No Cover Image

Journal article 3078 views

"European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?

Jukka Snell

European Law Review, Volume: 33, Issue: 5, Pages: 619 - 642

Swansea University Author: Jukka Snell

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

Abstract

<p>This article investigates and challenges the claims of Majone and Moravcsik that the European Union does not suffer from a democratic deficit due to its powers being limited to efficiency-oriented or  non-salient matters. It is argued that the extent, the exercise, and the impact of EU powe...

Full description

Published in: European Law Review
ISSN: 0307-5400
Published: (2008) 33 European Law Review 2008
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa5073
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T11:51:39Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:31:05Z
id cronfa5073
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2013-10-28T11:12:08.6388246</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>5073</id><entry>2011-10-01</entry><title>"European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1</sid><firstname>Jukka</firstname><surname>Snell</surname><name>Jukka Snell</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2011-10-01</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>&lt;p&gt;This article investigates and challenges the claims of Majone and Moravcsik that the European Union does not suffer from a democratic deficit due to its powers being limited to efficiency-oriented or &#xA0;non-salient matters. It is argued that the extent, the exercise, and the impact of EU powers have expanded dramatically, in line with the objective of establishing an ever-closer union. This dynamic is again evident in the Lisbon Treaty, which largely brings an end to the special status of justice and home affairs policies and renders the Charter of Fundamental Rights binding. It is also argued that the European Court of Justice has failed to curtail significantly the expansion of EU activities and that the new subsidiarity mechanism in the Lisbon Treaty may not prove effective in practice. Further, it is pointed out that there are pressures to create a deeper economic union, environmental union, freedom, security and justice union, and human rights union. If the European Union acts on these pressures, it can be criticised on democratic grounds. If it fails to act, it can be characterised as unresponsive and irrelevant.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>European Law Review</journal><volume>33</volume><journalNumber>5</journalNumber><paginationStart>619</paginationStart><paginationEnd>642</paginationEnd><publisher>(2008) 33 European Law Review</publisher><issnPrint>0307-5400</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>10</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2008</publishedYear><publishedDate>2008-10-01</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2013-10-28T11:12:08.6388246</lastEdited><Created>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Jukka</firstname><surname>Snell</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2013-10-28T11:12:08.6388246 v2 5073 2011-10-01 "European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance? 888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1 Jukka Snell Jukka Snell true false 2011-10-01 LAWD <p>This article investigates and challenges the claims of Majone and Moravcsik that the European Union does not suffer from a democratic deficit due to its powers being limited to efficiency-oriented or  non-salient matters. It is argued that the extent, the exercise, and the impact of EU powers have expanded dramatically, in line with the objective of establishing an ever-closer union. This dynamic is again evident in the Lisbon Treaty, which largely brings an end to the special status of justice and home affairs policies and renders the Charter of Fundamental Rights binding. It is also argued that the European Court of Justice has failed to curtail significantly the expansion of EU activities and that the new subsidiarity mechanism in the Lisbon Treaty may not prove effective in practice. Further, it is pointed out that there are pressures to create a deeper economic union, environmental union, freedom, security and justice union, and human rights union. If the European Union acts on these pressures, it can be criticised on democratic grounds. If it fails to act, it can be characterised as unresponsive and irrelevant.</p> Journal Article European Law Review 33 5 619 642 (2008) 33 European Law Review 0307-5400 1 10 2008 2008-10-01 COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2013-10-28T11:12:08.6388246 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Jukka Snell 1
title "European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?
spellingShingle "European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?
Jukka Snell
title_short "European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?
title_full "European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?
title_fullStr "European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?
title_full_unstemmed "European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?
title_sort "European constitutional settlement", an ever-closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?
author_id_str_mv 888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1
author_id_fullname_str_mv 888cbfaec56853b3709dec388b0948f1_***_Jukka Snell
author Jukka Snell
author2 Jukka Snell
format Journal article
container_title European Law Review
container_volume 33
container_issue 5
container_start_page 619
publishDate 2008
institution Swansea University
issn 0307-5400
publisher (2008) 33 European Law Review
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description <p>This article investigates and challenges the claims of Majone and Moravcsik that the European Union does not suffer from a democratic deficit due to its powers being limited to efficiency-oriented or  non-salient matters. It is argued that the extent, the exercise, and the impact of EU powers have expanded dramatically, in line with the objective of establishing an ever-closer union. This dynamic is again evident in the Lisbon Treaty, which largely brings an end to the special status of justice and home affairs policies and renders the Charter of Fundamental Rights binding. It is also argued that the European Court of Justice has failed to curtail significantly the expansion of EU activities and that the new subsidiarity mechanism in the Lisbon Treaty may not prove effective in practice. Further, it is pointed out that there are pressures to create a deeper economic union, environmental union, freedom, security and justice union, and human rights union. If the European Union acts on these pressures, it can be criticised on democratic grounds. If it fails to act, it can be characterised as unresponsive and irrelevant.</p>
published_date 2008-10-01T03:06:01Z
_version_ 1763749670314573824
score 11.012678

Similar Items