No Cover Image

Book chapter 1958 views

Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood?

Andrew Tettenborn Orcid Logo

Contract Formation & Parties (The Oxford-Norton Rose Law Colloquium), Pages: 183 - 204

Swansea University Author: Andrew Tettenborn Orcid Logo

Abstract

English law continues to be ambivalent about anti-assignment clauses in contracts: saying that they are effective, while at the same time accepting the possibility of a declaration of trust of the benefit of an obligation incapable of equitable assignment. In addition there continues to be confusion...

Full description

Published in: Contract Formation & Parties (The Oxford-Norton Rose Law Colloquium)
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 2010
Online Access: http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199583706.do#.UmZOEHBwo1I
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa5045
first_indexed 2013-07-23T11:51:37Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:31:03Z
id cronfa5045
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2013-10-28T11:14:17.3341960</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>5045</id><entry>2011-10-01</entry><title>Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-8025-5630</ORCID><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Tettenborn</surname><name>Andrew Tettenborn</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2011-10-01</date><deptcode>HRCL</deptcode><abstract>English law continues to be ambivalent about anti-assignment clauses in contracts: saying that they are effective, while at the same time accepting the possibility of a declaration of trust of the benefit of an obligation incapable of equitable assignment. In addition there continues to be confusion over the relation between assignment, champerty and non-assignability.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>Contract Formation &amp; Parties (The Oxford-Norton Rose Law Colloquium)</journal><volume></volume><journalNumber></journalNumber><paginationStart>183</paginationStart><paginationEnd>204</paginationEnd><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><placeOfPublication>Oxford</placeOfPublication><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2010</publishedYear><publishedDate>2010-12-31</publishedDate><doi/><url>http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199583706.do#.UmZOEHBwo1I</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HRCL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2013-10-28T11:14:17.3341960</lastEdited><Created>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Tettenborn</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8025-5630</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2013-10-28T11:14:17.3341960 v2 5045 2011-10-01 Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood? 32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2 0000-0002-8025-5630 Andrew Tettenborn Andrew Tettenborn true false 2011-10-01 HRCL English law continues to be ambivalent about anti-assignment clauses in contracts: saying that they are effective, while at the same time accepting the possibility of a declaration of trust of the benefit of an obligation incapable of equitable assignment. In addition there continues to be confusion over the relation between assignment, champerty and non-assignability. Book chapter Contract Formation & Parties (The Oxford-Norton Rose Law Colloquium) 183 204 Oxford University Press Oxford 31 12 2010 2010-12-31 http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199583706.do#.UmZOEHBwo1I COLLEGE NANME Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School COLLEGE CODE HRCL Swansea University 2013-10-28T11:14:17.3341960 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Andrew Tettenborn 0000-0002-8025-5630 1
title Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood?
spellingShingle Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood?
Andrew Tettenborn
title_short Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood?
title_full Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood?
title_fullStr Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood?
title_full_unstemmed Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood?
title_sort Problems in Assignment Law: Not yet out of the wood?
author_id_str_mv 32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2
author_id_fullname_str_mv 32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2_***_Andrew Tettenborn
author Andrew Tettenborn
author2 Andrew Tettenborn
format Book chapter
container_title Contract Formation & Parties (The Oxford-Norton Rose Law Colloquium)
container_start_page 183
publishDate 2010
institution Swansea University
publisher Oxford University Press
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199583706.do#.UmZOEHBwo1I
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description English law continues to be ambivalent about anti-assignment clauses in contracts: saying that they are effective, while at the same time accepting the possibility of a declaration of trust of the benefit of an obligation incapable of equitable assignment. In addition there continues to be confusion over the relation between assignment, champerty and non-assignability.
published_date 2010-12-31T03:09:04Z
_version_ 1851632695313956864
score 11.089967

Similar Items