Journal article 1211 views
A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Volume: 11, Issue: 6, Pages: 763 - 767
Swansea University Author:
Richard Bracken
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0508
Abstract
Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva sa...
Published in: | International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1555-0265 1555-0273 |
Published: |
2016
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa50342 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2019-05-14T14:00:17Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2019-08-15T21:26:16Z |
id |
cronfa50342 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-08-15T16:26:53.0875132</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>50342</id><entry>2019-05-14</entry><title>A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>f5da81cd18adfdedb2ccb845bddc12f7</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-6986-6449</ORCID><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Bracken</surname><name>Richard Bracken</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-05-14</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva samples before PM assessments of countermovement-jump height, reaction time, and repeated-sprint ability. Control (passive rest), weights (bench press: 5 × 10 repetitions, 75% 1-repetition maximum, 90-s intraset recovery), cycling (6 × 6-s maximal sprint cycling, 7.5% body mass load, 54-s intraset recovery), and running (6 × 40-m maximal sprints, 20-s intraset recovery) interventions preceded (~5 h) PM testing.Results:PM sprint performance improved (P < .05) after weights (>0.15 ± 0.19 s, >2.04% ± 2.46%) and running (>0.15 ± 0.17 s, >2.12% ± 2.22%) but not cycling (P > .05). PM jump height increased after cycling (0.012 ± 0.009 m, 2.31% ± 1.76%, P < .001) and running (0.020 ± 0.009 m, 3.90% ± 1.79%, P < .001) but not weights (P = .936). Reaction time remained unchanged between trials (P = .379). Relative to control (131 ± 21 pg/mL), PM testosterone was greater in weights (21 ± 23 pg/mL, 17% ± 18%, P = .002) and running (28 ± 26 pg/mL, 22% ± 20%, P = .001) but not cycling (P = .072). Salivary cortisol was unaffected by AM exercise (P = .540).Conclusions:All modes of AM exercise improved at least 1 marker of PM performance, but running appeared the most beneficial to professional rugby union players. A rationale therefore exists for preceding PM competition with AM exercise.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance</journal><volume>11</volume><journalNumber>6</journalNumber><paginationStart>763</paginationStart><paginationEnd>767</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>1555-0265</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1555-0273</issnElectronic><keywords>ergogenic, potentiation, hormone, rugby</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2016</publishedYear><publishedDate>2016-09-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1123/ijspp.2015-0508</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-08-15T16:26:53.0875132</lastEdited><Created>2019-05-14T10:15:34.9320321</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Russell</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Aden</firstname><surname>King</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Bracken</surname><orcid>0000-0002-6986-6449</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Christian. J.</firstname><surname>Cook</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Thibault</firstname><surname>Giroud</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Liam. P.</firstname><surname>Kilduff</surname><order>6</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2019-08-15T16:26:53.0875132 v2 50342 2019-05-14 A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance f5da81cd18adfdedb2ccb845bddc12f7 0000-0002-6986-6449 Richard Bracken Richard Bracken true false 2019-05-14 STSC Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva samples before PM assessments of countermovement-jump height, reaction time, and repeated-sprint ability. Control (passive rest), weights (bench press: 5 × 10 repetitions, 75% 1-repetition maximum, 90-s intraset recovery), cycling (6 × 6-s maximal sprint cycling, 7.5% body mass load, 54-s intraset recovery), and running (6 × 40-m maximal sprints, 20-s intraset recovery) interventions preceded (~5 h) PM testing.Results:PM sprint performance improved (P < .05) after weights (>0.15 ± 0.19 s, >2.04% ± 2.46%) and running (>0.15 ± 0.17 s, >2.12% ± 2.22%) but not cycling (P > .05). PM jump height increased after cycling (0.012 ± 0.009 m, 2.31% ± 1.76%, P < .001) and running (0.020 ± 0.009 m, 3.90% ± 1.79%, P < .001) but not weights (P = .936). Reaction time remained unchanged between trials (P = .379). Relative to control (131 ± 21 pg/mL), PM testosterone was greater in weights (21 ± 23 pg/mL, 17% ± 18%, P = .002) and running (28 ± 26 pg/mL, 22% ± 20%, P = .001) but not cycling (P = .072). Salivary cortisol was unaffected by AM exercise (P = .540).Conclusions:All modes of AM exercise improved at least 1 marker of PM performance, but running appeared the most beneficial to professional rugby union players. A rationale therefore exists for preceding PM competition with AM exercise. Journal Article International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 11 6 763 767 1555-0265 1555-0273 ergogenic, potentiation, hormone, rugby 30 9 2016 2016-09-30 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0508 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University 2019-08-15T16:26:53.0875132 2019-05-14T10:15:34.9320321 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Mark Russell 1 Aden King 2 Richard Bracken 0000-0002-6986-6449 3 Christian. J. Cook 4 Thibault Giroud 5 Liam. P. Kilduff 6 |
title |
A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance |
spellingShingle |
A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance Richard Bracken |
title_short |
A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance |
title_full |
A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance |
title_sort |
A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance |
author_id_str_mv |
f5da81cd18adfdedb2ccb845bddc12f7 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
f5da81cd18adfdedb2ccb845bddc12f7_***_Richard Bracken |
author |
Richard Bracken |
author2 |
Mark Russell Aden King Richard Bracken Christian. J. Cook Thibault Giroud Liam. P. Kilduff |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance |
container_volume |
11 |
container_issue |
6 |
container_start_page |
763 |
publishDate |
2016 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1555-0265 1555-0273 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1123/ijspp.2015-0508 |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva samples before PM assessments of countermovement-jump height, reaction time, and repeated-sprint ability. Control (passive rest), weights (bench press: 5 × 10 repetitions, 75% 1-repetition maximum, 90-s intraset recovery), cycling (6 × 6-s maximal sprint cycling, 7.5% body mass load, 54-s intraset recovery), and running (6 × 40-m maximal sprints, 20-s intraset recovery) interventions preceded (~5 h) PM testing.Results:PM sprint performance improved (P < .05) after weights (>0.15 ± 0.19 s, >2.04% ± 2.46%) and running (>0.15 ± 0.17 s, >2.12% ± 2.22%) but not cycling (P > .05). PM jump height increased after cycling (0.012 ± 0.009 m, 2.31% ± 1.76%, P < .001) and running (0.020 ± 0.009 m, 3.90% ± 1.79%, P < .001) but not weights (P = .936). Reaction time remained unchanged between trials (P = .379). Relative to control (131 ± 21 pg/mL), PM testosterone was greater in weights (21 ± 23 pg/mL, 17% ± 18%, P = .002) and running (28 ± 26 pg/mL, 22% ± 20%, P = .001) but not cycling (P = .072). Salivary cortisol was unaffected by AM exercise (P = .540).Conclusions:All modes of AM exercise improved at least 1 marker of PM performance, but running appeared the most beneficial to professional rugby union players. A rationale therefore exists for preceding PM competition with AM exercise. |
published_date |
2016-09-30T04:01:46Z |
_version_ |
1763753178543685632 |
score |
11.021648 |