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-01-26T20:32:15.1613189</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>49125</id><entry>2019-03-05</entry><title>'"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas'</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>a342893822b30da6f736641802def9ab</sid><firstname>John</firstname><surname>Goodby</surname><name>John Goodby</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-03-05</date><deptcode>FGHSS</deptcode><abstract>Developing an argument first raised in The Poetry of Dylan Thomas: Under the Spelling Wall (2013), this chapter explores the relationship between Dylan Thomas's poetry and contemporary scientific knowledge, referencing popular science titles published in the 1920s and 1930s and the advances in science known to Thomas through other media. The aim of the chapter is to show that, far from being a romantic anti-rationalist, Thomas was well aware of developments in hormone and gland science, post-Einsteinian physics, Darwinian biology, and psychology. These informed his 'process poetic' and its microcosmic/macrocosmic coordinates, and formed the basis for the struggle between determinism and free will played out in his early work. Thomas's interest in embryos / foetuses is linked to the homeostatic concept of the body developed by Walter Cannon and Lawrence J. Henderson, which opposed the determinism espoused by B. F. Skinner and other disciples of Jacques Loeb and Ivan Pavlov. Thomas's immersion in scientific discourse is seen, together with his processual attitude to language, to account for the fact that, while he shares his vitalism and archetypal blood and soil imagery with writers such as D.H. Lawrence, he does not share their reactionary essentialism (Joyce being the High Modernist Thomas most resembles in this regard). The final part of the chapter analyses Thomas's attribution, from the late 1930s on, of a redemptive role to sexual love, and his response to the horrific events of WWII. These, it is argued, led to a precariously holistic 'green' and proto-feminist vision of the natural world under the shadow of the Bomb. Finally, this section considers Thomas's attitude to religion - which many scientists for the time managed to reconcile with the new science - which is understood as more an interest in the mechanisms of belief and religious discourses than as faith as such.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>Reading Dylan Thomas, ed. Edward Allen</journal><volume>1</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>91</paginationStart><paginationEnd>109</paginationEnd><publisher>Edinburgh University Press</publisher><placeOfPublication>Edinburgh</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>978-1-4744-1155-4</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Dylan Thomas, science, physics, glands, hormones, Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud, Alfred North Whitehead, James Jeans, Arthur Eddington, Edwin Hubble, spacetime, evolution, sex, Ernest Starling, &amp;apos;The Map of Love&amp;apos;, &amp;apos;And Death Shall Have No Dominion&amp;apos;, Aldous Huxley, Ivan Pavlov, eugenics, Lawrence J. Henderson, homeostasis</keywords><publishedDay>21</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2018</publishedYear><publishedDate>2018-11-21</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes>As acknowledged in Edward Allen's Introduction, this volume arose from a symposium held at Cambridge University in November of 2014, Dylan Thomas's centenary year, which itself arose - as its publicity material noted - from my critical and editorial work on Thomas's poetry. I could therefore be seen as an enabler of this volume, and Ned Allen acknowledges me as an enabler and something of an inspiration in his Acknowledgements and Introduction.</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGHSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-01-26T20:32:15.1613189</lastEdited><Created>2019-03-05T18:14:49.8468563</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing</level></path><authors><author><firstname>John</firstname><surname>Goodby</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2021-01-26T20:32:15.1613189 v2 49125 2019-03-05 '"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas' a342893822b30da6f736641802def9ab John Goodby John Goodby true false 2019-03-05 FGHSS Developing an argument first raised in The Poetry of Dylan Thomas: Under the Spelling Wall (2013), this chapter explores the relationship between Dylan Thomas's poetry and contemporary scientific knowledge, referencing popular science titles published in the 1920s and 1930s and the advances in science known to Thomas through other media. The aim of the chapter is to show that, far from being a romantic anti-rationalist, Thomas was well aware of developments in hormone and gland science, post-Einsteinian physics, Darwinian biology, and psychology. These informed his 'process poetic' and its microcosmic/macrocosmic coordinates, and formed the basis for the struggle between determinism and free will played out in his early work. Thomas's interest in embryos / foetuses is linked to the homeostatic concept of the body developed by Walter Cannon and Lawrence J. Henderson, which opposed the determinism espoused by B. F. Skinner and other disciples of Jacques Loeb and Ivan Pavlov. Thomas's immersion in scientific discourse is seen, together with his processual attitude to language, to account for the fact that, while he shares his vitalism and archetypal blood and soil imagery with writers such as D.H. Lawrence, he does not share their reactionary essentialism (Joyce being the High Modernist Thomas most resembles in this regard). The final part of the chapter analyses Thomas's attribution, from the late 1930s on, of a redemptive role to sexual love, and his response to the horrific events of WWII. These, it is argued, led to a precariously holistic 'green' and proto-feminist vision of the natural world under the shadow of the Bomb. Finally, this section considers Thomas's attitude to religion - which many scientists for the time managed to reconcile with the new science - which is understood as more an interest in the mechanisms of belief and religious discourses than as faith as such. Book chapter Reading Dylan Thomas, ed. Edward Allen 1 1 91 109 Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh 978-1-4744-1155-4 Dylan Thomas, science, physics, glands, hormones, Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud, Alfred North Whitehead, James Jeans, Arthur Eddington, Edwin Hubble, spacetime, evolution, sex, Ernest Starling, &apos;The Map of Love&apos;, &apos;And Death Shall Have No Dominion&apos;, Aldous Huxley, Ivan Pavlov, eugenics, Lawrence J. Henderson, homeostasis 21 11 2018 2018-11-21 As acknowledged in Edward Allen's Introduction, this volume arose from a symposium held at Cambridge University in November of 2014, Dylan Thomas's centenary year, which itself arose - as its publicity material noted - from my critical and editorial work on Thomas's poetry. I could therefore be seen as an enabler of this volume, and Ned Allen acknowledges me as an enabler and something of an inspiration in his Acknowledgements and Introduction. COLLEGE NANME Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGHSS Swansea University 2021-01-26T20:32:15.1613189 2019-03-05T18:14:49.8468563 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing John Goodby 1
title '"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas'
spellingShingle '"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas'
John Goodby
title_short '"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas'
title_full '"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas'
title_fullStr '"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas'
title_full_unstemmed '"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas'
title_sort '"Lamp-posts and high-volted fruits": Scientific Discourse in the Work of Dylan Thomas'
author_id_str_mv a342893822b30da6f736641802def9ab
author_id_fullname_str_mv a342893822b30da6f736641802def9ab_***_John Goodby
author John Goodby
author2 John Goodby
format Book chapter
container_title Reading Dylan Thomas, ed. Edward Allen
container_volume 1
container_issue 1
container_start_page 91
publishDate 2018
institution Swansea University
issn 978-1-4744-1155-4
publisher Edinburgh University Press
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Developing an argument first raised in The Poetry of Dylan Thomas: Under the Spelling Wall (2013), this chapter explores the relationship between Dylan Thomas's poetry and contemporary scientific knowledge, referencing popular science titles published in the 1920s and 1930s and the advances in science known to Thomas through other media. The aim of the chapter is to show that, far from being a romantic anti-rationalist, Thomas was well aware of developments in hormone and gland science, post-Einsteinian physics, Darwinian biology, and psychology. These informed his 'process poetic' and its microcosmic/macrocosmic coordinates, and formed the basis for the struggle between determinism and free will played out in his early work. Thomas's interest in embryos / foetuses is linked to the homeostatic concept of the body developed by Walter Cannon and Lawrence J. Henderson, which opposed the determinism espoused by B. F. Skinner and other disciples of Jacques Loeb and Ivan Pavlov. Thomas's immersion in scientific discourse is seen, together with his processual attitude to language, to account for the fact that, while he shares his vitalism and archetypal blood and soil imagery with writers such as D.H. Lawrence, he does not share their reactionary essentialism (Joyce being the High Modernist Thomas most resembles in this regard). The final part of the chapter analyses Thomas's attribution, from the late 1930s on, of a redemptive role to sexual love, and his response to the horrific events of WWII. These, it is argued, led to a precariously holistic 'green' and proto-feminist vision of the natural world under the shadow of the Bomb. Finally, this section considers Thomas's attitude to religion - which many scientists for the time managed to reconcile with the new science - which is understood as more an interest in the mechanisms of belief and religious discourses than as faith as such.
published_date 2018-11-21T03:59:54Z
_version_ 1763753061117853696
score 11.0128355

Similar Items