No Cover Image

Journal article 549 views 52 downloads

Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels

Caroline Jones Orcid Logo, Jonathan Montgomery

Journal of Law and Society, Volume: 47, Issue: 3

Swansea University Author: Caroline Jones Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1111/jols.12237

Abstract

This article focuses on a pilot project concerning the uses of case biography methods for socio-legal studies in health care law. Drawing on ‘paths to justice’ studies, network analysis and legal archaeology, we develop a case study of AC v Berkshire West Primary Care Trust. This approach led us to...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Law and Society
ISSN: 0263-323X 1467-6478
Published: Wiley 2020
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa53744
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2020-06-22T19:06:23Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T14:31:27Z
id cronfa53744
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-11-30T10:47:54.0292747</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>53744</id><entry>2020-03-05</entry><title>Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8201817d55a832f7c23f406402904a2b</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-7632-9468</ORCID><firstname>Caroline</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><name>Caroline Jones</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-03-05</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>This article focuses on a pilot project concerning the uses of case biography methods for socio-legal studies in health care law. Drawing on &#x2018;paths to justice&#x2019; studies, network analysis and legal archaeology, we develop a case study of AC v Berkshire West Primary Care Trust. This approach led us to a feature commonly overlooked in legal literature, concerning the way in which the judicial determination of a case involves suppressing one or more possible narrative constructions of the dispute in favour of another/others. Our case biography analysis explores how competing narratives can be traced not only through legal argument and literature, but also through the personnel involved, in ways that are obscured by formal records. Paying attention to biographical features leads to a richer understanding of cases, including the importance of pre- and post- judicial decision-making aspects.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Law and Society</journal><volume>47</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Wiley</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0263-323X</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1467-6478</issnElectronic><keywords>case biography, methodology, socio-legal, narrative, paths to justice, network analysis, legal archaeology, NHS rationing, transgender</keywords><publishedDay>18</publishedDay><publishedMonth>8</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2020</publishedYear><publishedDate>2020-08-18</publishedDate><doi>10.1111/jols.12237</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-11-30T10:47:54.0292747</lastEdited><Created>2020-03-05T17:25:45.2697688</Created><path><level id="1">Professional Services</level><level id="2">ISS - Uncategorised</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Caroline</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7632-9468</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Jonathan</firstname><surname>Montgomery</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>53744__16836__b6c613ed73d44c96baa917770fdce42f.pdf</filename><originalFilename>53744.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-03-12T11:43:19.8761213</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>561418</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2021-01-15T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-11-30T10:47:54.0292747 v2 53744 2020-03-05 Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels 8201817d55a832f7c23f406402904a2b 0000-0001-7632-9468 Caroline Jones Caroline Jones true false 2020-03-05 LAWD This article focuses on a pilot project concerning the uses of case biography methods for socio-legal studies in health care law. Drawing on ‘paths to justice’ studies, network analysis and legal archaeology, we develop a case study of AC v Berkshire West Primary Care Trust. This approach led us to a feature commonly overlooked in legal literature, concerning the way in which the judicial determination of a case involves suppressing one or more possible narrative constructions of the dispute in favour of another/others. Our case biography analysis explores how competing narratives can be traced not only through legal argument and literature, but also through the personnel involved, in ways that are obscured by formal records. Paying attention to biographical features leads to a richer understanding of cases, including the importance of pre- and post- judicial decision-making aspects. Journal Article Journal of Law and Society 47 3 Wiley 0263-323X 1467-6478 case biography, methodology, socio-legal, narrative, paths to justice, network analysis, legal archaeology, NHS rationing, transgender 18 8 2020 2020-08-18 10.1111/jols.12237 COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2022-11-30T10:47:54.0292747 2020-03-05T17:25:45.2697688 Professional Services ISS - Uncategorised Caroline Jones 0000-0001-7632-9468 1 Jonathan Montgomery 2 53744__16836__b6c613ed73d44c96baa917770fdce42f.pdf 53744.pdf 2020-03-12T11:43:19.8761213 Output 561418 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2021-01-15T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels
spellingShingle Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels
Caroline Jones
title_short Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels
title_full Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels
title_fullStr Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels
title_full_unstemmed Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels
title_sort Competing Narratives in a Case Biography: A Tale of Two Citadels
author_id_str_mv 8201817d55a832f7c23f406402904a2b
author_id_fullname_str_mv 8201817d55a832f7c23f406402904a2b_***_Caroline Jones
author Caroline Jones
author2 Caroline Jones
Jonathan Montgomery
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Law and Society
container_volume 47
container_issue 3
publishDate 2020
institution Swansea University
issn 0263-323X
1467-6478
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jols.12237
publisher Wiley
college_str Professional Services
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id professionalservices
hierarchy_top_title Professional Services
hierarchy_parent_id professionalservices
hierarchy_parent_title Professional Services
department_str ISS - Uncategorised{{{_:::_}}}Professional Services{{{_:::_}}}ISS - Uncategorised
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description This article focuses on a pilot project concerning the uses of case biography methods for socio-legal studies in health care law. Drawing on ‘paths to justice’ studies, network analysis and legal archaeology, we develop a case study of AC v Berkshire West Primary Care Trust. This approach led us to a feature commonly overlooked in legal literature, concerning the way in which the judicial determination of a case involves suppressing one or more possible narrative constructions of the dispute in favour of another/others. Our case biography analysis explores how competing narratives can be traced not only through legal argument and literature, but also through the personnel involved, in ways that are obscured by formal records. Paying attention to biographical features leads to a richer understanding of cases, including the importance of pre- and post- judicial decision-making aspects.
published_date 2020-08-18T04:06:51Z
_version_ 1763753498343636992
score 11.012678

Similar Items