No Cover Image

Book chapter 813 views

‘The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections’

Jukka Snell

Swansea University Author: Jukka Snell

Abstract

<p>The chapter seeks to offer some normative remarks relating to the EU doctrine of abuse of rights, in particular in the light of the ruling of the European Court of Justice in Emsland.  It proceeds in two stages, first discussing the very need for the doctrine and then considering...

Full description

Published: in R de la Feria and S Vogenauer (eds), Prohibition of Abuse of Law: A New General Principle of EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2011). 2011
Online Access: http://www.hartpub.co.uk/books/details.asp?isbn=9781841139388
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa5036
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2014-01-09T02:36:01Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:31:02Z
id cronfa5036
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2014-01-08T07:55:22.9334960</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>5036</id><entry>2011-10-01</entry><title>&#x2018;The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections&#x2019;</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1</sid><firstname>Jukka</firstname><surname>Snell</surname><name>Jukka Snell</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2011-10-01</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;The chapter seeks to offer some normative remarks relating to the EU doctrine of abuse of rights, in particular in the light of the ruling of the European Court of Justice in Emsland. &#xA0;It&#xA0;proceeds in two stages, first discussing the very need for the doctrine and then considering the actual test put forward by the Court. It is argued that while the doctrine of abuse of rights is a necessary feature of Union law, it is questionable whether it was given the optimal form in the two-part Emsland test.&amp;#60;/p&amp;#62;</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal/><publisher>in R de la Feria and S Vogenauer (eds), Prohibition of Abuse of Law: A New General Principle of EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2011).</publisher><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2011</publishedYear><publishedDate>2011-06-01</publishedDate><doi/><url>http://www.hartpub.co.uk/books/details.asp?isbn=9781841139388</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2014-01-08T07:55:22.9334960</lastEdited><Created>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Jukka</firstname><surname>Snell</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2014-01-08T07:55:22.9334960 v2 5036 2011-10-01 ‘The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections’ 888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1 Jukka Snell Jukka Snell true false 2011-10-01 LAWD &#60;p&#62;The chapter seeks to offer some normative remarks relating to the EU doctrine of abuse of rights, in particular in the light of the ruling of the European Court of Justice in Emsland.  It proceeds in two stages, first discussing the very need for the doctrine and then considering the actual test put forward by the Court. It is argued that while the doctrine of abuse of rights is a necessary feature of Union law, it is questionable whether it was given the optimal form in the two-part Emsland test.&#60;/p&#62; Book chapter in R de la Feria and S Vogenauer (eds), Prohibition of Abuse of Law: A New General Principle of EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2011). 1 6 2011 2011-06-01 http://www.hartpub.co.uk/books/details.asp?isbn=9781841139388 COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2014-01-08T07:55:22.9334960 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Jukka Snell 1
title ‘The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections’
spellingShingle ‘The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections’
Jukka Snell
title_short ‘The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections’
title_full ‘The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections’
title_fullStr ‘The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections’
title_full_unstemmed ‘The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections’
title_sort ‘The notion of and a general test for abuse of rights: some normative reflections’
author_id_str_mv 888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1
author_id_fullname_str_mv 888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1_***_Jukka Snell
author Jukka Snell
author2 Jukka Snell
format Book chapter
publishDate 2011
institution Swansea University
publisher in R de la Feria and S Vogenauer (eds), Prohibition of Abuse of Law: A New General Principle of EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2011).
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url http://www.hartpub.co.uk/books/details.asp?isbn=9781841139388
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description &#60;p&#62;The chapter seeks to offer some normative remarks relating to the EU doctrine of abuse of rights, in particular in the light of the ruling of the European Court of Justice in Emsland.  It proceeds in two stages, first discussing the very need for the doctrine and then considering the actual test put forward by the Court. It is argued that while the doctrine of abuse of rights is a necessary feature of Union law, it is questionable whether it was given the optimal form in the two-part Emsland test.&#60;/p&#62;
published_date 2011-06-01T03:05:58Z
_version_ 1763749667707813888
score 11.017797

Similar Items