No Cover Image

Journal article 653 views

After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies’

C Rhodes, Carl Rhodes

Organization Studies, Volume: 30, Issue: 6, Pages: 654 - 672

Swansea University Author: Carl Rhodes

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.1177/0170840609104804

Abstract

<p id="p-1">Building on existing considerations of reflexivity in research writing, this essai seeks to reappraise the concept of responsibility in relation to the ethics of post-representational research methodology in organization studies. Jacques Derrida's discussions of resp...

Full description

Published in: Organization Studies
Published: Sage 2010
Online Access: http://oss.sagepub.com/content/30/6/653.short
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa5215
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T11:51:59Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:31:20Z
id cronfa5215
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>5215</id><entry>2011-10-01</entry><title>After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies&#x2019;</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>6323f8c559e113b1ead52a0e6bb00043</sid><firstname>Carl</firstname><surname>Rhodes</surname><name>Carl Rhodes</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2011-10-01</date><abstract>&lt;p id="p-1"&gt;Building on existing considerations of reflexivity in research writing, this essai seeks to reappraise the concept of responsibility in relation to the ethics of post-representational research methodology in organization studies. Jacques Derrida's discussions of responsibility and undecidability and Emmanuel L&amp;eacute;vinas' distinction between the &lt;em&gt;saying&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;said&lt;/em&gt; are brought to bear on the ethics of the discursive construction of organizational research as a form of representing the Other. The essai argues that responding to reflexivity extends beyond textual practice and self-accounting towards a responsibility for the exercise of academic freedom. This freedom entails a radical openness that is operationalized in an ongoing reinvention that resists the institutionalization of the field of inquiry through a form of transformative knowledge. It is the legacy and promise of reflexivity in organization studies that can invigorate the imagination in research &amp;mdash; its poiesis &amp;mdash; as an ongoing project of saying the ethical.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Organization Studies</journal><volume>30</volume><journalNumber>6</journalNumber><paginationStart>654</paginationStart><paginationEnd>672</paginationEnd><publisher>Sage</publisher><placeOfPublication/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2010</publishedYear><publishedDate>2010-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1177/0170840609104804</doi><url>http://oss.sagepub.com/content/30/6/653.short</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</lastEdited><Created>2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Business Management</level></path><authors><author><firstname>C</firstname><surname>Rhodes</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Carl</firstname><surname>Rhodes</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 v2 5215 2011-10-01 After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies’ 6323f8c559e113b1ead52a0e6bb00043 Carl Rhodes Carl Rhodes true false 2011-10-01 <p id="p-1">Building on existing considerations of reflexivity in research writing, this essai seeks to reappraise the concept of responsibility in relation to the ethics of post-representational research methodology in organization studies. Jacques Derrida's discussions of responsibility and undecidability and Emmanuel L&eacute;vinas' distinction between the <em>saying</em> and the <em>said</em> are brought to bear on the ethics of the discursive construction of organizational research as a form of representing the Other. The essai argues that responding to reflexivity extends beyond textual practice and self-accounting towards a responsibility for the exercise of academic freedom. This freedom entails a radical openness that is operationalized in an ongoing reinvention that resists the institutionalization of the field of inquiry through a form of transformative knowledge. It is the legacy and promise of reflexivity in organization studies that can invigorate the imagination in research &mdash; its poiesis &mdash; as an ongoing project of saying the ethical.</p> Journal Article Organization Studies 30 6 654 672 Sage 31 12 2010 2010-12-31 10.1177/0170840609104804 http://oss.sagepub.com/content/30/6/653.short COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 2011-10-01T00:00:00.0000000 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Business Management C Rhodes 1 Carl Rhodes 2
title After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies’
spellingShingle After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies’
Carl Rhodes
title_short After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies’
title_full After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies’
title_fullStr After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies’
title_full_unstemmed After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies’
title_sort After Reflexivity: Ethics and the Writing of Organization Studies’
author_id_str_mv 6323f8c559e113b1ead52a0e6bb00043
author_id_fullname_str_mv 6323f8c559e113b1ead52a0e6bb00043_***_Carl Rhodes
author Carl Rhodes
author2 C Rhodes
Carl Rhodes
format Journal article
container_title Organization Studies
container_volume 30
container_issue 6
container_start_page 654
publishDate 2010
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0170840609104804
publisher Sage
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Management - Business Management{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Business Management
url http://oss.sagepub.com/content/30/6/653.short
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description <p id="p-1">Building on existing considerations of reflexivity in research writing, this essai seeks to reappraise the concept of responsibility in relation to the ethics of post-representational research methodology in organization studies. Jacques Derrida's discussions of responsibility and undecidability and Emmanuel L&eacute;vinas' distinction between the <em>saying</em> and the <em>said</em> are brought to bear on the ethics of the discursive construction of organizational research as a form of representing the Other. The essai argues that responding to reflexivity extends beyond textual practice and self-accounting towards a responsibility for the exercise of academic freedom. This freedom entails a radical openness that is operationalized in an ongoing reinvention that resists the institutionalization of the field of inquiry through a form of transformative knowledge. It is the legacy and promise of reflexivity in organization studies that can invigorate the imagination in research &mdash; its poiesis &mdash; as an ongoing project of saying the ethical.</p>
published_date 2010-12-31T03:06:13Z
_version_ 1763749683548651520
score 10.998797

Similar Items