No Cover Image

E-Thesis 408 views 403 downloads

French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013 / JAMIE LEMON

Swansea University Author: JAMIE LEMON

DOI (Published version): 10.23889/Suthesis.53836

Abstract

Using Ruth Wodak’s Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) of Critical Discourse Analysis, this thesis examines the ways in which French Republican ideas were synthesised with arguments relating to the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine in 2011 and 2013 to justify military intervention and international...

Full description

Published: Swansea 2020
Institution: Swansea University
Degree level: Doctoral
Degree name: Ph.D
Supervisor: Bideleux, Robert ; Clarke, Gerard
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa53836
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2020-03-19T19:46:11Z
last_indexed 2020-09-17T03:17:17Z
id cronfa53836
recordtype RisThesis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-03-19T13:29:58.5954778</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>53836</id><entry>2020-03-19</entry><title>French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>e1b385edf3aec176f31bbfe903a020c9</sid><firstname>JAMIE</firstname><surname>LEMON</surname><name>JAMIE LEMON</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-03-19</date><abstract>Using Ruth Wodak&#x2019;s Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) of Critical Discourse Analysis, this thesis examines the ways in which French Republican ideas were synthesised with arguments relating to the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine in 2011 and 2013 to justify military intervention and international cooperation. Firstly, Nicolas Sarkozy had learned his lesson with Tunisia that the Arab Spring was more than just a minor wave of protests. Therefore, when the uprising began in Libya, Sarkozy relied on the Republican ideas of the universality of Liberty, Equality, and Human Rights. This was pitched perfectly to justify a military intervention along the lines of the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, co-opting the support of the United States and the United Kingdom into the mission, as well as gaining the tacit approval of Russia. However Hollande, when approaching a similar situation in Syria, relied on a different side of the Republican ethos. In seeking to &#x201C;punish&#x201D; Syria rather than protect its citizens, Hollande fell succumbed to the more paternalistic trappings of French Republicanism, indulging in a more naked display of grandeur, designating France as a gendarme of the world. Ultimately, this was an inappropriate tactic to adopt. Hollande&#x2019;s administration would antagonise Russia and misread the American intentions. This would lead to further embarrassment when events overtook President Hollande, and the United States and Russia organised their own agreement to deal with Syria&#x2019;s chemical weapons.</abstract><type>E-Thesis</type><journal/><publisher/><placeOfPublication>Swansea</placeOfPublication><keywords>France, French Republicanism, Libya, Syria, Arab Spring, Responsibility to Protect, Military Intervention, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse Historical Approach, Nicolas Sarkozy, Fran&#xE7;ois Hollande</keywords><publishedDay>12</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2020</publishedYear><publishedDate>2020-02-12</publishedDate><doi>10.23889/Suthesis.53836</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><supervisor>Bideleux, Robert ; Clarke, Gerard</supervisor><degreelevel>Doctoral</degreelevel><degreename>Ph.D</degreename><degreesponsorsfunders>ESRC</degreesponsorsfunders><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-03-19T13:29:58.5954778</lastEdited><Created>2020-03-19T13:29:58.5954778</Created><authors><author><firstname>JAMIE</firstname><surname>LEMON</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>53836__16876__0b1cdddef55e4f019ea0a47ea33ef9e0.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Lemon_ Jamie_J_PhD_Thesis_Final.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-03-19T15:33:26.9184854</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>3245319</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>E-Thesis &#x2013; open access</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2020-03-19T13:29:58.5954778 v2 53836 2020-03-19 French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013 e1b385edf3aec176f31bbfe903a020c9 JAMIE LEMON JAMIE LEMON true false 2020-03-19 Using Ruth Wodak’s Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) of Critical Discourse Analysis, this thesis examines the ways in which French Republican ideas were synthesised with arguments relating to the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine in 2011 and 2013 to justify military intervention and international cooperation. Firstly, Nicolas Sarkozy had learned his lesson with Tunisia that the Arab Spring was more than just a minor wave of protests. Therefore, when the uprising began in Libya, Sarkozy relied on the Republican ideas of the universality of Liberty, Equality, and Human Rights. This was pitched perfectly to justify a military intervention along the lines of the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, co-opting the support of the United States and the United Kingdom into the mission, as well as gaining the tacit approval of Russia. However Hollande, when approaching a similar situation in Syria, relied on a different side of the Republican ethos. In seeking to “punish” Syria rather than protect its citizens, Hollande fell succumbed to the more paternalistic trappings of French Republicanism, indulging in a more naked display of grandeur, designating France as a gendarme of the world. Ultimately, this was an inappropriate tactic to adopt. Hollande’s administration would antagonise Russia and misread the American intentions. This would lead to further embarrassment when events overtook President Hollande, and the United States and Russia organised their own agreement to deal with Syria’s chemical weapons. E-Thesis Swansea France, French Republicanism, Libya, Syria, Arab Spring, Responsibility to Protect, Military Intervention, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse Historical Approach, Nicolas Sarkozy, François Hollande 12 2 2020 2020-02-12 10.23889/Suthesis.53836 COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University Bideleux, Robert ; Clarke, Gerard Doctoral Ph.D ESRC 2020-03-19T13:29:58.5954778 2020-03-19T13:29:58.5954778 JAMIE LEMON 1 53836__16876__0b1cdddef55e4f019ea0a47ea33ef9e0.pdf Lemon_ Jamie_J_PhD_Thesis_Final.pdf 2020-03-19T15:33:26.9184854 Output 3245319 application/pdf E-Thesis – open access true true eng
title French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013
spellingShingle French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013
JAMIE LEMON
title_short French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013
title_full French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013
title_fullStr French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013
title_full_unstemmed French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013
title_sort French Republicanism: A Comparative Analysis of the French Military Interventions in Libya in 2011 and in Syria in 2013
author_id_str_mv e1b385edf3aec176f31bbfe903a020c9
author_id_fullname_str_mv e1b385edf3aec176f31bbfe903a020c9_***_JAMIE LEMON
author JAMIE LEMON
author2 JAMIE LEMON
format E-Thesis
publishDate 2020
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.23889/Suthesis.53836
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Using Ruth Wodak’s Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) of Critical Discourse Analysis, this thesis examines the ways in which French Republican ideas were synthesised with arguments relating to the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine in 2011 and 2013 to justify military intervention and international cooperation. Firstly, Nicolas Sarkozy had learned his lesson with Tunisia that the Arab Spring was more than just a minor wave of protests. Therefore, when the uprising began in Libya, Sarkozy relied on the Republican ideas of the universality of Liberty, Equality, and Human Rights. This was pitched perfectly to justify a military intervention along the lines of the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, co-opting the support of the United States and the United Kingdom into the mission, as well as gaining the tacit approval of Russia. However Hollande, when approaching a similar situation in Syria, relied on a different side of the Republican ethos. In seeking to “punish” Syria rather than protect its citizens, Hollande fell succumbed to the more paternalistic trappings of French Republicanism, indulging in a more naked display of grandeur, designating France as a gendarme of the world. Ultimately, this was an inappropriate tactic to adopt. Hollande’s administration would antagonise Russia and misread the American intentions. This would lead to further embarrassment when events overtook President Hollande, and the United States and Russia organised their own agreement to deal with Syria’s chemical weapons.
published_date 2020-02-12T04:07:00Z
_version_ 1763753507640311808
score 11.012678

Similar Items