No Cover Image

Journal article 1472 views

The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey

Vishanth Weerakkody, Yogesh Dwivedi Orcid Logo, Zahir Irani

Journal of Information Technology, Volume: 24, Issue: 4, Pages: 354 - 368

Swansea University Author: Yogesh Dwivedi Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1057/jit.2009.16

Abstract

There is a plethora of theories to explore the disciplines of business, management and sociology, with institutional theory being widely used to explore a range of research challenges. In the area of Information Systems (IS), the use of institutional theory remains in its infancy, with much potentia...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Information Technology
ISSN: 0268-3962 1466-4437
Published: SAGE Publications 2009
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa5164
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T11:51:51Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T13:34:45Z
id cronfa5164
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-10-26T16:23:12.0229631</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>5164</id><entry>2011-10-01</entry><title>The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>d154596e71b99ad1285563c8fdd373d7</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5547-9990</ORCID><firstname>Yogesh</firstname><surname>Dwivedi</surname><name>Yogesh Dwivedi</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2011-10-01</date><deptcode>BBU</deptcode><abstract>There is a plethora of theories to explore the disciplines of business, management and sociology, with institutional theory being widely used to explore a range of research challenges. In the area of Information Systems (IS), the use of institutional theory remains in its infancy, with much potential for adoption. Much of the rationale underpinning the proposed research is that a systematic review and synthesis of the normative literature may support the direction of further research and the use of institutional theory in exploring pertinent research challenges facing the IS community. This study also serves to signpost cross-disciplinary research, and thus opens up a whole new research paradigm. Therefore, this article seeks to provide a bibliometric analysis and a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature pertaining to institutional theory to ascertain the current &#x2018;state of play&#x2019; of the theory. Information on a series of variables was extracted after conducting a review of 511 articles across various disciplines that have utilised institutional theory, published in 210 peer-reviewed journals between 1978 and 2008. The findings suggest that the positivist paradigm, empirical and quantitative research, the survey method and organisation/firm as a unit of analysis was used predominantly in combination with institutional theory. The results of this study may have implications for researchers, journal editors, reviewers and universities.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Information Technology</journal><volume>24</volume><journalNumber>4</journalNumber><paginationStart>354</paginationStart><paginationEnd>368</paginationEnd><publisher>SAGE Publications</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0268-3962</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1466-4437</issnElectronic><keywords>institutional theory; institutionalisation; institutionalism; information systems research; bibliometric analysis; longitudinal literature review</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2009</publishedYear><publishedDate>2009-12-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1057/jit.2009.16</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Business</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BBU</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-10-26T16:23:12.0229631</lastEdited><Created>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Business Management</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Vishanth</firstname><surname>Weerakkody</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Yogesh</firstname><surname>Dwivedi</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5547-9990</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Zahir</firstname><surname>Irani</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-10-26T16:23:12.0229631 v2 5164 2011-10-01 The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey d154596e71b99ad1285563c8fdd373d7 0000-0002-5547-9990 Yogesh Dwivedi Yogesh Dwivedi true false 2011-10-01 BBU There is a plethora of theories to explore the disciplines of business, management and sociology, with institutional theory being widely used to explore a range of research challenges. In the area of Information Systems (IS), the use of institutional theory remains in its infancy, with much potential for adoption. Much of the rationale underpinning the proposed research is that a systematic review and synthesis of the normative literature may support the direction of further research and the use of institutional theory in exploring pertinent research challenges facing the IS community. This study also serves to signpost cross-disciplinary research, and thus opens up a whole new research paradigm. Therefore, this article seeks to provide a bibliometric analysis and a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature pertaining to institutional theory to ascertain the current ‘state of play’ of the theory. Information on a series of variables was extracted after conducting a review of 511 articles across various disciplines that have utilised institutional theory, published in 210 peer-reviewed journals between 1978 and 2008. The findings suggest that the positivist paradigm, empirical and quantitative research, the survey method and organisation/firm as a unit of analysis was used predominantly in combination with institutional theory. The results of this study may have implications for researchers, journal editors, reviewers and universities. Journal Article Journal of Information Technology 24 4 354 368 SAGE Publications 0268-3962 1466-4437 institutional theory; institutionalisation; institutionalism; information systems research; bibliometric analysis; longitudinal literature review 1 12 2009 2009-12-01 10.1057/jit.2009.16 COLLEGE NANME Business COLLEGE CODE BBU Swansea University 2022-10-26T16:23:12.0229631 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Business Management Vishanth Weerakkody 1 Yogesh Dwivedi 0000-0002-5547-9990 2 Zahir Irani 3
title The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey
spellingShingle The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey
Yogesh Dwivedi
title_short The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey
title_full The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey
title_fullStr The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey
title_full_unstemmed The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey
title_sort The Diffusion and Use of Institutional Theory: A Cross-Disciplinary Longitudinal Literature Survey
author_id_str_mv d154596e71b99ad1285563c8fdd373d7
author_id_fullname_str_mv d154596e71b99ad1285563c8fdd373d7_***_Yogesh Dwivedi
author Yogesh Dwivedi
author2 Vishanth Weerakkody
Yogesh Dwivedi
Zahir Irani
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Information Technology
container_volume 24
container_issue 4
container_start_page 354
publishDate 2009
institution Swansea University
issn 0268-3962
1466-4437
doi_str_mv 10.1057/jit.2009.16
publisher SAGE Publications
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Management - Business Management{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Business Management
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description There is a plethora of theories to explore the disciplines of business, management and sociology, with institutional theory being widely used to explore a range of research challenges. In the area of Information Systems (IS), the use of institutional theory remains in its infancy, with much potential for adoption. Much of the rationale underpinning the proposed research is that a systematic review and synthesis of the normative literature may support the direction of further research and the use of institutional theory in exploring pertinent research challenges facing the IS community. This study also serves to signpost cross-disciplinary research, and thus opens up a whole new research paradigm. Therefore, this article seeks to provide a bibliometric analysis and a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature pertaining to institutional theory to ascertain the current ‘state of play’ of the theory. Information on a series of variables was extracted after conducting a review of 511 articles across various disciplines that have utilised institutional theory, published in 210 peer-reviewed journals between 1978 and 2008. The findings suggest that the positivist paradigm, empirical and quantitative research, the survey method and organisation/firm as a unit of analysis was used predominantly in combination with institutional theory. The results of this study may have implications for researchers, journal editors, reviewers and universities.
published_date 2009-12-01T03:06:08Z
_version_ 1763749678106542080
score 11.017797