No Cover Image

Journal article 735 views 164 downloads

Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power

Christian Vassallo, Christian Vassallo, Adrian Gray, Cloe Cummins, Aron Murphy, Mark Waldron Orcid Logo

European Journal of Applied Physiology, Volume: 120, Issue: 1, Pages: 219 - 230

Swansea University Authors: Christian Vassallo, Mark Waldron Orcid Logo

  • 52701.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY).

    Download (1.3MB)

Abstract

PurposeWe compared a new locomotor-specific model to track the expenditure and reconstitution of work done above critical power (W´) and balance of W´ (W´BAL) by modelling flat over-ground power during exhaustive intermittent running.MethodNine male participants completed a ramp test, 3-min all-out...

Full description

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology
ISSN: 1439-6319 1439-6327
Published: 2020
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa52701
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2019-11-11T13:15:49Z
last_indexed 2021-01-15T04:16:21Z
id cronfa52701
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-01-14T13:49:00.9393007</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>52701</id><entry>2019-11-11</entry><title>Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>c2da7aec85a96def9b60d5af0afb22fe</sid><firstname>Christian</firstname><surname>Vassallo</surname><name>Christian Vassallo</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2720-4615</ORCID><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Waldron</surname><name>Mark Waldron</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-11-11</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>PurposeWe compared a new locomotor-specific model to track the expenditure and reconstitution of work done above critical power (W&#xB4;) and balance of W&#xB4; (W&#xB4;BAL) by modelling flat over-ground power during exhaustive intermittent running.MethodNine male participants completed a ramp test, 3-min all-out test and the 30&#x2013;15 intermittent fitness test (30&#x2013;15 IFT), and performed a severe-intensity constant work-rate trial (SCWR) at the maximum oxygen uptake velocity (vV&#x307;O2max). Four intermittent trials followed: 60-s at vV&#x307;O2max&#x2009;+&#x2009;50% &#x394;1 (&#x394;1&#x2009;=&#x2009;vV&#x307;O2max &#x2212; critical velocity [VCrit]) interspersed by 30-s in light (SL; 40% vV&#x307;O2max), moderate (SM; 90% gas-exchange threshold velocity [VGET]), heavy (SH; VGET&#x2009;+&#x2009;50% &#x394;2 [&#x394;2&#x2009;=&#x2009;VCrit &#x2212; VGET]), or severe (SS; vV&#x307;O2max &#x2212;&#x2009;50% &#x394;1) domains. Data from Global Positioning Systems were derived to model over-ground power. The difference between critical and recovery power (DCP), time constant for reconstitution of W&#xB4; (&#x3C4;W&#x2032;), time to limit of tolerance (TLIM), and W&#xB4;BAL from the integral (W&#xB4;BALint), differential (W&#xB4;BALdiff), and locomotor-specific (OG-W&#xB4;BAL) methods were compared.ResultsThe relationship between &#x3C4;W&#x2032; and DCP was exponential (r2&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.52). The &#x3C4;W&#x2032; for SL, SM, and SH trials were 119&#x2009;&#xB1;&#x2009;32-s, 190&#x2009;&#xB1;&#x2009;45-s, and 336&#x2009;&#xB1;&#x2009;77-s, respectively. Actual TLIM in the 30&#x2013;15 IFT (968&#x2009;&#xB1;&#x2009;117-s) compared closely to TLIM predicted by OG-W&#xB4;BAL (929&#x2009;&#xB1;&#x2009;94-s, P&#x2009;&gt;&#x2009;0.100) and W&#xB4;BALdiff (938&#x2009;&#xB1;&#x2009;84-s, P&#x2009;&gt;&#x2009;0.100) but not to W&#xB4;BALint (848&#x2009;&#xB1;&#x2009;91-s, P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001).ConclusionThe OG-W&#xB4;BAL accurately tracked W&#xB4; kinetics during intermittent running to exhaustion on flat surfaces.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>European Journal of Applied Physiology</journal><volume>120</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>219</paginationStart><paginationEnd>230</paginationEnd><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1439-6319</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1439-6327</issnElectronic><keywords>Critical power; Exercise tolerance; Mechanical modelling; Over-ground power</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2020</publishedYear><publishedDate>2020-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1007/s00421-019-04266-8</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-01-14T13:49:00.9393007</lastEdited><Created>2019-11-11T11:11:44.4717174</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Christian</firstname><surname>Vassallo</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Christian</firstname><surname>Vassallo</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Adrian</firstname><surname>Gray</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Cloe</firstname><surname>Cummins</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Aron</firstname><surname>Murphy</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Waldron</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2720-4615</orcid><order>6</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>52701__16077__0bca7cd8211543a3888bc73be3e1713b.pdf</filename><originalFilename>52701.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-12-11T11:32:06.5881861</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1359573</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2021-01-14T13:49:00.9393007 v2 52701 2019-11-11 Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power c2da7aec85a96def9b60d5af0afb22fe Christian Vassallo Christian Vassallo true false 70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa 0000-0002-2720-4615 Mark Waldron Mark Waldron true false 2019-11-11 STSC PurposeWe compared a new locomotor-specific model to track the expenditure and reconstitution of work done above critical power (W´) and balance of W´ (W´BAL) by modelling flat over-ground power during exhaustive intermittent running.MethodNine male participants completed a ramp test, 3-min all-out test and the 30–15 intermittent fitness test (30–15 IFT), and performed a severe-intensity constant work-rate trial (SCWR) at the maximum oxygen uptake velocity (vV̇O2max). Four intermittent trials followed: 60-s at vV̇O2max + 50% Δ1 (Δ1 = vV̇O2max − critical velocity [VCrit]) interspersed by 30-s in light (SL; 40% vV̇O2max), moderate (SM; 90% gas-exchange threshold velocity [VGET]), heavy (SH; VGET + 50% Δ2 [Δ2 = VCrit − VGET]), or severe (SS; vV̇O2max − 50% Δ1) domains. Data from Global Positioning Systems were derived to model over-ground power. The difference between critical and recovery power (DCP), time constant for reconstitution of W´ (τW′), time to limit of tolerance (TLIM), and W´BAL from the integral (W´BALint), differential (W´BALdiff), and locomotor-specific (OG-W´BAL) methods were compared.ResultsThe relationship between τW′ and DCP was exponential (r2 = 0.52). The τW′ for SL, SM, and SH trials were 119 ± 32-s, 190 ± 45-s, and 336 ± 77-s, respectively. Actual TLIM in the 30–15 IFT (968 ± 117-s) compared closely to TLIM predicted by OG-W´BAL (929 ± 94-s, P > 0.100) and W´BALdiff (938 ± 84-s, P > 0.100) but not to W´BALint (848 ± 91-s, P = 0.001).ConclusionThe OG-W´BAL accurately tracked W´ kinetics during intermittent running to exhaustion on flat surfaces. Journal Article European Journal of Applied Physiology 120 1 219 230 1439-6319 1439-6327 Critical power; Exercise tolerance; Mechanical modelling; Over-ground power 1 1 2020 2020-01-01 10.1007/s00421-019-04266-8 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University 2021-01-14T13:49:00.9393007 2019-11-11T11:11:44.4717174 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Christian Vassallo 1 Christian Vassallo 2 Adrian Gray 3 Cloe Cummins 4 Aron Murphy 5 Mark Waldron 0000-0002-2720-4615 6 52701__16077__0bca7cd8211543a3888bc73be3e1713b.pdf 52701.pdf 2019-12-11T11:32:06.5881861 Output 1359573 application/pdf Version of Record true Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY). true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power
spellingShingle Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power
Christian Vassallo
Mark Waldron
title_short Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power
title_full Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power
title_fullStr Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power
title_full_unstemmed Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power
title_sort Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution kinetics of work done above critical power
author_id_str_mv c2da7aec85a96def9b60d5af0afb22fe
70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa
author_id_fullname_str_mv c2da7aec85a96def9b60d5af0afb22fe_***_Christian Vassallo
70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa_***_Mark Waldron
author Christian Vassallo
Mark Waldron
author2 Christian Vassallo
Christian Vassallo
Adrian Gray
Cloe Cummins
Aron Murphy
Mark Waldron
format Journal article
container_title European Journal of Applied Physiology
container_volume 120
container_issue 1
container_start_page 219
publishDate 2020
institution Swansea University
issn 1439-6319
1439-6327
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00421-019-04266-8
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description PurposeWe compared a new locomotor-specific model to track the expenditure and reconstitution of work done above critical power (W´) and balance of W´ (W´BAL) by modelling flat over-ground power during exhaustive intermittent running.MethodNine male participants completed a ramp test, 3-min all-out test and the 30–15 intermittent fitness test (30–15 IFT), and performed a severe-intensity constant work-rate trial (SCWR) at the maximum oxygen uptake velocity (vV̇O2max). Four intermittent trials followed: 60-s at vV̇O2max + 50% Δ1 (Δ1 = vV̇O2max − critical velocity [VCrit]) interspersed by 30-s in light (SL; 40% vV̇O2max), moderate (SM; 90% gas-exchange threshold velocity [VGET]), heavy (SH; VGET + 50% Δ2 [Δ2 = VCrit − VGET]), or severe (SS; vV̇O2max − 50% Δ1) domains. Data from Global Positioning Systems were derived to model over-ground power. The difference between critical and recovery power (DCP), time constant for reconstitution of W´ (τW′), time to limit of tolerance (TLIM), and W´BAL from the integral (W´BALint), differential (W´BALdiff), and locomotor-specific (OG-W´BAL) methods were compared.ResultsThe relationship between τW′ and DCP was exponential (r2 = 0.52). The τW′ for SL, SM, and SH trials were 119 ± 32-s, 190 ± 45-s, and 336 ± 77-s, respectively. Actual TLIM in the 30–15 IFT (968 ± 117-s) compared closely to TLIM predicted by OG-W´BAL (929 ± 94-s, P > 0.100) and W´BALdiff (938 ± 84-s, P > 0.100) but not to W´BALint (848 ± 91-s, P = 0.001).ConclusionThe OG-W´BAL accurately tracked W´ kinetics during intermittent running to exhaustion on flat surfaces.
published_date 2020-01-01T04:05:13Z
_version_ 1763753395569557504
score 11.035634