No Cover Image

Journal article 549 views 104 downloads

Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram

Elizabeth Pearson Orcid Logo, Nagarajan

African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review, Volume: 10, Issue: 2, Pages: 108 - 140

Swansea University Author: Elizabeth Pearson Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.2979/africonfpeacrevi.10.2.06

Abstract

Scholars have critiqued the incorporation of gender into counter-terrorism and countering violent extremism: programmes have instrumentalised the Women Peace and Security (WPS) agenda towards state-centric goals and essentialised the women (and men) they encounter. Furthermore, as Huckerby outlines,...

Full description

Published in: African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review
ISSN: 2156-695X
Published: Indiana University Press Indiana University Press 2020
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa55111
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2020-09-02T13:43:51Z
last_indexed 2021-01-30T04:19:53Z
id cronfa55111
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><datestamp>2021-01-29T15:51:57.0445248</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>55111</id><entry>2020-09-02</entry><title>Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>b849177199f7a9a44ddecec011c4bf92</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0918-6107</ORCID><firstname>Elizabeth</firstname><surname>Pearson</surname><name>Elizabeth Pearson</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-09-02</date><deptcode>CSSP</deptcode><abstract>Scholars have critiqued the incorporation of gender into counter-terrorism and countering violent extremism: programmes have instrumentalised the Women Peace and Security (WPS) agenda towards state-centric goals and essentialised the women (and men) they encounter. Furthermore, as Huckerby outlines, the explicit inclusion of gender in security policy can produce specific gendered security harms: coercive and non-coercive practices; securitization of women&#x2019;s rights; and lack of attention to the gendered effects of seemingly gender-neutral policy. This article engages Huckerby&#x2019;s typology to explore the gendered security harms produced in Nigeria&#x2019;s counter-insurgency against &#x2018;Boko Haram&#x2019;. It suggests first that a simplistic approach to women, not gendered power relations, leaves Nigeria unable to respond to the complex gendered dynamics of jihadist actors in the northeast. Second, a neglect of human rights and the role of state actors in abuses actively enable gendered security harms. The article concludes that Nigeria is therefore still failing to protect women.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review</journal><volume>10</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>108</paginationStart><paginationEnd>140</paginationEnd><publisher>Indiana University Press</publisher><placeOfPublication>Indiana University Press</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2156-695X</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>10</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2020</publishedYear><publishedDate>2020-10-01</publishedDate><doi>10.2979/africonfpeacrevi.10.2.06</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CSSP</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-01-29T15:51:57.0445248</lastEdited><Created>2020-09-02T14:41:38.3071036</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Elizabeth</firstname><surname>Pearson</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0918-6107</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname/><surname>Nagarajan</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>55111__18106__ae781b0a14734753b5943ecfb28668dc.pdf</filename><originalFilename>55111.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-09-03T11:03:40.2336902</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>402766</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2022-07-05T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs><OutputDur><Id>27</Id><IsDataAvailableOnline>false</IsDataAvailableOnline><DataNotAvailableOnlineReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><IsDurRestrictions>true</IsDurRestrictions><DurRestrictionReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurEmbargoDate xsi:nil="true"/></OutputDur></OutputDurs></rfc1807>
spelling 2021-01-29T15:51:57.0445248 v2 55111 2020-09-02 Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram b849177199f7a9a44ddecec011c4bf92 0000-0003-0918-6107 Elizabeth Pearson Elizabeth Pearson true false 2020-09-02 CSSP Scholars have critiqued the incorporation of gender into counter-terrorism and countering violent extremism: programmes have instrumentalised the Women Peace and Security (WPS) agenda towards state-centric goals and essentialised the women (and men) they encounter. Furthermore, as Huckerby outlines, the explicit inclusion of gender in security policy can produce specific gendered security harms: coercive and non-coercive practices; securitization of women’s rights; and lack of attention to the gendered effects of seemingly gender-neutral policy. This article engages Huckerby’s typology to explore the gendered security harms produced in Nigeria’s counter-insurgency against ‘Boko Haram’. It suggests first that a simplistic approach to women, not gendered power relations, leaves Nigeria unable to respond to the complex gendered dynamics of jihadist actors in the northeast. Second, a neglect of human rights and the role of state actors in abuses actively enable gendered security harms. The article concludes that Nigeria is therefore still failing to protect women. Journal Article African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review 10 2 108 140 Indiana University Press Indiana University Press 2156-695X 1 10 2020 2020-10-01 10.2979/africonfpeacrevi.10.2.06 COLLEGE NANME Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy COLLEGE CODE CSSP Swansea University 2021-01-29T15:51:57.0445248 2020-09-02T14:41:38.3071036 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy Elizabeth Pearson 0000-0003-0918-6107 1 Nagarajan 2 55111__18106__ae781b0a14734753b5943ecfb28668dc.pdf 55111.pdf 2020-09-03T11:03:40.2336902 Output 402766 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2022-07-05T00:00:00.0000000 true eng 27 false true
title Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram
spellingShingle Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram
Elizabeth Pearson
title_short Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram
title_full Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram
title_fullStr Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram
title_full_unstemmed Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram
title_sort Gendered Security Harms: State Policy and the Counterinsurgency Against Boko Haram
author_id_str_mv b849177199f7a9a44ddecec011c4bf92
author_id_fullname_str_mv b849177199f7a9a44ddecec011c4bf92_***_Elizabeth Pearson
author Elizabeth Pearson
author2 Elizabeth Pearson
Nagarajan
format Journal article
container_title African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review
container_volume 10
container_issue 2
container_start_page 108
publishDate 2020
institution Swansea University
issn 2156-695X
doi_str_mv 10.2979/africonfpeacrevi.10.2.06
publisher Indiana University Press
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Scholars have critiqued the incorporation of gender into counter-terrorism and countering violent extremism: programmes have instrumentalised the Women Peace and Security (WPS) agenda towards state-centric goals and essentialised the women (and men) they encounter. Furthermore, as Huckerby outlines, the explicit inclusion of gender in security policy can produce specific gendered security harms: coercive and non-coercive practices; securitization of women’s rights; and lack of attention to the gendered effects of seemingly gender-neutral policy. This article engages Huckerby’s typology to explore the gendered security harms produced in Nigeria’s counter-insurgency against ‘Boko Haram’. It suggests first that a simplistic approach to women, not gendered power relations, leaves Nigeria unable to respond to the complex gendered dynamics of jihadist actors in the northeast. Second, a neglect of human rights and the role of state actors in abuses actively enable gendered security harms. The article concludes that Nigeria is therefore still failing to protect women.
published_date 2020-10-01T04:09:06Z
_version_ 1763753639405420544
score 11.012678

Similar Items