Journal article 124 views 42 downloads
Comparison of a point-of-care analyser for the determination of HbA1c with HPLC method / D.A. Grant; G.J. Dunseath; R. Churm; S.D. Luzio; Gareth Dunseath; Stephen Luzio; Rachel Churm
Practical Laboratory Medicine, Volume: 8, Pages: 26 - 29
PDF | Version of Record
Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY).Download (923.82KB)
As the use of Point of Care Testing (POCT) devices for measurement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) increases, it is imperative to determine how their performance compares to laboratory methods. This study compared the performance of the automated Quo-Test POCT device (EKF Diagnostics), which uses bo...
|Published in:||Practical Laboratory Medicine|
Check full text
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
As the use of Point of Care Testing (POCT) devices for measurement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) increases, it is imperative to determine how their performance compares to laboratory methods. This study compared the performance of the automated Quo-Test POCT device (EKF Diagnostics), which uses boronate fluorescence quenching technology, with a laboratory based High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method (Biorad D10) for measurement of HbA1c.MethodsWhole blood EDTA samples from subjects (n=100) with and without diabetes were assayed using a BioRad D10 and a Quo-Test analyser. Intra-assay variation was determined by measuring six HbA1c samples in triplicate and inter-assay variation was determined by assaying four samples on 4 days. Stability was determined by assaying three samples stored at −20 °C for 14 and 28 days post collection.ResultsMedian (IQR) HbA1c was 60 (44.0–71.2) mmol/mol (7.6 (6.17–8.66) %) and 62 (45.0–69.0) mmol/mol (7.8 (6.27–8.46) %) for D10 and Quo-Test, respectively, with very good agreement (R2=0.969, P<0.0001). Mean (range) intra- and inter-assay variation was 1.2% (0.0–2.7%) and 1.6% (0.0–2.7%) for the D10 and 3.5% (0.0–6.7%) and 2.7% (0.7–5.1%) for the Quo-Test. Mean change in HbA1c after 28 days storage at −20 °C was −0.7% and +0.3% for D10 and Quo-Test respectively. Compared to the D10, Quo-Test showed 98% agreement for diagnosis of glucose intolerance (IGT and T2DM) and 100% for diagnosis of T2DM.ConclusionGood agreement between the D10 and Quo-Test was seen across a wide HbA1c range. The Quo-Test POCT device provided similar performance to a laboratory based HPLC method.
(POCT) Point Of Care Testing; (HPLC) High Performance Liquid Chromatography; (HbA1c) Glycated Hemoglobin;
Swansea University Medical School