Journal article 923 views
Periodic electrolysis technique for in situ fouling control and removal with low-pressure membrane filtration
,
Ben Clifford ,
David Gethin ,
Paolo Bertoncello ,
Raed Hashaikeh,
Nidal Hilal
Desalination, Volume: 433, Pages: 10 - 24
Swansea University Authors:
Hadeel Abid, Daniel Johnson , Ben Clifford , David Gethin , Paolo Bertoncello , Nidal Hilal
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.019
Abstract
Electrically conductive membranes and their application for desalination pre-treatment and water purification have an exceptional performance due to self-cleaning of fouling deposits by the application of external electric fields. However, the effectiveness of existing conductive membranes is hamper...
| Published in: | Desalination |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0011-9164 |
| Published: |
Elsevier BV
2018
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa53289 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
Electrically conductive membranes and their application for desalination pre-treatment and water purification have an exceptional performance due to self-cleaning of fouling deposits by the application of external electric fields. However, the effectiveness of existing conductive membranes is hampered by their common applications. The current approach aims to better understand the in situ fouling mitigation and enhanced flux by employing two different electrically conductive coated feed spacer configurations during filtration of humic acid at concentrations of 8, 12, 16 and 20 ppm. Periodic electrolysis was applied for a duration of 2 min with three intervals of 30, 45 and 60 min. A comparison of both the feed spacers was made in terms of the effect of the applied potential and interval time on enhancement of water flux, as well as the required energy consumption at four different concentrations. In terms of enhanced flux and energy consumption, feed spacer A (2 × 2 mm aperture size) revealed better results than feed spacer B (3 × 2 mm), which may be attributed to a greater conductive area. The reported technique shows a major advantage of in situ feed spacer self-cleaning, thus providing a continuous and non-destructive approach for the mitigation of surface fouling. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Pre-treatment, NOM, Electrically conductive coated feed spacer, Water treatment |
| Start Page: |
10 |
| End Page: |
24 |