No future in archaeological heritage management?

Högberg, Anders; Holtorf, Cornelius; May, Sarah; Wollentz, Gustav

doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1406398

Journal article 418 views 80 downloads

No future in archaeological heritage management?

Anders Högberg, Cornelius Holtorf, Sarah May

, Gustav Wollentz

World Archaeology, Volume: 49, Issue: 5, Pages: 639 - 647

Swansea University Author: Sarah May

PDF | Version of Record

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Download (1.03MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/00438243.2017.1406398

Abstract

Although the future is mentioned frequently in overarching aims and visions, and it is a major drive in the daily work of archaeological heritage managers and indeed heritage professionals more generally, it remains unclear precisely how an overall commitment to the future can best inform specific h...

Full description

Published in:	World Archaeology
ISSN:	0043-8243 1470-1375
Published:	Taylor and Francis 2017
Online Access:	Check full text
URI:	https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa50932
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

first_indexed	2019-06-25T23:16:21Z
last_indexed	2020-08-13T03:18:32Z
id	cronfa50932
recordtype	SURis
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-08-12T12:37:38.4089235</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>50932</id><entry>2019-06-25</entry><title>No future in archaeological heritage management?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>bdd0aa4f76515ad6e042e52e512f2146</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2740-6727</ORCID><firstname>Sarah</firstname><surname>May</surname><name>Sarah May</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-06-25</date><deptcode>AHIS</deptcode><abstract>Although the future is mentioned frequently in overarching aims and visions, and it is a major drive in the daily work of archaeological heritage managers and indeed heritage professionals more generally, it remains unclear precisely how an overall commitment to the future can best inform specific heritage practices. It seems that most archaeologists and other heritage professionals cannot easily express how they conceive of the future they work for, and how their work will impact on that future. The future tends to remain implicit in daily practice which operates in a continuing, rolling present. The authors argue that this needs to change because present-day heritage management may be much less beneficial for the future than we commonly expect.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>World Archaeology</journal><volume>49</volume><journalNumber>5</journalNumber><paginationStart>639</paginationStart><paginationEnd>647</paginationEnd><publisher>Taylor and Francis</publisher><issnPrint>0043-8243</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1470-1375</issnElectronic><keywords>Archaeological practice, conservation ethos, future consciousness, heritage futures</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/00438243.2017.1406398</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>History</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>AHIS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><degreesponsorsfunders>AHRC</degreesponsorsfunders><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-08-12T12:37:38.4089235</lastEdited><Created>2019-06-25T19:13:12.5786016</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - History</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Anders</firstname><surname>Högberg</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Cornelius</firstname><surname>Holtorf</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Sarah</firstname><surname>May</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2740-6727</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Gustav</firstname><surname>Wollentz</surname><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>50932__14466__de2aaeb29a4d4f40ba1ef43531b28cf6.pdf</filename><originalFilename>50932.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-06-26T13:04:16.8670000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1083209</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling	2020-08-12T12:37:38.4089235 v2 50932 2019-06-25 No future in archaeological heritage management? bdd0aa4f76515ad6e042e52e512f2146 0000-0002-2740-6727 Sarah May Sarah May true false 2019-06-25 AHIS Although the future is mentioned frequently in overarching aims and visions, and it is a major drive in the daily work of archaeological heritage managers and indeed heritage professionals more generally, it remains unclear precisely how an overall commitment to the future can best inform specific heritage practices. It seems that most archaeologists and other heritage professionals cannot easily express how they conceive of the future they work for, and how their work will impact on that future. The future tends to remain implicit in daily practice which operates in a continuing, rolling present. The authors argue that this needs to change because present-day heritage management may be much less beneficial for the future than we commonly expect. Journal Article World Archaeology 49 5 639 647 Taylor and Francis 0043-8243 1470-1375 Archaeological practice, conservation ethos, future consciousness, heritage futures 31 12 2017 2017-12-31 10.1080/00438243.2017.1406398 COLLEGE NANME History COLLEGE CODE AHIS Swansea University AHRC 2020-08-12T12:37:38.4089235 2019-06-25T19:13:12.5786016 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - History Anders Högberg 1 Cornelius Holtorf 2 Sarah May 0000-0002-2740-6727 3 Gustav Wollentz 4 50932__14466__de2aaeb29a4d4f40ba1ef43531b28cf6.pdf 50932.pdf 2019-06-26T13:04:16.8670000 Output 1083209 application/pdf Version of Record true This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title	No future in archaeological heritage management?
spellingShingle	No future in archaeological heritage management? Sarah May
title_short	No future in archaeological heritage management?
title_full	No future in archaeological heritage management?
title_fullStr	No future in archaeological heritage management?
title_full_unstemmed	No future in archaeological heritage management?
title_sort	No future in archaeological heritage management?
author_id_str_mv	bdd0aa4f76515ad6e042e52e512f2146
author_id_fullname_str_mv	bdd0aa4f76515ad6e042e52e512f2146_***_Sarah May
author	Sarah May
author2	Anders Högberg Cornelius Holtorf Sarah May Gustav Wollentz
format	Journal article
container_title	World Archaeology
container_volume	49
container_issue	5
container_start_page	639
publishDate	2017
institution	Swansea University
issn	0043-8243 1470-1375
doi_str_mv	10.1080/00438243.2017.1406398
publisher	Taylor and Francis
college_str	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id	facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str	School of Culture and Communication - History{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - History
document_store_str	1
active_str	0
description	Although the future is mentioned frequently in overarching aims and visions, and it is a major drive in the daily work of archaeological heritage managers and indeed heritage professionals more generally, it remains unclear precisely how an overall commitment to the future can best inform specific heritage practices. It seems that most archaeologists and other heritage professionals cannot easily express how they conceive of the future they work for, and how their work will impact on that future. The future tends to remain implicit in daily practice which operates in a continuing, rolling present. The authors argue that this needs to change because present-day heritage management may be much less beneficial for the future than we commonly expect.
published_date	2017-12-31T04:02:38Z
_version_	1763753232452026368
score	10.998184

No future in archaeological heritage management?

Similar Items