Journal article 730 views 109 downloads
Doping and Moral Disapprovals
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 331 - 348
Swansea University Author: Andrew Bloodworth
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Download (965.77KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/17511321.2020.1762717
Abstract
This paper explores variance in how people morally disapprove wrongs related to doping. The variance may pertain to what type of moral disapproval a person uses or to what they disapprove of. Our exploration is both conceptual and empirical. Conceptually, we distinguish between four types of moral d...
Published in: | Sport, Ethics and Philosophy |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1751-1321 1751-133X |
Published: |
Informa UK Limited
2021
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa54081 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2020-04-29T13:22:32Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-01-11T14:31:57Z |
id |
cronfa54081 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-11-02T13:21:49.4062939</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>54081</id><entry>2020-04-29</entry><title>Doping and Moral Disapprovals</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-4601-442X</ORCID><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Bloodworth</surname><name>Andrew Bloodworth</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-04-29</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>This paper explores variance in how people morally disapprove wrongs related to doping. The variance may pertain to what type of moral disapproval a person uses or to what they disapprove of. Our exploration is both conceptual and empirical. Conceptually, we distinguish between four types of moral disapprovals that we call blame, judging blameworthy, condemnation and sadness. We elaborate these four moral phenomena through a conceptual scheme that we call the matrix of moral disapprovals. The matrix is the central conceptual innovation of our paper. It depicts how the four moral disapprovals relate to each other and characterises their typical instances. In the empirical part of the paper, we use the matrix of moral disapproval to examine how decision-makers in Finnish elite sport organisations talk about doping. The empirical examination is based on 31 interviews with decision-makers from Finnish elite sport organisations. Although we distinguish between the conceptual and empirical approaches in our paper, they are not fully separate, but support and inform each other.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Sport, Ethics and Philosophy</journal><volume>15</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>331</paginationStart><paginationEnd>348</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1751-1321</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1751-133X</issnElectronic><keywords>blame, condemnation, doping, moral philosophy, sadness</keywords><publishedDay>3</publishedDay><publishedMonth>7</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-07-03</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/17511321.2020.1762717</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-11-02T13:21:49.4062939</lastEdited><Created>2020-04-29T08:46:03.7498247</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Mika</firstname><surname>Hämäläinen</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Bloodworth</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4601-442X</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Suvi</firstname><surname>Heikkinen</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>54081__17148__bb85333ac9f2439c896ebe2390af96a2.pdf</filename><originalFilename>54081.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-04-29T08:48:41.3458038</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>988951</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2021-11-13T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2022-11-02T13:21:49.4062939 v2 54081 2020-04-29 Doping and Moral Disapprovals 3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889 0000-0002-4601-442X Andrew Bloodworth Andrew Bloodworth true false 2020-04-29 STSC This paper explores variance in how people morally disapprove wrongs related to doping. The variance may pertain to what type of moral disapproval a person uses or to what they disapprove of. Our exploration is both conceptual and empirical. Conceptually, we distinguish between four types of moral disapprovals that we call blame, judging blameworthy, condemnation and sadness. We elaborate these four moral phenomena through a conceptual scheme that we call the matrix of moral disapprovals. The matrix is the central conceptual innovation of our paper. It depicts how the four moral disapprovals relate to each other and characterises their typical instances. In the empirical part of the paper, we use the matrix of moral disapproval to examine how decision-makers in Finnish elite sport organisations talk about doping. The empirical examination is based on 31 interviews with decision-makers from Finnish elite sport organisations. Although we distinguish between the conceptual and empirical approaches in our paper, they are not fully separate, but support and inform each other. Journal Article Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 3 331 348 Informa UK Limited 1751-1321 1751-133X blame, condemnation, doping, moral philosophy, sadness 3 7 2021 2021-07-03 10.1080/17511321.2020.1762717 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University 2022-11-02T13:21:49.4062939 2020-04-29T08:46:03.7498247 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Mika Hämäläinen 1 Andrew Bloodworth 0000-0002-4601-442X 2 Suvi Heikkinen 3 54081__17148__bb85333ac9f2439c896ebe2390af96a2.pdf 54081.pdf 2020-04-29T08:48:41.3458038 Output 988951 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2021-11-13T00:00:00.0000000 true eng |
title |
Doping and Moral Disapprovals |
spellingShingle |
Doping and Moral Disapprovals Andrew Bloodworth |
title_short |
Doping and Moral Disapprovals |
title_full |
Doping and Moral Disapprovals |
title_fullStr |
Doping and Moral Disapprovals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Doping and Moral Disapprovals |
title_sort |
Doping and Moral Disapprovals |
author_id_str_mv |
3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889_***_Andrew Bloodworth |
author |
Andrew Bloodworth |
author2 |
Mika Hämäläinen Andrew Bloodworth Suvi Heikkinen |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy |
container_volume |
15 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
331 |
publishDate |
2021 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1751-1321 1751-133X |
doi_str_mv |
10.1080/17511321.2020.1762717 |
publisher |
Informa UK Limited |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This paper explores variance in how people morally disapprove wrongs related to doping. The variance may pertain to what type of moral disapproval a person uses or to what they disapprove of. Our exploration is both conceptual and empirical. Conceptually, we distinguish between four types of moral disapprovals that we call blame, judging blameworthy, condemnation and sadness. We elaborate these four moral phenomena through a conceptual scheme that we call the matrix of moral disapprovals. The matrix is the central conceptual innovation of our paper. It depicts how the four moral disapprovals relate to each other and characterises their typical instances. In the empirical part of the paper, we use the matrix of moral disapproval to examine how decision-makers in Finnish elite sport organisations talk about doping. The empirical examination is based on 31 interviews with decision-makers from Finnish elite sport organisations. Although we distinguish between the conceptual and empirical approaches in our paper, they are not fully separate, but support and inform each other. |
published_date |
2021-07-03T04:07:24Z |
_version_ |
1763753532276604928 |
score |
11.016235 |