No Cover Image

Journal article 226 views 41 downloads

Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment

Abbie Jayne Parton, Mark Waldron Orcid Logo, Tom Clifford, Owen Jeffries

Physiology & Behavior, Volume: 229, Start page: 113250

Swansea University Author: Mark Waldron Orcid Logo

  • 55692.pdf

    PDF | Accepted Manuscript

    © 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    Download (833.56KB)

Abstract

AimsThis study investigated the efficacy of L-menthol mouth-rinsing on thermal sensation and perceived effort in females and males, using a fixed-rating of perceived exertion (RPE) exercise protocol in a hot environment.MethodsTwenty-two participants (eleven females, eleven males) completed two tria...

Full description

Published in: Physiology & Behavior
ISSN: 0031-9384
Published: Elsevier BV 2021
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa55692
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: AimsThis study investigated the efficacy of L-menthol mouth-rinsing on thermal sensation and perceived effort in females and males, using a fixed-rating of perceived exertion (RPE) exercise protocol in a hot environment.MethodsTwenty-two participants (eleven females, eleven males) completed two trials using a fixed-RPE protocol at an exercise intensity between ‘hard’ and ‘very hard’, equating to 16 on the RPE scale at ∼35°C. Participants adjusted power output to maintain RPE-16. In a randomised, double-blind, crossover design, L-menthol or a control mouthwash was administered at an orally neutral temperature (∼32 °C) prior to exercise and at 10 min intervals thereafter. Measures of mechanical power output, core temperature, heart rate, perception of thermal sensation and thermal comfort, and whole-body sweat loss are reported.ResultsThermal sensation was lowered by L-menthol in both sexes (P < 0.05), however during exercise this was only maintained for 40% of the trial duration in females. Thermal comfort did not differ between conditions (P > 0.05). No differences in exercise duration were observed compared to control, despite a ∼4 % and ∼6 % increase in male and females respectively. Power output increased by ∼6.5 % males (P = 0.039) with no difference in females ∼2.2% (P = 0.475), compared to control. Core temperature, heart rate and whole-body sweat loss was not different between condition or sex.ConclusionsL-menthol lowered perceptual measures of thermal sensation in females, but did not attenuate a greater rate of rise in thermal sensitivity when exercising in a hot environment, compared to males. Males appeared to adopt a higher risk strategy by increasing power output following L-menthol administration in contrast to a more conservative pacing strategy in females. Therefore, there appear to be sex-specific differences in L-menthol's non-thermal cooling properties and subsequent effects on thermo-behavioural adjustments in work-load when exercising in a hot environment.
Keywords: Thermoregulation, Perception, Menthol, Heat, Female, Gender
College: College of Engineering
Start Page: 113250