No Cover Image

EThesis 48 views 46 downloads

A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients / Turki U. Almatani

DOI (Published version): 10.23889/Suthesis.50330

Abstract

Objective: Cone beam CT (CBCT) images contain more scatter than a conventional CT image and therefore provide inaccurate Hounsfield units (HU). Consequently CBCT images cannot be used directly for radiotherapy dose calculation. The aim of this study is to enable dose calculations to be performed wit...

Full description

Published: 2017
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa50330
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2019-05-14T14:00:15Z
last_indexed 2019-10-21T16:56:02Z
id cronfa50330
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-05-16T15:48:33.9047946</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>50330</id><entry>2019-05-13</entry><title>A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients</title><swanseaauthors/><date>2019-05-13</date><abstract>Objective: Cone beam CT (CBCT) images contain more scatter than a conventional CT image and therefore provide inaccurate Hounsfield units (HU). Consequently CBCT images cannot be used directly for radiotherapy dose calculation. The aim of this study is to enable dose calculations to be performed with the use of CBCT images taken during radiotherapy and evaluate the necessity of re-planning. Methods: A phantom, a standard prostate cancer patient and prostate cancer patients with single and double metallic hips were imaged using both CT and CBCT. A multilevel threshold algorithm (MLT) was used to categorise pixel values in the CBCT images into segments of homogeneous HU. The variation in HU with position in the CBCT images was taken into consideration and the benefit of using a large number of materials has been explored. This segmentation method relies upon the operator dividing the CBCT data into a set of volumes where the variation in the relationship between pixel values and HUs is small. In addition, an automated MLT algorithm was developed to reduce the operator time associated with the process. Furthermore, magnetic resonance (MR) images of the standard prostate case were segmented and converted into HUs using the MLT algorithm. Radiotherapy treatment plans were generated from CT images and then copied to the segmented CBCT and MR data sets and the doses were recalculated and compared using pencil beam (PB), collapsed cone (CC) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms. Results: Compared with the planning CT (pCT) treatment plan, in the phantom case, a gamma evaluation showed all points in planning target volume (PTV), rectum and bladder had gamma value &amp;lt; 1 (3%/3 mm) in the segmented CBCT, when considering only 2 material bins, water and bone. For the standard patient case, using 3 materials, air, water and bone, was accurate enough to provide accurate dose calculations with differences of less than 2%. For the patient with a metallic hip, increasing the number of bins to define the material type from 7 materials to 8 materials, required 50% more operator time to improve the accuracy by 0.01% using PB and CC and 0.05% when using MC algorithms. The use of 5 values of HU (air, adipose, water, bone and metal implant) gave the best balance between dose accuracy and operator time (3.5 hours). For the patient with double hip prosthetics, segmenting CBCT into 5 materials with the MLT algorithm showed &#x2013;0.46% dose difference with 8 hours operator time, whilst the automated MLT algorithm showed &#x2013;1.36%. For the standard case, the segmentation of MR images, into 3 materials, resulted in a dose difference of &#x2013;1.31% with 2 hours operator time. Conclusion: The segmentation of CBCT images using the method in this study can be used for dose calculation. For a simple phantom and standard prostate case, 2 and 3 values of HU were needed to improve dose calculation accuracy, respectively. For patients with additional anatomical inhomogeneities such as metallic hips, 5 values of HU were found to be needed, giving a reasonable balance between dose accuracy and operator time. The automated MLT algorithm reduced the operator time associated with implementing the MLT algorithm to achieve clinically acceptable accuracy. This saved time makes the automated MLT algorithm superior and easier to implement in the clinical setting. The MLT method can be applicable for the dose calculation on MR images and can be of interest to MRI-only based radiotherapy treatment planning.</abstract><type>EThesis</type><journal/><publisher/><keywords>CBCT, ART, IGRT, MR-based dose calculation, multilevel threshold algorithm</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.23889/Suthesis.50330</doi><url/><notes>A selection of third party content is redacted or is partially redacted from this thesis.</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><lastEdited>2019-05-16T15:48:33.9047946</lastEdited><Created>2019-05-13T15:39:07.0858201</Created><path><level id="1">Swansea University Medical School</level><level id="2">Swansea University Medical School</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Turki U.</firstname><surname>Almatani</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0050330-13052019154851.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Almatani_Turki_U_PhD_Thesis_Final._Redacted.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-05-13T15:48:51.9270000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>18946408</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Redacted version - open access</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><action/><embargoDate>2019-05-12T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect></document></documents></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-05-16T15:48:33.9047946 v2 50330 2019-05-13 A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients 2019-05-13 Objective: Cone beam CT (CBCT) images contain more scatter than a conventional CT image and therefore provide inaccurate Hounsfield units (HU). Consequently CBCT images cannot be used directly for radiotherapy dose calculation. The aim of this study is to enable dose calculations to be performed with the use of CBCT images taken during radiotherapy and evaluate the necessity of re-planning. Methods: A phantom, a standard prostate cancer patient and prostate cancer patients with single and double metallic hips were imaged using both CT and CBCT. A multilevel threshold algorithm (MLT) was used to categorise pixel values in the CBCT images into segments of homogeneous HU. The variation in HU with position in the CBCT images was taken into consideration and the benefit of using a large number of materials has been explored. This segmentation method relies upon the operator dividing the CBCT data into a set of volumes where the variation in the relationship between pixel values and HUs is small. In addition, an automated MLT algorithm was developed to reduce the operator time associated with the process. Furthermore, magnetic resonance (MR) images of the standard prostate case were segmented and converted into HUs using the MLT algorithm. Radiotherapy treatment plans were generated from CT images and then copied to the segmented CBCT and MR data sets and the doses were recalculated and compared using pencil beam (PB), collapsed cone (CC) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms. Results: Compared with the planning CT (pCT) treatment plan, in the phantom case, a gamma evaluation showed all points in planning target volume (PTV), rectum and bladder had gamma value &lt; 1 (3%/3 mm) in the segmented CBCT, when considering only 2 material bins, water and bone. For the standard patient case, using 3 materials, air, water and bone, was accurate enough to provide accurate dose calculations with differences of less than 2%. For the patient with a metallic hip, increasing the number of bins to define the material type from 7 materials to 8 materials, required 50% more operator time to improve the accuracy by 0.01% using PB and CC and 0.05% when using MC algorithms. The use of 5 values of HU (air, adipose, water, bone and metal implant) gave the best balance between dose accuracy and operator time (3.5 hours). For the patient with double hip prosthetics, segmenting CBCT into 5 materials with the MLT algorithm showed –0.46% dose difference with 8 hours operator time, whilst the automated MLT algorithm showed –1.36%. For the standard case, the segmentation of MR images, into 3 materials, resulted in a dose difference of –1.31% with 2 hours operator time. Conclusion: The segmentation of CBCT images using the method in this study can be used for dose calculation. For a simple phantom and standard prostate case, 2 and 3 values of HU were needed to improve dose calculation accuracy, respectively. For patients with additional anatomical inhomogeneities such as metallic hips, 5 values of HU were found to be needed, giving a reasonable balance between dose accuracy and operator time. The automated MLT algorithm reduced the operator time associated with implementing the MLT algorithm to achieve clinically acceptable accuracy. This saved time makes the automated MLT algorithm superior and easier to implement in the clinical setting. The MLT method can be applicable for the dose calculation on MR images and can be of interest to MRI-only based radiotherapy treatment planning. EThesis CBCT, ART, IGRT, MR-based dose calculation, multilevel threshold algorithm 31 12 2017 2017-12-31 10.23889/Suthesis.50330 A selection of third party content is redacted or is partially redacted from this thesis. COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University 2019-05-16T15:48:33.9047946 2019-05-13T15:39:07.0858201 Swansea University Medical School Swansea University Medical School Turki U. Almatani 1 0050330-13052019154851.pdf Almatani_Turki_U_PhD_Thesis_Final._Redacted.pdf 2019-05-13T15:48:51.9270000 Output 18946408 application/pdf Redacted version - open access true 2019-05-12T00:00:00.0000000 true
title A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients
spellingShingle A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients
,
title_short A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients
title_full A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients
title_fullStr A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients
title_sort A Rapid Dosimetric Assessment Method Using Cone Beam CT in Prostate Cancer Patients
author ,
author2 Turki U. Almatani
format EThesis
publishDate 2017
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.23889/Suthesis.50330
college_str Swansea University Medical School
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id swanseauniversitymedicalschool
hierarchy_top_title Swansea University Medical School
hierarchy_parent_id swanseauniversitymedicalschool
hierarchy_parent_title Swansea University Medical School
department_str Swansea University Medical School{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Objective: Cone beam CT (CBCT) images contain more scatter than a conventional CT image and therefore provide inaccurate Hounsfield units (HU). Consequently CBCT images cannot be used directly for radiotherapy dose calculation. The aim of this study is to enable dose calculations to be performed with the use of CBCT images taken during radiotherapy and evaluate the necessity of re-planning. Methods: A phantom, a standard prostate cancer patient and prostate cancer patients with single and double metallic hips were imaged using both CT and CBCT. A multilevel threshold algorithm (MLT) was used to categorise pixel values in the CBCT images into segments of homogeneous HU. The variation in HU with position in the CBCT images was taken into consideration and the benefit of using a large number of materials has been explored. This segmentation method relies upon the operator dividing the CBCT data into a set of volumes where the variation in the relationship between pixel values and HUs is small. In addition, an automated MLT algorithm was developed to reduce the operator time associated with the process. Furthermore, magnetic resonance (MR) images of the standard prostate case were segmented and converted into HUs using the MLT algorithm. Radiotherapy treatment plans were generated from CT images and then copied to the segmented CBCT and MR data sets and the doses were recalculated and compared using pencil beam (PB), collapsed cone (CC) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms. Results: Compared with the planning CT (pCT) treatment plan, in the phantom case, a gamma evaluation showed all points in planning target volume (PTV), rectum and bladder had gamma value &lt; 1 (3%/3 mm) in the segmented CBCT, when considering only 2 material bins, water and bone. For the standard patient case, using 3 materials, air, water and bone, was accurate enough to provide accurate dose calculations with differences of less than 2%. For the patient with a metallic hip, increasing the number of bins to define the material type from 7 materials to 8 materials, required 50% more operator time to improve the accuracy by 0.01% using PB and CC and 0.05% when using MC algorithms. The use of 5 values of HU (air, adipose, water, bone and metal implant) gave the best balance between dose accuracy and operator time (3.5 hours). For the patient with double hip prosthetics, segmenting CBCT into 5 materials with the MLT algorithm showed –0.46% dose difference with 8 hours operator time, whilst the automated MLT algorithm showed –1.36%. For the standard case, the segmentation of MR images, into 3 materials, resulted in a dose difference of –1.31% with 2 hours operator time. Conclusion: The segmentation of CBCT images using the method in this study can be used for dose calculation. For a simple phantom and standard prostate case, 2 and 3 values of HU were needed to improve dose calculation accuracy, respectively. For patients with additional anatomical inhomogeneities such as metallic hips, 5 values of HU were found to be needed, giving a reasonable balance between dose accuracy and operator time. The automated MLT algorithm reduced the operator time associated with implementing the MLT algorithm to achieve clinically acceptable accuracy. This saved time makes the automated MLT algorithm superior and easier to implement in the clinical setting. The MLT method can be applicable for the dose calculation on MR images and can be of interest to MRI-only based radiotherapy treatment planning.
published_date 2017-12-31T20:10:57Z
_version_ 1671948829754130432
score 10.735897